Open Access

Breastfeeding policy and practices at the general paediatric outpatient clinic of a teaching hospital in Lagos, Nigeria

  • Idowu O Senbanjo1Email author,
  • Kazeem A Oshikoya2,
  • Okeoghene A Ogbera3,
  • Kikelomo O Wright4 and
  • Alexandra L Anga1
International Breastfeeding Journal20149:10

https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-9-10

Received: 7 June 2013

Accepted: 1 June 2014

Published: 27 June 2014

Abstract

Background

Hospitals have a role to play in supporting, protecting and promoting breastfeeding. The aim of this study was to describe hospital breastfeeding policy and practices and breastfeeding rates among mothers attending General Paediatric Outpatient Clinic at a tertiary hospital in Lagos, Nigeria.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study involving paediatric nurses and doctors, as well as the mothers who brought their child to the General Paediatric Outpatient Clinic. Two sets of questionnaires, different in content, were administered to doctors and nurses, and to mothers of children aged 6-24 months, to assess hospital policy and breastfeeding rates, respectively. Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with duration of breastfeeding.

Results

Although the hospital had a written breastfeeding policy copies of the policy were not clearly displayed in any of the units in the Paediatric department. Almost half the staff (48%; 60/125) were not aware of the policy. The hospital had no breastfeeding support group. Nearly three quarters (92/125) of the staff had received lactation management training. 36% (112/311) of mothers exclusively breastfed for six months, 42% (129/311) had stopped breastfeeding at the time of the survey. 67% (207/311) of babies were given infant formula, 85% (175/207) before 6 months. Women who had antenatal care in private hospitals and were Christian were more likely to breastfeed exclusively for 6 months. Low maternal education was the only factor associated with breastfeeding longer than 12 months.

Conclusion

Breastfeeding practices and policy implementation at this outpatient clinic were suboptimal. We have identified a need for interventions to increase knowledge of the benefits of breastfeeding and to provide support for its longer term duration. We suggest that BFHI be considered across all facilities concerned with infant and early child health to disseminate appropriate information and promote an increase in exclusive breastfeeding for six months as well as the duration of breastfeeding.

Keywords

Breastfeeding Policy Practices Out-patient clinic Nigeria

Background

Evidence shows that breastfeeding for the first two years of life has numerous benefits for mother and child [16]. Breastfeeding reduces morbidity and mortality from common childhood diseases such as diarrhoea, acute respiratory infections, and protein energy malnutrition [2, 3]. It also allows for proper maternal and child bonding and offers mothers some protection against ovarian cancer, breast cancer and hip fractures [46]. However, this natural practice is not universally embraced in both developed and developing countries, the rates of exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life and breastfeeding up to the age of two years are alarmingly low [7]. As a result, the United Nations Children International Funds (UNICEF) and the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) in 1991 [8]. The main objective was to mobilize health care systems and health workers to promote, protect and support breastfeeding practices. Since inception of the BFHI, 21,328 facilities in 131 countries have been accredited as baby friendly hospitals [9]. Cross-sectional surveys from the different geo-political zones in Nigeria recorded the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life ranging between 19-30%. Similarly, in a recent National Demographic and Health Survey in Nigeria, the rate of exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life has actually dropped by 4% (from 17% in 2003 to 13% in 2008) [10]. In order to achieve the target rate of 90% for exclusive breastfeeding by the year 2015 [11], efforts at improving breastfeeding practices need to be sustained, and continuous campaigns on the part of the government and other stakeholders need to be intensified. The current practice in Nigeria is for BFHI activities to be concentrated in maternity, post-natal and, well-baby clinics and primary health care and immunization centres. Other potential channels such as the General Paediatrics Outpatient Clinic (GPOC) that could be used to educate and motivate mothers about breastfeeding practices are rarely utilized [12]. Although the 2015 deadline to achieve exclusive breastfeeding globally approaches, actualisation of the BFHI targets in many countries remains beyond reach. Evaluation and reappraisal of BFHI activities is needed to strengthen breastfeeding practices among mothers attending paediatric outpatient clinics of all public hospital in Nigeria.

Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LASUTH) provides paediatric and child health services to a considerable number of inpatients and outpatients and is one of the accredited BFHI centres in Nigeria.

The aims of this study were to describe hospital breastfeeding practices and policy at the GPOC; describe the breastfeeding rates for mothers attending and to determine the factors affecting the duration of exclusive breastfeeding.

Methods

Setting

This was a prospective cross-sectional study carried out at the GPOC, LASUTH. The hospital is a tertiary health facility owned by the Lagos state government. Located in Ikeja local government area, the hospital serves the inhabitants of Lagos and the neighbouring Ogun state and provides subsidized health care for children and the elderly.

The Paediatric department employs 11 Consultant Paediatrician, one a locum,, 45 other doctors (comprising 30 residents, 5 medical officers and 10 contract medical officers) and 84 nurses. Staff rotate through the GOPC on a monthly basis and the service is usually staffed by a consultant paediatrician, eight doctors and ten nurses. The clinic is open every day and attended by an average of 90 patients daily. Breastfeeding practices and policy at the GPOC were descibed by assessing the presence or otherwise of a written breastfeeding policy and breastfeeding support groups, both believed necessary to promote breastfeeding practice. We used a questionnaire to survey the opinions of clinical staff about whether there was a breastfeeding policy or there were any breastfeeding support groups in the hospital. Information about individual staff participation in breastfeeding education and roles in supporting hospital based breastfeeding activities were also sought.

Mothers with children aged 6–24 months who attended the GOPC, between 1 July and 31 August 2012, were approached consecutively, those who agreed to participate were recruited. Questions sought information about breastfeeding practices and relevant factors pertinent to the index baby. Interviews were completed by medical officers who were briefed about the interview process and utilised a questionnaire specifically designed for the study. Relevant background information including infant and parental age, education, parity and any previous breastfeeding was obtained in addition to socio-economic status, and current breastfeeding practice. Families were classified according to socio-economic class using Ogunlesi et al. [13]. Using this system of classification, occupation and highest educational attainment of each parent were scored descending from 1 to 5. The parental mean score determined classification. Those with a mean score of 1 or 2 were further re-classified as upper class, while those with mean scores of 3, 4 and 5 were re-classified as lower social class. Upper social class includes parents such as senior public officers, large scale traders, large scale farmers and professionals while lower social class are peasant farmers, artisans and labourers.

Ethical issues

Ethical approval was obtained from the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital Research and Ethics Committee, reference number LREC/10/06/378. Written informed consent was obtained from each respondent.

Definition of terms

Ever breastfed: The child was ever breastfed.

Exclusive breastfeeding : The child was breastfed exclusive of any other food or fluid with the exception of small amounts of medicinal supplements.

Predominant breastfeeding : When breast milk was the main source of nourishment but supplemented by water, water based dinks, fruit juice, drops or syrups containing vitamins and minerals, supplements or medicines. Other food-based fluids, such as non-human milk, were excluded.

Pre-lacteal feeds: Introduction of fluid or feeds prior to lactation.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was by descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS for Windows software version 11. Univariate analyses were performed for all major variables of interest, such as demographic, socio-economic status, breastfeeding and formula feeding. Mean and standard deviations (SD) were determined for continuous variables while ratios and proportions were calculated for categorical variables. The prevalence estimate for exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life and any breastfeeding for 12 months were defined using specific socio-demographic characteristics to identify potential risk factors for exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months and any breastfeeding for 12 months. Logistic regression using stepwise analysis was used to determine the predictive variables for exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life and any breastfeeding for 12 months after adjusting for confounding variables. A p-value of less than 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Results

Eighty nine percent (125/140) of the paediatric staff returned completed questionnaires. All 311 mothers who met study inclusion criteria consented to participate and completed interviews.

Characteristics of GPOC and staff

The hospital has a written hospital policy on breastfeeding practices, but none was posted on the wall at the GPOC or any of the other units in paediatrics department. There was no existing breastfeeding support group for mothers in paediatric department. Of the 125 staff, 65 (52%) were aware that the hospital has a written policy that supports breastfeeding. Ninety-two (73.6%) staff had ever received lactation management training, only 2 (1.6%) had been trained in the last year. The duration of training ranged from 3 to 5 days. Nineteen (23.5%) staff were involved with assisting mothers (counselling and teaching) on how to breastfeed in the last three months.

Sociodemographic characteristics of mothers and children

Table 1 shows the socio-demographic characteristics of the mothers and their children. The age of the mothers ranged from 12 to 49 years, with mean age of 31.2 years (SD 5.3). Most of the mothers (90.7%) had at least secondary education and were married (96.8%). About half (48.6%) of the mothers had their antenatal care in a private hospital. One hundred and sixty-six (53.4%) mothers gave birth in a private hospital.
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of mothers anf children

Parameters

No. (n = 311)

%

Age of mother

  

≤ 30 years

153

49.2

> 30 years

158

50.8

Age of father

  

≤ 30 years

40

12.9

> 30 years

271

87.1

Age of children (months)

  

6 - 11

139

44.7

12 - 17

80

25.7

18 - 24

92

29.6

Place of residence

  

Rural

24

7.7

Urban

287

92.3

Eductional level of mothers

  

No formal education

2

0.6

Primary

27

8.7

Secondary

122

39.2

Tertiary

160

51.4

Parity

  

1

81

26.0

2

106

34.1

≥ 3

124

39.9

Religion

  

Christian

241

77.5

Muslim

68

21.9

Other

2

0.6

Place of ante-natal care*

  

Private hospital

151

48.6

Tertiary hosptal

15

4.8

General hospital

66

21.2

Primary health care centre

48

15.4

Traditional birth attendant home

5

1.6

Mission home

19

6.1

Home

1

0.3

Place of delivery

  

Private hospital

166

53.4

Tertiary hosptal

10

3.2

General hospital

60

19.3

Primary health care centre

31

10.0

Traditional birth attendant home

5

1.6

Mission home

27

8.7

Home

12

3.9

*Total number of mothers who had antenatal care is 305.

Feeding practices and breastfeeding rates

Ninety seven percent (300/311), breastfed their babies after birth. 27% (81/311), initiated breastfeeding within one hour and 54% (162/311), within 6 hours of the birth. Thirty six percent (112/311), of infants were exclusively breastfed for six months. Two hundred and seven (66.6%) children were given infant formula feeds, of which 175 (84.5%) children were introduced to infant formula feeds before the age of 6 months (Table 2). One hundred and twenty-nine mothers (41.5%) had stopped breastfeeding. Breastfeeding duration ranged between 1 and 19 months. The mean duration of breastfeeding was 11.5 months (SD 4.2). Table 3 shows the reasons why mothers stopped breastfeeding their children before the age of 24 months. About half of the mothers (47.3%) stopped breastfeeding because they thought the duration that they had achieved was adequate.
Table 2

Feeding practices and breastfeeding rates

Parameters

No. (n =311)

%

Prelacteal feeds

166

53.4

Ever breastfed

300

96.5

Initiation of breastfeeding:

  

< one hour

81

26.0

one - < 6 hours

81

26.0

6 - < 24 hours

83

26.7

≥ 24 hours

66

21.2

Exclusive brestfeding for six months

112

36.0

Predominantly breastfeding for six months

36

11.6

Formula feeding

207

66.6

Breastfeeding at the time of survey:

  

6 -11 months

126

90.6

12 -17 months

47

58.8

18 -24 months

9

9.8

Table 3

Reasons for cessation of breastfeeding (n = 129)

 

No.

Percentage

Mean (SD) age of cessation of breastfeeding

Maternal decision

61

47.3

13.6 (3.1)

Baby stopped breastfeeding

21

16.3

9.8 (3.3)

Maternal occupation

14

10.9

9.7 (4.7)

Maternal illness

8

6.2

12.1 (3.2)

Pregnancy

8

6.2

11.8 (2.3)

Not enough milk

4

3.1

8.0 (5.8)

Baby biting mother

3

2.3

14.3 (3.2)

HIV positive mother

3

2.3

1.3 (0.6)

Breastfeeding too demanding/tiring

3

2.3

14.7 (0.6)

Advice from peers

2

1.6

14.5 (0.7)

Loss of husband

1

0.8

12

Twin delivery

1

0.8

10

Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding and duration of breastfeeding

Tables 4 and 5 show the factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding and duration of breastfeeding, respectively. Christian background (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.7, 5.2; p < 0.001) and antenatal care in private hospitals (OR 3.8; 95% CI 1.2, 11.5; p = 0.029) were significantly associated with exclusive breastfeeding, while low maternal education (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.4, 6.1; p = 0.003) was the only factor identified to be associated with breastfeeding duration longer than 12 months. Results of the multiple regression analysis for exclusive breastfeeding for six months and any breastfeeding for 12 months are presented in Table 6. After adjusting for potential confounders, antenatal care in private hospitals and Christian background were significant determinants of exclusive breastfeeding explaining 6.8% of the variance. Low maternal education remains statistically significant in relation to breastfeeding beyond 12 month of age contributing about 4% of the variance.
Table 4

Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding for six months (n =311)

Parameters

Exclusive breastfeeding

Odds ratio

95% CI

Yes

No

No.

%

No.

%

Maternal age

      

 ≤ 30 years

55

35.9

98

64.1

1

 

 > 30 years

57

36.1

101

63.9

1.01

0.6, 1.6

Infant sex

      

 Female

42

32.8

86

67.2

1

 

 Male

68

37.2

115

62.8

1.2

0.8, 1.9

Parity

      

 Multiparity

79

34.5

150

65.5

1

 

 Primiparity

33

40.2

49

59.8

1.3

0.8, 2.1

Religion

      

 Muslim

19

18.5

75

81.5

1

 

 Christian

93

42.9

124

57.1

3.0

1.7, 5.2*

Maternal education

      

 At least secondary

48

31.8

103

68.2

1

 

 Postsecondary

64

40.0

96

60.0

1.4

0.9, 2.3

Social class

      

 Upper

27

34.6

51

65.4

1

 

 Lower

85

36.5

148

63.5

1.1

0.6, 1.9

Place of antenatal care

      

 Private hospital

63

41.7

88

58.3

3.8

1.2, 11.5*

 Government hospitals

40

31.0

89

69.0

2.2

0.8, 7.3

 Others

4

16.0

21

84.0

1

 

Place of delivery

      

 Private hospital

65

39.2

101

60.8

1.0

0.5, 2.0

 Government hospitals

30

29.7

71

70.3

0.7

0.3, 1.4

 Other

17

38.6

27

61.4

1

 

*p <0.05; Other - homes, mission homes and traditional birth attendance.

Table 5

Factors associated with any breastfeeding at 12 months (n=129)*

 

Duration of breastfeeding (months)

Odds ratio

95% CI

 

≤ 12

> 12

Parameters

No.

%

No.

%

Maternal age (Years)

      

 > 30

38

53.5

33

46.5

1

 

 ≤ 30

24

41.4

34

58.6

1.6

0.8,3.3

Child sex

      

 Female

27

49.1

28

50.9

1

 

 Male

35

47.3

39

52.7

1.1

0.5,2.2

Parity

      

 Multiparity

44

50.0

44

50.0

1

 

 Primiparity

18

43.9

23

56.1

1.3

0.6,2.7

Religion

      

 Muslim

9

32.1

19

67.9

1

 

 Christian

53

52.5

48

47.5

0.4

0.2,1.0

Maternal education

      

 Post secondary

43

59.7

29

40.3

1

 

 At least secondary

19

33.3

38

66.7

3.0

1.4,6.1

Social class

      

 Upper

18

60.0

12

40.0

1

 

 Lower

44

44.4

55

55.6

1.9

0.8,4.3

Place of antenatal care

      

 Private hospital

31

58.3

29

41.7

1.0

0.5-,.1

 Government hospitals

31

51.9

30

48.1

1

 

 Others

0

0.0

7

53.8

Undefined

Undefined

Place of delivery

      

 Private hospital

35

48.6

37

51.4

1.7

0.5,5.6

 Government hospitals

22

51.2

21

48.8

1.9

0.5,6.6

 Other

5

35.7

9

64.3

1

 

*The other 182 children are currently been breastfed; p < 0.05; Other - homes, mission homes and traditional birth attendance.

Table 6

Multiple regression analysis of factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months and any breastfeeding for 12 months

Dependent variable

Independent variable

R

r2

F

Sig. F change

Exclusive breastfeeding for 6 monthsa

ANC in private hospital

0.217

0.047

10.8

0.001

Christian religion

0.261

0.068

8.0

0.028

Breastfeeding beyond 12 monthsb

Low maternal education

0.207

0.040

7.6

0.006

ANC - antenatal care; low maternal education - equal to less than secondary education; aAdjusted for maternal age, parity, maternal education, social class, place of delivery and child sex; bAdjusted for maternal age, parity, religion, social class, place of ANC, place of delivery and child sex.

Discussion

This study described breastfeeding policy and practices in addition to breastfeeding rates and duration amongst a group of mothers who attended a BFHI accredited paediatric clinic in Lagos, Nigeria. Ninety seven percent of mothers initiated breastfeeding and 91% were continuing to breastfeed twelve months later. Although breastfeeding rates and duration amongst these study participants are commendable, the suboptimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months is of concern. The 36% exclusive breastfeeding rate at six months observed in our study was similar to the 33% reported in a Baby Friendly Hospital in Enugu, Nigeria [14]. The rate was also similar to the 37% reported among the nursing mothers attending a comprehensive health centre in Nnewi, Nigeria [15] and the 30% reported in a community in Sokoto state, Nigeria [16]. However, the rate was higher than the 19% reported in an urban comprehensive health centre in Ile-Ife, Southwest Nigeria [17] and the 13% obtained from a national demographic health survey in Nigeria [10]. Although, there are discrepancies in the exclusive breastfeeding rates reported in the various regions in Nigeria, the reported rates are too low compared to the set target for 2015 of 90% recommended by the WHO [11]. These results suggest a need for education to raise community, health professional and maternal awareness about the importance of breastfeeding, particularly exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months.

The low rate of exclusive breastfeeding observed in our study, as well as the low rates previously reported in Nigeria, was in contrast to the situation reported in the neighboring West African countries. For instance, in Ghana, exclusive breastfeeding rate was 63%, while in Togo, exclusive breastfeeding rate increased from 48% in 2011 to 63% in 2012 [18]. The low rates of exclusive breastfeeding practices in Nigeria may have contributed to the high burden of under-nutrition and high mortality rate among Nigerian children when compared to Ghana [18] and Togo [18].

This is the first documented description of BFHI activities in LASUTH and it is therefore difficult to make an assertion on the trends of breastfeeding practices, rates and policy in this hospital. Evaluation of BFHI accreditation in many regions of the world has demonstrated the intervention as an important strategy for promoting, protecting and supporting breastfeeding. Ojofeitimi and colleagues in Ile-Ife, Nigeria [19] demonstrated an increase in the breastfeeding rates among mothers attending a BFHI accredited centre compared to those attending another non-accredited one. Our findings reveal that current BFHI activities in our hospital would benefit from attention to breastfeeding promotional campaigns that have been successful in other facilities.

Every breastfeeding mother who visits our hospital presents an opportunity for health education. The prevalence of Predominant rather than Exclusive breastfeeding and the introduction of formula feeding identified in our study presents a challenge. Alerting our staff, mothers and the wider community to the risks of gastroenteritis, nutritional deficit and their consequences is imperative. The establishment of an active breastfeeding support group to provide education and support for breastfeeding is one BFHI strategy deserving attention at our clinic. Prominent signage of our breastfeeding policy is another. Previous studies have shown an improvement in the practice of exclusive breastfeeding after reinforced education of the mothers [20]. Providing breastfeeding information when mothers visit our outpatient clinic may reinforce information given in hospital.

We found higher exclusive breastfeeding amongst women with a Christian background and those who had their antenatal care at private hospitals. These findings are similar to other studies which reported that Christian religion was associated with a number of healthy behaviors [2123].

In contrast to our findings, a study in Ibadan, southwest Nigeria found that mothers who delivered at a tertiary or secondary health facilities were more likely to breastfeed exclusively for six month compared to the mothers who delivered in private hospitals [24]. This difference may be due to a decline in the promotion of breastfeeding activities in government secondary and tertiary hospitals [25].

The duration of breastfeeding has an influence on a child’s nutritional status, morbidity and mortality [26]. WHO recommends breastfeeding up to and beyond 2 years [27]. In our study, most mothers breastfeed up to the age of 12 months, thereafter, breastfeeding rates gradually decline. Many of the reasons given for earlier cessation of breastfeeding highlight areas where we need to support mothers. These reasons need to be addressed during promotional campaigns aimed at encouraging breastfeeding. Similar to other studies [28, 29], we found an association between a higher level of education and earlier cessation of breastfeeding. This may be due to the fact that mothers with high level of education are career women who have to return back to work due to a short maternity leave, lack of electricity to preserve expressed breast milk, and lack of company policies that allow the establishment of a crèche within the company where mothers can take a break to breastfeed their children. Our findings contrast those from a similar study in Nairobi, Kenya [30] which demonstrated that mothers with higher education levels breastfed for longer duration than those with a lower level of education. This difference was ascribed to relatively higher prevalence of HIV infection among those with lower education in the Kenyan subjects which may be associated with early cessation of breastfeeding.

Our study findings demonstrate a need to provide better breastfeeding education and support at every opportunity. This is especially important in a country like Nigeria where poverty, malnutrition and diarrheal diseases remain prevalent among infants.

Our findings also suggest that focus should be on exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life and increasing duration of breastfeeding by mothers. Thus, the goal of interventions should include increasing knowledge on long-term benefits of breastfeeding and the provision of long term breastfeeding support for mothers.

The limitation of this study is that it is cross sectional and therefore caution must be exercised in making causal influence of the identified determinants on exclusive breastfeeding for six months of life and total duration of breastfeeding. Another limitation is the small sample size of mothers which may have resulted in many important independent variables that were not significant. We proposed that future research studies with a larger sample size compare breastfeeding practice at the GOPC with like services to identify effective strategies to promote, protect and support breastfeeding.

Conclusion

In conclusion, breastfeeding practices and BFHI policy implementation at LASUTH GPOC was suboptimal. The attitude of mothers towards breastfeeding was good but the rate of exclusive breastfeeding for six months and breastfeeding up to the age of two years was very low because of the introduction of other foods, in the former instance and earlier than optimal cessation of breastfeeding in the latter. We suggest that BFHI initiatives be considered across all facilities concerned with infant and early child health to disseminate appropriate information and promote an increase in exclusive breastfeeding for six months as well as the duration of breastfeeding.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

We thank all the study participants and the medical officers who assisted with the administration of the questionnaires.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Lagos State University College of Medicine
(2)
Department of Pharmacology, Lagos State University College of Medicine
(3)
Department of Internal Medicine, Lagos State University College of Medicine
(4)
Department of Community Health and Primary Health Care, Lagos State University College of Medicine

References

  1. Chong YS: Human milk is still best. BMJ. 2003, 327: 683.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Leung AK, Sauve RS: Breast is best for babies. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005, 97: 1010-1019.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Salone LR, Vann WF, Dee DL: Breastfeeding: an overview of oral and general health benefits. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013, 144: 143-151.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rea MF: Benefits of breastfeeding and women’s health. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2004, 80 (5 Suppl): S142-S146.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Britton JR, Britton HL, Gronwaldt V: Breastfeeding, sensitivity, and attachment. Pediatrics. 2006, 118: e1436-e1443.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Tharner A, Luijk MP, Raat H, Ijzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Moll HA, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, Verhulst FC, Tiemeier H: Breastfeeding and its relation to maternal sensitivity and infant attachment. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2012, 33: 396-404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Imdad A, Yakoob MY, Bhutta ZA: Effect of breastfeeding promotion interventions on breastfeeding rates, with special focus on developing countries. BMC Public Health. 2011, 11 (Suppl 3): S24.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones F, Green M: Baby friendly care. Can Nurse. 1993, 89: 36-39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Labbok MH: Global baby-friendly hospital initiative monitoring data: update and discussion. Breastfeed Med. 2012, 7: 210-222.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. National Population Commission (NPC) and ICF Macro: Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2008. Calverton, Maryland, USA: NPC and ICF Macro; 2009.Google Scholar
  11. World Health Organization: Infant and Young Child Feeding: Model Chapter for Textbooks for Medical Students and Allied Health Professionals. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.Google Scholar
  12. Witt AM, Smith S, Mason MJ, Flocke SA: Integrating routine lactation consultant support into a pediatric practice. Breastfeed Med. 2012, 7: 38-42.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ogunlesi TA, Dedeke IOF, Kuponiyi OT: Socio-economic classification of children attending specialist paediatric centres in Ogun state, Nigeria. Niger Med Pract. 2008, 54: 21-25.Google Scholar
  14. Aghaji MN: Exclusive breast-feeding practice and associated factors in Enugu, Nigeria. West Afr J Med. 2002, 21: 66-69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ukegbu AU, Ukegbu PO, Onyeonoro UU, Ubajaka CF: Determinants of breastfeeding patterns among mothers in Anambra State, Nigeria. SA J Child health. 2011, 5: 112-116.Google Scholar
  16. Qureshi AM, Oche OM, Sadiq UA, Kabiru S: Using community volunteers to promote exclusive breastfeeding in Sokoto State, Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 2011, 10: 8-Epub 2011 Sep 23.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Agunbiade OM, Ogunleye OV: Constraints to exclusive breastfeeding practice among breastfeeding mothers in Southwest Nigeria: implications for scaling up. Int Breastfeed J. 2012, 7: 5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. ᅟ: The State of the World Children - Children in an Urban World. New York: UNICEF; 2012. Available at: http://www.unicef.org/sowc2012.Google Scholar
  19. Ojofeitimi EO, Esimai OA, Owolabi OO, Oluwabusi , Olaobaju OF, Olanuga TO: Breastfeeding practices in urban and rural health centres: impact of baby friendly hospital initiative in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Nutr Health. 2000, 14: 119-125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Haque MF, Hussain M, Sarkar A, Hoque MM, Ara FA, Sultana S: Breast-feeding counselling and its effect on the prevalence of exclusive breast-feeding. J Health Popul Nutr. 2002, 20: 312-316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Strawbridge WJ, Cohen RD, Shema SJ, Kaplan GA: Frequent attendance at religious services and mortality over 28 years. Am J Public Health. 1997, 87: 957-961.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Merrill RM, Lyon JL, Madanat H: Active religion and health in Utah. Dialogue J Mormon Thought. 2002, 35: 78-90.Google Scholar
  23. Daniels M, Merrill RM, Lyon JL, Stanford JB, White GL: Associations between breast cancer risk factors and religious practices in Utah. Prev Med. 2004, 38: 28-38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lawoyin TO, Olawuyi JF, Onadeko MO: Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding in Ibadan, Nigeria. J Hum Lact. 2001, 17: 321-325.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. News Agency of Nigeria: Unicef calls for conducive environment for breastfeeding. Available at: http://www.nanngronline.com/section/healthgender/.
  26. Susilowati MKM, Kusharisupeni , Fikawati S, Achmad K: Breast-feeding duration and children’s nutritional status at age 12–24 months. Paediatr Indones. 2010, 50: 56-61.Google Scholar
  27. World Health Organization: Infants and Young Child Feeding. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.Google Scholar
  28. Agho KE, Dibley MJ, Odiase JI, Ogbonmwan SM: Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding in Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011, 11: 2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Radwan H: Patterns and determinants of breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices of Emirati Mothers in the United Arab Emirates. BMC Public Health. 2013, 13: 171.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kimani-Murage EW, Madise NJ, Fotso JC, Kyobutungi C, Mutua MK, Gitau TM, Yatich N: Patterns and determinants of breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices in urban informal settlements, Nairobi Kenya. BMC Public Health. 2011, 11: 396.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Senbanjo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Advertisement