Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of an infant’s life and associated factors in a low–middle income country

International Breastfeeding Journal volume 18, Article number: 47 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Although breastfeeding is practiced by 98% of mothers in Vietnam, infant breastfeeding behaviors remain far from World Health Organization recommendations and continues to decline. This study aims to explore the prevalence and factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months of an infant’s life.

Methods

A cross-sectional study utilized a self-administered maternal questionnaire to collect data on 1072 Vietnamese mothers who brought infants aged between 6 and 30 months to a community health centre (CHC) for routine vaccination. Data collection was conducted from March to May 2021 in two cities in Central and North Vietnam. In order to measure exclusive breastfeeding, we asked mothers to recall (yes / no), if the child had received breast milk, formula, colostrum milk powder, water, vitamin / medicine, fruit juice / honey, and complementary foods aged under six months.

Results

In the first six months, 14.2% of mothers exclusively breastfed their infants. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between exclusive infant breastfeeding and the highest maternal education level (university or postgraduate) (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10, 5.91); male infants (aOR 1.72; 95% CI 1.11, 2.68); duration of skin-to-skin contact greater than 90 min (aOR 7.69; 95% CI 1.95, 30.38); receiving first breastfeeding during skin-to-skin contact (aOR 2.31; 95% CI 1.30, 4.10); completely feeding infant directly at the breast (aOR 1.65; 95% CI 1.00, 2.71) and exclusive breastfeeding intention during pregnancy (aOR 2.48; 95% CI 1.53, 4.00). When compared with mothers who were prenatally exposed to infant formula advertising classified as “often”, the prevalence of exclusive infant breastfeeding was higher in mothers who classified their prenatal exposure to infant formula advertising as “sometimes” (aOR 2.15; 95% CI 1.13, 4.10), and “seldom” (aOR 2.58; 95% CI 1.25, 5.36).

Conclusion

The prevalence of mothers who practiced exclusive infant breastfeeding during the first six months in Vietnam was low. Infants should receive early maternal-infant skin-to-skin contact greater than 90 min and complete first breastfeeding during skin-to-skin contact. Further, mothers should be protected against infant formula advertisements to maximise the likelihood of exclusive breastfeeding during the child’s infancy.

Background

Despite significant evidence of the benefits of breastfeeding, nearly 60% of infants younger than six months are not exclusively breastfed worldwide – a proportion that has had minimal improvement over the past two decades [1]. In low-income countries, 53% of infants under six months were not exclusively breastfed, while these rates were 61% and 63% in lower-middle income and upper-middle income countries respectively [2]. Further, middle-income and high-income countries tend to have a shorter duration of infant breastfeeding compared to low-income countries [2]. In May 2012, the World Health Assembly Resolution set Goal 65.6 with the target that at least 50% of infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life by 2025 [3]. Further, they found that stronger commitment and much more effort from governments and health authorities are in urgent need to achieve this breastfeeding goal.

The determinants of breastfeeding are multifactorial. They range from medical disorders, hospital practices, socioeconomic factors, cultural attitudes, media and marketing, workplace support, to individual characteristics [4]. Nearly all maternal-infant dyads can breastfeed, with few maternal or infant conditions requiring avoidance of breastfeeding such as galactosemia [5]. Health workers can influence feeding decisions at important moments such as right after birth and support breastfeeding efforts when challenges occur. Conversely, early mother-infant separation, and the recommendation to use breast milk substitutes during the maternal hospitalization are hospital practices that negatively impact breastfeeding [6]. Additionally, the availability of infant formula also limits breastfeeding [7]. Further, aggressive marketing of infant formula has been found to be associated with discontinuation of exclusive infant breastfeeding [8] and impacts maternal decisions on infant feeding practices [9]. Besides maternal lack of awareness, in some traditional cultural beliefs, colostrum is considered harmful to infants and is discarded instead of being used [10]. Finally, the leading reason for early weaning of breastfeeding can be attributed to women’s need to return to the workplace soon after childbirth. A longer duration of postpartum maternity leave was associated with an increased prevalence of long duration of breastfeeding [11].

Vietnam is a low–middle income country in the World Health Organization (WHO) Western Pacific Region. Since the early 1990s, Vietnam has implemented national initiatives to create a strong regulatory environment to protect, promote and support infant breastfeeding [7]. The Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) was implemented in Vietnam in 1992 with the goal of adhering to the WHO’s Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding [12]. Since 2013, Vietnamese mothers with newborn infants have been entitled to six months of maternity leave after delivery which is similar to the WHO recommendation of approximately six months of exclusive infant breastfeeding. In 2014, early essential newborn care (EENC) was adopted in Vietnam which led to improvements in early initiation of breastfeeding [13]. In the same year, the Prime Minister approved the Vietnam Government Decree 100, which imposed regulations on the marketing and use of nutritional products for young children, feeding bottles, teats, and pacifiers [14]. Despite these successive national efforts, the proportion of mothers breastfeeding in Vietnam is far from WHO recommendations and continues to decline [15, 16]. Although breastfeeding is practiced by 98% of mothers in Vietnam, infant breastfeeding behaviors remains far from ideal [17]. Results from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys in Vietnam between 2000 and 2011 showed that exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months decreased by 8% between 2000 (25%) and 2006 (17%), and remained unchanged between 2006 (17%) and 2011 (17%) [15]. Another study conducted in southern Vietnam reported the prevalence of exclusive infant breastfeeding at 33% before hospital discharge, but this declined to 15% at four months and less than 1% at six months of life [16]. Mothers whose infants were delivered by Cesarean sections were also associated with delayed breastfeeding initiation, which is an important predictor of continued and exclusive infant breastfeeding [18]. In Vietnam, Cesarean section rates have increased significantly in recent years, with above 50% of infants being delivered by Cesarean section in some cities, complicating efforts to improve infant breastfeeding practices [19, 20]. Other factors associated with breastfeeding practices in Vietnam included socioeconomic status, mother’s employment outside of the home, lack of breastfeeding knowledge or misinformation, mother’s highest education level, father’s occupation, and infant feeding preferences of the father [21, 22]. Prior to this study conducted in two cities in North and Central Vietnam, however, there have been few studies published regarding the prevalence of exclusive infant breastfeeding for the first six months which include Vietnam’s EENC and level of mother’s exposure to infant formula advertising as potential related factors for infant breastfeeding. In addition, these studies’ relevance to the Vietnamese infant population may be limited due to small sample sizes. Thus, the objective of this current study is to determine the prevalence of six-month breastfeeding and the associated factors which influence maternal infant breastfeeding practices.

Methods

Study design

A cross-sectional study utilized a designed questionnaire that was given to mothers to collect data from March to May 2021. One core member of the research team in each city was responsible for supervising data collection. Each core member then trained and supervised all data collectors and routinely checked all completed maternal questionnaires. Data collectors at each site were responsible for distributing questionnaires to eligible mothers and collecting completed questionnaires.

Study setting

Vietnam is the third most populous country in Southeast Asia with over 97 million people in 2020, with nearly one-third of that population living in rural areas. In 2019, there were 24.9 million women of reproductive age (15–49 years) and approximately 1.6 million live births. At that time, the mortality rate for children under the age of 5 was 20 per 1000 live births, the infant mortality rate was 16 per 1000 live births, and the neonatal mortality was 10 per 1000 live births [23].

This study was conducted in two cities in Central and North Vietnam. The first city, Da Nang, is one of the most important port cities in Central Vietnam with a population of over 1.1 million in 2020. The city has a total natural land area of around 1283 km2, of which 241 km2 are urban districts and it has the highest urbanization ratio among provinces in Vietnam, with nearly 90% of the population living in urban areas. The neonatal mortality in Da Nang was 4 per 1000 live births. The second study city, Thai Nguyen City, is located in the centre of the Northern region which is close to Ha Noi, the capital city. Thai Nguyen City has a natural land area of about 223 km2 and a population of approximately 340,000 in 2019. In total, there are 32 CHCs in Thai Nguyen City and 56 CHCs in Da Nang City.

There were eight selected sites (CHC) in Thai Nguyen City. Four of the selected CHCs were located in communities categorized as urban areas and four CHCs were in areas categorized as semi-urban (ward) areas. In Da Nang City, ten CHCs were selected and were located in the urban areas and six CHCs were located in the surrounding semi-urban communities. Our sampling method was based on our ability to get data collection approval from the CHCs as the study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Participants

Mothers whose infants were aged greater than 6 months to 30 months who presented to the CHCs for routine vaccination were invited to join the study. In Vietnam, the national Expanded Programme on Immunization is integrated into the services of CHCs. All children in Vietnam are required to be fully immunized according to the Expanded Programme on Immunization. The pediatric vaccination participation rate is greater than 95% in the country. Only mothers of singletons were included. After maternal verbal informed consent was given to participate in the study, each mother received a self-administered questionnaire.

Questionnaire and data collection

Our study questionnaire was based both on a literature review of breastfeeding patterns [16, 24,25,26,27] and from consulting with maternal-infant clinical specialists who have experience in infant breastfeeding and EENC practices. The full questionnaire consisted of 39 self-administered questions to each mother and the questions asked were to help determine potential factors associated with breastfeeding in the first six months of the infants life including: (1) maternal socio-demographic information (age, education level); (2) place of residence; (3) parity; (4) age of infant when mother returned to work after maternity leave; (5) complications during pregnancy and at delivery; (6) infant characteristics (sex, birth weight, mode of delivery, hospital of birth, complication at birth); (7) skin-to-skin contact practice after birth (no, < 15 min, 15–90 min, > 90 min); (8) having first breastfeed during skin-to-skin contact; (9) breastfeeding methods (direct or mixed between direct and expressed breast milk); (10) breastfeeding difficulties; 11) level of exposure to infant formula advertising during pregnancy (“often”, “sometimes”, “seldom”); 12) receiving breastfeeding counselling; 13) intention of feeding pattern during pregnancy; 14) knowledge on definition and duration of exclusive breastfeeding; and 15) breastfeeding support in the workplace. These variables were chosen based on the review of existing publications and current practice on EENC in Vietnam [13, 21, 25,26,27]. Our study questionnaire has not been previously utilized or published.

The cut-off values of the duration of skin-to-skin contact were based on the dividing values to assess how long after birth the baby received first breastfeeding in the WHO checklist used to interview postpartum mothers [28]. A draft questionnaire was sent to ten mothers to test for confusion about any questions and were then asked for any suggestions or changes to the draft questionnaire. After receiving feedback from the initial pilot testing, the questionnaire was revised, and questions were rearranged for better clarity when being answered.

The primary outcome of interest was the prevalence of exclusive infant breastfeeding for the first six months of life. As defined by the WHO, exclusive infant breastfeeding is an infant being fed only breast milk as the sole source of nutrition. No other liquids, solids, or water is consumed by the infants, except vitamins, minerals, and medicines [29]. Exclusive infant breastfeeding can either be direct breastfeeding or expressed breast milk feeding. In our study, we asked mothers what their infant’s primary source of nutrition was when they were under six months of age with the options including breast milk (yes / no), infant formula (yes / no), colostrum milk powder (yes / no). Other supplements were also asked about including water (yes / no), vitamin / medicine (yes / no), fruit juice / honey (yes / no), and complementary foods (yes / no). Exclusive breastfeeding was identified based on the answer “yes” for the breast milk and “no” for infant formula, colostrum milk powder, water, fruit juice / honey, and complementary foods.

Printed questionnaires were distributed to eligible mothers while at the CHCs. For mothers who were holding their infants and required help, the data collectors read the questionnaire and recorded their answers. The collectors sat down in the same direction as the mothers so that they could still view the questionnaire. Our study followed A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) [30].

Sampling technique and sample size determination

The sample size was calculated by using the formula of estimating prevalence with the following assumptions: Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding was 19.6% which was taken from the National Institute of Nutrition [31], with 95% confidence interval, precision error of 2.5%, and 5% non-response rate. The required sample size was 1018 participants. Finally, a total of 1072 mothers were included in the analysis. The detailed sampling procedure is described in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Sampling procedure and study participants

Full size image

Data quality control and data analysis

All completed questionnaires were carefully checked before entering data in EpiData version 3.1. Data entry forms were designed to minimize missing and incorrect data such as value ranges and dropdown lists.

Descriptive analysis was done for all variables in the study. Categorical variables were presented with frequency and percentage. Continuous variables were presented with mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR). The prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months is defined as percentage of infants who were fed exclusively with breast milk when they were less than six months as reported by mothers.

Binary logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the crude odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) between the outcome (exclusive breastfeeding) and independent variables. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with the outcome and reported using adjusted OR (aOR) and 95% CI. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were done using R version 3.6.1.

Ethics approval and informed consent

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City according to Decision No. 990 / HĐĐĐ-ĐHYD date 11 / 01 / 2020. The surveys were anonymous to protect the identities of both the mother and infant.

Results

Maternal and infant characteristics

A total of 1072 mothers of infants aged over 6 to 30 months completed questionnaires. The background characteristics of mothers and their infants are presented in Table 1. Mothers’ age ranged from 18 to 46 with a mean of 29.8 ± 4.9. The majority of the mothers (87.1%) had an education level of high school or higher.

Table 1 Characteristic of mothers, infants, skin-to-skin contact practices and breastfeeding practices, Vietnam, 2021 (n = 1072)
Full size table

Approximately half of the study infants (50.4%) were born by Cesarean section. A majority of the mothers (87.3%) reported they had skin-to-skin contact with their infants after birth, but only 17.7% of mothers experienced more than 90 min of skin-to-skin contact with their infants, and 53.3% of infants had first breastfeeding during skin-to-skin contact.

A majority of the mothers (74.2%) received breastfeeding counselling; 62.1% of mothers were able to correctly define exclusive breastfeeding; and 51.3% correctly identify recommended duration of exclusive breastfeeding. During pregnancy, 54.8% of the mothers stated an intention to breastfeed their babies exclusively for the first six months of life, and the remaining stated an intention to feed the infants either with the combination of breast milk and infant formula (43.7%) or with formula only (1.5%). Furthermore, exposure to infant formula advertising during pregnancy was reported as “often” in 23.6% of mothers, “sometimes” in 51.5% of mothers, and “seldom” in 24.9% of mothers.

Breastfeeding practice

In our study, nearly all the infants were breastfed (99.3%) with the prevalence of exclusive infant breastfeeding in the first six months of life at 14.2%. Approximately one-third of the mothers (38.9%) practice mixed feeding (a combination of direct breast feeding and expressed breast milk). In non-breastfed infants, 63.7% were given infant formula and 42.2% received complementary food feedings when they were less than six months of age (Table 1).

Differences in feeding practices between mothers who had prenatal intention to exclusively breastfeed and mothers who had prenatal intention to combine breast milk and infant formula are presented in Fig. 2. The exclusive breastfeeding proportion was significantly higher in mothers who intended to breastfeed their babies exclusively compared to those who intended to feed the infants a combination of breast milk and infant formula (p < 0.0001).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Differences in feeding practices between mothers who had prenatal intention to exclusively breastfeed and mothers who had prenatal intention to combine breast milk and formula

Full size image

Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life

In multivariable logistic regression analysis, level of education; sex of infants (male); duration of skin-to-skin contact; having first breastfeeding during skin-to-skin contact; feeding infant directly at the breast exclusively; level of exposure to infant formula advertising; and exclusive breastfeeding intention during pregnancy were significant predictors of exclusive infant breastfeeding (Table 2). For exclusive breastfeeding the aOR was 2.55 (95% CI 1.10, 5.91) times higher among mothers who had a university or postgraduate degree than among mothers with a primary and secondary school level of education. Mothers who experienced skin-to-skin contact had higher odds of exclusive breastfeeding compared to mothers who did not experience skin-to-skin contact. A longer duration of skin-to-skin contact in our study was also associated with higher odds of exclusive breastfeeding. The aORs of exclusive breastfeeding in the group with skin-to-skin contact were 7.69 (95% CI 1.95, 30.38), 3.64 (95% CI 0.98, 13.59), and 1.83 (95% CI 0.49, 6.78) times higher for skin-to-skin contact of > 90 min, 15─90 min, and < 15 min respectively compared to the group without skin-to-skin contact. Further, infants who completed their first breastfeeding while having skin-to-skin contact had a positive effect on exclusive breastfeeding (aOR 2.31; 95% CI 1.30, 4.10) and male infants were more likely to be exclusively breastfed compared to female infants (aOR 1.72; 95% CI 1.11, 2.68). The mothers who had a prenatal intention to exclusively breastfeed had 2.48 times the aOR of exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life compared to the mothers who had a prenatal intention to combine breast milk and infant formula feeding (95% CI 1.53, 4.00). The level of exposure to infant formula advertising during pregnancy showed a “dose-response” type relationship. Mothers who classified their exposure to infant formula advertising as “sometimes” were associated with aOR 2.15; 95% CI 1.13, 4.10) times higher odds of exclusive breastfeeding compared to those whose exposure to advertising was classified as “often”. Mothers who classified their exposure to infant formula advertising as “seldom” were associated with aOR 2.58; 95% CI 1.25, 5.36] times higher odds of exclusive infant breastfeeding as compared to those whose exposure to advertising was classified as “often”.

Table 2 Factors associated to exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life (N = 1072)
Full size table

Discussion

In our study which looked at infant breastfeeding practices in two cities Central and North Vietnam, the prevalence of exclusive infant breastfeeding in the first six months of life was 14.2%. This prevalence was lower than that found in published data from other regions of Vietnam. The proportion reported by UNICEF in 2019 was 24% for infants less than six months of age [32], and the proportion of infants from birth to five months of age as reported by Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys was 17% [15]. A recent study conducted in southern Vietnam showed a prevalence of exclusive infant breastfeeding of less than 1% at six months [16]. In comparison to the prevalence of exclusive infant breastfeeding in children younger than six months in East Asia and the Pacific Regions of 31% and in lower-middle-income countries of 61%, our study presented a significantly low prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding [2]. The diversity in study designs, populations, breastfeeding metrics collected, and individual culture’s breastfeeding beliefs may be the reason for the difference in our study’s finding. The method of calculating the breastfeeding rate is an example of this diversity as well. The prevalence of exclusive infant breastfeeding may be identified in some studies based on maternal self-report when the infant is six months old [16] or based on the number of infants less than six months old who received only breast milk in the previous 24 h. Thus, given these confounding study variables, the actual rates of exclusive infant breastfeeding might be lower than what is reported in the published studies.

In our study, mothers who had infants aged over 6 to 30 months were surveyed and the prevalence of exclusively breastfeed infants was defined as the percentage of infants who were fed only with breast milk during the first six months of life. We asked mothers to recall if the child had received breast milk, infant formula, colostrum milk powder, water, vitamin / medicine, fruit juice / honey, and complementary foods when they were under six months of age. Exclusive breastfeeding was identified based on the answer “yes” for the breast milk and “no” for infant formula, colostrum milk powder, water, fruit juice / honey, and complementary foods. Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding in the current study was based on since-birth recall which differed from those utilized by UNICEF and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys which defined exclusive breastfeeding under six months as the percentage of infants 0─5 months of age who were fed exclusively with breast milk during the previous day. Therefore, the low prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding in our study may not actually reflect the declining exclusive infant breastfeeding trend in Vietnam. Several studies compared the used of 24-hour recall with since‐birth recall and showed similar results to ours [33,34,35]. They found that the use of 24-hour recall overestimated exclusive breastfeeding compared to since‐birth recall [33,34,35]. A longitudinal prospective study in Sweden, for example, showed a wide discrepancy between the exclusive breastfeeding rate obtained from data based on 24-hour recall and the entire feeding pattern since birth [35]. The difference was over 40% points at two and four months and 9% points at six months.

In our study, we found a high prevalence (63.7%) of infants being fed infant formula in the first six months of their lives. Similarly, a previous study in Vietnam showed infant formula feeding was popular prior to hospital discharge (79.5%) [36]. Further, our results showed a “dose-response” type relationship between the level of maternal exposure to infant formula advertising and exclusive infant breastfeeding. Maternal breastfeeding is affected by advertisements and the widespread availability of breast milk substitutes in Vietnam. The marketing of breast milk substitutes can influence social norms regarding the ease and desirability of infant formula use and undermine a mother’s confidence in breastfeeding her infant [37]. In Vietnam, the government banned the advertising and promotion of breast milk substitutes since 2014 through “Decree 100”. However, infant formula advertising still appears in the media [38]. Breast milk substitutes contribute to increased environmental costs via manufacturing, packaging, distribution, and waste disposal [4]. In Vietnam, a stronger political commitment is required to ensure accountability for marketing these infant formula products.

We identified several other important factors in our study that influenced infant breastfeeding practices. A significant finding from our study is the importance of early skin-to-skin contact. Mothers who had greater than 90 min of skin-to-skin contact and completed the first breastfeeding during skin-to-skin contact were found to have a statistically significant positive association with exclusive infant breastfeeding during the first six months of life. These results are consistent with those of previously published studies [26, 27]. Further, Cesarean section birth is also a known barrier to infant breastfeeding [18]. Currently, the Cesarean section rate in Vietnam is accelerating, and is over 50% of the deliveries in some cities [19, 20], which we also found in the current study (50.4%). Uninterrupted skin-to-skin contact as part of EENC implementation aims to moderate the negative effects of Cesarean section on breastfeeding outcomes. Since November 2014, and in accordance with the Ministry of Health Hospital Policy Directive 4673 (EENC implementation for uncomplicated Cesarean section births), policies were implemented in hospitals throughout Vietnam to follow this directive [13]. According to the protocol, the baby is to be placed on the mother’s chest area immediately after delivery to establish skin-to-skin contact, while the remaining procedures for a Cesarean operation are practiced as usual. When possible, regional anaesthesia is recommended instead of general anaesthesia because it allow mothers to support their infant in maintaining skin-to-skin contact. For mothers who receive general anesthesia, the anaesthetist must carefully monitor to ensure mother’s pulse oximetry is > 95%, and one staff member is responsible for monitoring and supporting the newborn on their mother’s chest. After delivery, the infant and mother are transferred to the recovery room in the skin-to-skin contact position. Uninterrupted skin-to-skin contact is to be maintained for at least 90 min in the recovery room and until the completion of first breastfeeding. As shown in Tables 2, 87.3% of mothers in our study experienced skin-to-skin contact with their infant right after birth. The high rate of skin-to-skin contact practice in Vietnam as well as the positive effects of duration of skin-to-skin contact on exclusive infant breastfeeding during the first six months suggest that skin-to-skin contact and early initiation of infant breastfeeding, as part of EENC implementation, appear to mitigate the negative effects of Cesarean section birth on exclusive infant breastfeeding.

We also found that a mother’s prenatal intention to exclusively breastfeed after delivery was associated with a higher probability of exclusive infant breastfeeding for the first six months of the infant’s life. Our current study confirms similar previous findings in the literature [39]. Despite a high proportion of mothers (74.2%), intending to exclusively breastfeed, non-breastfeeding practices such as discarding colostrum and using colostrum milk powder, giving water and honey to the infant, and feeding the children with extra infant formula whenever they cry because of the belief in mother’s milk supply being insufficient remain common practices in Vietnam [25]. If mothers can have a better understanding about the benefits of infant breastfeeding, and of the idea of “exclusive breastfeeding”, as well as have positive beliefs and confidence in their breastfeeding by receiving support from family members and healthcare workers, they are more likely to exclusively breastfeed their infants [40].

Our study has several limitations. First, the relationship between predictors and exclusive infant breastfeeding was not causally related because of the disadvantage of a cross-sectional study design. Second, maternal recall bias is another concern when interpreting the results. Third, there may exist a selection bias as we did not survey women who brought their infants to a private clinic / hospital for vaccination results due to the difficulties of getting data collection approval from private settings in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, as most of the children in Vietnam are vaccinated in public settings, data from our sample may not be far from the entire population. Further, we did not collect breastfeeding data on infants who were brought to CHCs by fathers or grandparents. Nevertheless, our current study on the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding and associated factors which influence breastfeeding decisions and practices could be a useful source for stakeholders and policymakers to develop an appropriate and effective intervention to promote breastfeeding, especially in low–middle income countries like Vietnam.

Conclusion

In our current study, we found the prevalence of exclusive infant breastfeeding for the first six months of life in Vietnam is low. Our study findings regarding factors associated with an increased probability of exclusive infant breastfeeding should be utilized to develop measures to protect, promote, and support infant breastfeeding. In particular, promoting early maternal-infant skin-to-skin contact of more than 90 min duration and completion of first breastfeeding during skin-to-skin contact should be encouraged. A greater political commitment to hospital practices and infant formula milk marketing is needed to reduce the mother’s prenatal exposure to infant formula advertising.

Data availability

The datasets used and / or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CHC:

Community Health Centre

EENC:

Early Essential Newborn Care

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. World Health Organization. Infant and young child feeding. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding. Accessed 12/12/2021.

  2. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, França GVA, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. The Lancet. 2016;387(10017):475–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization. Essential nutrition actions: improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241505550. Accessed 13/07/2022.

  4. Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter CK, Martines JC, et al. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? The Lancet. 2016;387(10017):491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization. (2009). Infant and young child feeding: model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44117.

  6. Pries AM, Huffman SL, Adhikary I, Upreti SR, Dhungel S, Champeny M, et al. Promotion and prelacteal feeding of breastmilk substitutes among mothers in Kathmandu Valley. Nepal Maternal & Child Nutrition. 2016;12(Suppl 2):8–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen TT, Darnell A, Weissman A, Cashin J, Withers M, Mathisen R, et al. National nutrition strategies that focus on maternal, infant, and young child nutrition in Southeast Asia do not consistently align with regional and international recommendations. Matern Child Nutr. 2020;16(Suppl 2):e12937–e.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lisi C, de Freitas C, Barros H. The impact of formula industry marketing on breastfeeding rates in native and migrant mothers. Breastfeed Medicine: Official J Acad Breastfeed Med. 2021;16(9):725–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hernández-Cordero S, Vilar-Compte M, Castañeda-Márquez AC, Rollins N, Kingston G, Pérez-Escamilla R. Exposure to marketing of breastmilk substitutes in mexican women: sources and scope. Int Breastfeed J. 2022;17:16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Randhawa A, Chaudhary N, Gill BS, Singh A, Garg V, Balgir RS. A population-based cross-sectional study to determine the practices of breastfeeding among the lactating mothers of Patiala city. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(10):3207–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. de Lauzon-Guillain B, Thierry X, Bois C, Bournez M, Davisse-Paturet C, Dufourg MN, et al. Maternity or parental leave and breastfeeding duration: results from the ELFE cohort. Matern Child Nutr. 2019;15(4):e12872.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. World Health Organization. National Implementation of the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative., 2017. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255197/9789241512381-eng.pdf;jsessionid=C7B4B01F9582E9631995C93DF463214D?sequence=1. Accessed on 06/07/2022.

  13. Tran HT, Murray JCS, Sobel HL, Mannava P, Huynh LT, Nguyen PTT, et al. Early essential newborn care is associated with improved newborn outcomes following caesarean section births in a tertiary hospital in Da Nang, Vietnam: a pre/post-intervention study. BMJ Open Quality. 2021;10(3):e001089.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Government V. Decree 100/2014/NĐ-CP on the trading in and use of Nutritious Products for Infants, feeding bottles and teats. Vietnam Government Ha Noi, Vietnam; 2014.

  15. Bui QT, Lee HY, Le AT, Van Dung D, Vu LT. Trends and determinants for early initiation of and exclusive breastfeeding under six months in Vietnam: results from the multiple Indicator cluster surveys, 2000–2011. Global Health Action. 2016;9:29433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Le Q-NT, Phung K-L, Nguyen V-TT, Anders KL, Nguyen M-N, Hoang D-TT, et al. Factors associated with a low prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding during hospital stay in urban and semi-rural areas of southern Vietnam. Int Breastfeed J. 2018;13:46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen PH, Menon P, Ruel M, Hajeebhoy N. A situational review of infant and young child feeding practices and interventions in Viet Nam. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2011;20(3):359–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hobbs AJ, Mannion CA, McDonald SW, Brockway M, Tough SC. The impact of caesarean section on breastfeeding initiation, duration and difficulties in the first four months postpartum. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Giang HTN, Ulrich S, Tran HT, Bechtold-Dalla Pozza S. Monitoring and interventions are needed to reduce the very high caesarean section rates in Vietnam. Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway: 1992). 2018;107(12):2109-14.

  20. Giang HTN, Duy DTT, Hieu LTM, Vuong NL, Ngoc NTT, Phuong MT, et al. Factors associated with the very high caesarean section rate in urban areas of Vietnam. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(8):e0273847.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Duong DV, Lee AH, Binns CW. Determinants of breast-feeding within the first 6 months post-partum in rural Vietnam. J Paediatr Child Health. 2005;41(7):338–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen TT, Nguyen PH, Hajeebhoy N, Nguyen HV, Frongillo EA. Infant and young child feeding practices differ by ethnicity of vietnamese mothers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:214.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. UNICEF. Data by topic and country. Vietnam. Available at: https://data.unicef.org/country/vnm/#/. Accessed 13/12/2021.

  24. World Health Organization. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44368/9789241599757_eng.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 06/07/2022.

  25. Nguyen PTK, Tran HT, Thai TTT, Foster K, Roberts CL, Marais BJ. Factors associated with breastfeeding intent among mothers of newborn babies in Da Nang, Viet Nam. Int Breastfeed J. 2018;13:2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Karimi FZ, Sadeghi R, Maleki-Saghooni N, Khadivzadeh T. The effect of mother-infant skin to skin contact on success and duration of first breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;58(1):1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li Z, Mannava P, Murray JCS, Sobel HL, Jatobatu A, Calibo A, et al. Association between early essential newborn care and breastfeeding outcomes in eight countries in Asia and the Pacific: a cross-sectional observational -study. BMJ Global Health. 2020;5(8):e002581.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. World Health Organization. Introducing and sustaining EENC in hospitals: routine childbirth and newborn care. Available at: https://iris.wpro.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665.1/13409/9789290617808-eng.pdf. Accessed 29/12/2021.

  29. World Health Organization. Exclusive breastfeeding for optimal growth, development and health of infants. Available at: https://www.who.int/elena/titles/exclusive_breastfeeding/en/. Accessed 15/12/2021.

  30. Sharma A, Minh Duc NT, Luu Lam Thang T, Nam NH, Ng SJ, Abbas KS, et al. A Consensus-Based checklist for reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(10):3179–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. National Institute of Nutrition-UNICEF. A review of the nutrition situation in Vietnam 2009–2010. Available at: http://viendinhduong.vn/FileUpload/Documents/010711_044347tinh_hinh_dinh_duong_viet_nam_2009-2010.pdf. Accessed 16/12/2021.

  32. The United Nations Children’s Fund. State of the World’s children 2019. Page 219. New York, NY, USA: Comunications Division UNICEF; 2019.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Alayón S, Varela V, Mukuria-Ashe A, Alvey J, Milner E, Pedersen S, et al. Exclusive breastfeeding: measurement to match the global recommendation. Matern Child Nutr. 2022;18(4):e13409.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hector DJ. Complexities and subtleties in the measurement and reporting of breastfeeding practices. Int Breastfeed J. 2011;6:5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Aarts C, Kylberg E, Hörnell A, Hofvander Y, Gebre-Medhin M, Greiner T. How exclusive is exclusive breastfeeding? A comparison of data since birth with current status data. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29(6):1041–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nguyen P, Binns CW, Ha AVV, Chu TK, Nguyen LC, Duong DV, et al. Prelacteal and early formula feeding increase risk of infant hospitalisation: a prospective cohort study. Arch Dis Child. 2020;105(2):122–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Piwoz EG, Huffman SL. The impact of marketing of breast-milk substitutes on WHO-recommended breastfeeding practices. FoodNutr Bull. 2015;36(4):373–86.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nguyen TT, Weissman A, Cashin J, Ha TT, Zambrano P, Mathisen R. Assessing the effectiveness of policies relating to breastfeeding promotion, protection, and support in Southeast Asia: protocol for a mixed methods study. JMIR Res Protocols. 2020;9(9):e21286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Noughabi ZS, Tehrani SG, Foroushani AR, Nayeri F, Baheiraei A. Prevalence and factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months of life in Tehran: a population-based study. East Mediterr Health J. 2014;20(1):24–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Doan TTD, Binns C, Pham NM, Zhao Y, Dinh TPH, Bui TTH, et al. Improving breastfeeding by empowering mothers in Vietnam: a randomised controlled trial of a Mobile App. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(15):5552.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Faisal Khowaja, American University of the Caribbean, School of Medicine, Sint Maarten, for helping us to proofread this paper. We thank Dr. Casey Culbertson (Pediatrician, San Diego, California, United States) for the thoroughly edited English of our manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Funds for Science and Technology Development of the University of Danang under project number B2020-DN01-28.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine and Pharmacy, The University of Danang, Danang, Vietnam

    Hoang Thi Nam Giang, Do Thi Thuy Duy, Thu Thi Pham, Le Tho Minh Hieu, Nguyen Thi Tuong Vi, Bui Minh Triet, Nguyen Tan Thach & Tran Thi Bach Truc

  2. University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Nguyen Lam Vuong, Nguyen Tran Minh Duc, Trinh Thi Diem Le & Tran Thi Tuyet Nga

  3. Thai Nguyen University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam

    Nguyen Thi Tu Ngoc

  4. School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan

    Nguyen Tien Huy

Authors
  1. Hoang Thi Nam Giang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Do Thi Thuy Duy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nguyen Lam Vuong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nguyen Thi Tu Ngoc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thu Thi Pham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nguyen Tran Minh Duc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Trinh Thi Diem Le
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tran Thi Tuyet Nga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Le Tho Minh Hieu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Nguyen Thi Tuong Vi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Bui Minh Triet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Nguyen Tan Thach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Tran Thi Bach Truc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Nguyen Tien Huy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors performed the research. HTNG designed the research study, analysed data and wrote the first draught of the study. NTH and NLV provided major revisions. DTTD, NLV, NTTN, TTP, NTMD, TTDL, TTTN, LTMH, NTTV, BMT, NTT, TTBT, NTH provided study revisions and reviewed content for technical accuracy. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hoang Thi Nam Giang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval and informed consent

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City according to Decision No. 990 / HĐĐĐ-ĐHYD date 11 / 01 / 2020. The surveys were anonymous to protect the identities of both the mother and infant.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giang, H.T.N., Duy, D.T.T., Vuong, N.L. et al. Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of an infant’s life and associated factors in a low–middle income country. Int Breastfeed J 18, 47 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-023-00585-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-023-00585-x

Keywords

International Breastfeeding Journal

ISSN: 1746-4358