Skip to main content

Advertisement

“Everybody breastfeeds if they have milk”: factors that shape exclusive breastfeeding practices in informal settlements of Mumbai, India

Abstract

Background

In India, though breastfeeding is universally practiced, exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) rates in urban informal settlements are low; and health programs face several challenges in promoting EBF. In this study, ensconced in one program area of a non-government organization, we focused on “positive deviant”- mothers who were able to practice EBF for six months and attempted to delineate factors that shaped their EBF practices. Typically, qualitative research from Lower and Middle Income countries on EBF has focused on understanding why women do not practice EBF; the converse perspective taken in this study has been less explored.

Methods

We employed the positive deviance approach which contends that important programmatic learnings can be attained from persons who adopt positive behaviours. We conducted twenty-five diverse, purposively sampled case-studies of “positive deviant” mothers from two urban informal settlements in Mumbai; and analysed these using a framework approach. The results were summarised using a socioecological framework (consisting of individual, interpersonal, organizational and environment levels).

Results

We found that mothers typically construed EBF as not giving breastmilk substitutes. Giving the infant minor supplements (water, honey) was not considered a violation of the EBF practice. The main themes that emerged as influencers of EBF included: at individual level, perceptions of having adequate milk; at interpersonal level, having role models who practiced EBF and having family support; at organizational level, advice from health workers (which was purported to play a secondary role); and at environmental level, financial constraints that limited access to supplements. One important finding was that women who practiced EBF could not always do it optimally; we encountered several instances of “poor EBF” practices, where mothers had breastfed infants inconsistently, allowing for long gaps between feeds, and had continued EBF even after six months.

Conclusions

There is an urgent need for health programs to clarify the meaning of EBF and counsel against “poor EBF” practices. Messages received by women from immediate family on EBF were powerful and families play an important role in the actualization of optimal EBF practices. Hence, it is imperative to counsel entire families on EBF rather than women alone.

Background

Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is defined as giving no food to the infant except breastmilk except oral rehydration solution, vitamins, minerals or medicines for the first six months of life [1]. Despite the recommendation of EBF for six months as a universal standard, and its proven links to improved child survival and reduced morbidity [2,3,4,5]; only 37–39% of infants in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs) are breastfeeding exclusively [6, 7].

In India, breastfeeding is a universal practice. India meets the globally recommended target for EBF [8] and recent national surveys estimate EBF rates in the country to be about 55% [9]. However, studies of urban informal settlements (slums) from different parts of India have estimated much lower rates, ranging from 8 to 37% [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Moreover, in the state of Maharashtra, where this study is located, urban EBF rates have been almost stagnant in the past decade, 49.9% in 2004 and 51.3% in 2014 [9, 16]. This study is based in two informal settlements of Mumbai (Maharashtra state, India), in the field areas of the Society for Nutrition, Education and Health Action (SNEHA), a Non-Government Organization (NGO) based in Mumbai that works in the field of Maternal and Child Health. A recent evaluation of one nutrition program at SNEHA had shown a positive impact on EBF rates at around 67% in intervention areas in the end line compared to 49% in the baseline [17]. However, program implementers at SNEHA have reported difficulties in enhancing EBF rates further- in spite of intensive counselling by programs frontline workers. This research was an attempt to derive some lessons for improving current program interventions on EBF.

In this study, we explored why some women were able to exclusively breastfeed, in an environment where other feeds like milk of other origin, formula, water, and traditional preparations were commonly given to infants before six months of age. This approach was rooted in the ideas of “positive deviance” evaluation [18] which contends that important program lessons can be learnt from people who adopt positive behaviours. In our study, we defined positive deviants as mothers who were able to practice EBF for six months.

Current literature on EBF and gaps

A vast expanse of literature exists on factors that affect EBF practices from diverse contexts. Quantitative studies have shown that EBF rates were influenced by mother’s education, age, and employment; infant’s age, sex; access to healthcare; neighbourhood of residence; and exposure to mass media or counselling [19,20,21,22,23]. The direction and magnitudes of these associations were, however, not universal, and these point towards a strong influence of context-specific mechanisms on EBF practices. One of the most cited barriers to EBF across different types of studies and contexts- was the perceived inadequacy of breastmilk for the child [12, 24,25,26]. While studies have highlighted lack of knowledge on EBF practices as a barrier [11, 27], there was some evidence that mothers did not practice EBF despite having knowledge [28,29,30]. In addition, the recent growing body of qualitative studies has been particularly useful in delineating nuances of factors affecting EBF practices. In Zambia, in the context of high death-rates due to HIV, the fear of dying and leaving behind a child dependent only on breastmilk has been reported as a strong barrier to the practice of EBF [31]. In urban Kenya, the experience of hunger led mothers to perceive their milk as insufficient; and food insecurity appeared to be seminal in deterring EBF [28]. In Pakistan, mothers adhered to traditional practices of giving prelacteal feeds despite medical advice given against these [32]. In Lebanon, women have expressed deep-rooted cultural concerns about breastmilk having the potential for being “bad milk” that might be nutritionally inadequate or even harmful to the baby [33]. Clearly, the practice of EBF and factors influencing it are rooted in the sociocultural, geographical and economic milieu in which mothers live.

However, so far, qualitative research in this field has typically focussed on understanding why women do not practice EBF. The converse perspective, what enables women who EBF to do so, has been less explored in literature from LMICs. We found only one study that focussed explicitly on a woman who practiced EBF [34]. We felt that focussing on women who practiced EBF in our setting, and elucidating factors that enabled them to do so would yield rich insights into the practice of EBF, and thus, enable programs to design more contextualized interventions on breastfeeding.

Methods

Research methods

An exploratory qualitative research design was used, wherein the perspectives of mothers who exclusively breastfed their infants was sought through in-depth interviews.

Study setting

This study was conducted among mothers residing in two selected areas within urban informal settlements in Mankhurd and Govandi, Mumbai city (see Table 1). In these areas, the programs implemented by SNEHA had been running for six months at the time of the study.

Table 1 Demographic and health characteristics of the population from the urban informal settlements chosen for the study

Selection of participants

To identify mothers who had exclusively breastfed their children, we used data from a baseline survey done in March 2016. The initial plan for participant selection was to use the baseline survey to locate mothers who practiced EBF, and select a purposive, maximum diversity sample from this group. However, in the field, we found that several mothers, who had been identified in the survey as practising EBF, had actually given some supplements. This overestimation could be attributed, to a large extent, to the use of a single 24-h dietary recall interview technique used in the baseline survey to estimate EBF rates. Other studies have also reported similar overestimations [35, 36]. Hence, we modified our participant selection strategy; we used a list of mothers who practiced EBF as per the survey, and further verified with them if they had given any supplements to the infant before conducting the interviews. We purposively selected participants from different age-groups, parity, education and household structure, since we felt that this heterogeneity would help illuminate different dimensions of the EBF phenomenon (see Table 2). For this study, we conducted 25 interviews; after the first 15 interviews, we did not come across major new themes. Since the program area was new, participant mothers’ exposure to advice from community health workers of our program was limited (some had been visited 1 or 2 times by the program workers).

Table 2 Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants from the selected urban informal settlements, Mumbai (n = 25)

Data collection

Authors 1 and 2 conducted the interviews with mothers between January–May 2017 (One research intern also accompanied them for some interviews, but she did not conduct any interviews independently). Interviews were conducted in Hindi and Marathi within the houses of the respondents. The average duration of the interviews was 45 min. Participant mothers were asked about their understanding of EBF; sources of information and advice on EBF; and about barriers and enablers to the practice of EBF (see Table 2 for a summary of themes). All interviews were voice-recorded, translated and transcribed verbatim into English, and pseudonymized. We analysed the data through “framework” analyses techniques [37], wherein the analytical emphasis was on drawing interpretations through data reduction (selecting and sorting data systematically) followed by data display (organizing the sorted data into a case by theme matrix). For data reduction, the two researchers who had collected the data sifted through the first eight transcripts, affixed preliminary codes, and developed a coding index. Initial data analyses suggested that the themes that emerged in our study could be organized into a modified socioecological framework (refer Fig. 1). This framework contends that behaviours such as the practice of EBF were influenced by the interaction of factors at various levels: individual level (mother and child); interpersonal level (family, peers and friends); organizational level (systemic interventions on health and nutrition); and environmental level (social and economic factors) After the initial framework was discussed and agreed upon by all study investigators, two researchers independently coded the data using NVivo (version 10), and discussed dissimilarities, to ensure consistency in the application of the coding process.

Fig. 1
figure1

Why mothers did not give major breastmilk supplements

Results

Defining EBF for the study

There was no literal translation available for the term “exclusive breastfeeding” in the local language; participant mothers were asked “You did not give anything to your infant besides your breastmilk for 6 months. Could you please tell us why?”. Initial analyses revealed that for many women in our context, EBF primarily implied not using breastmilk substitutes (milk of other origin, commercial formula or semi solids). Many mothers, who had occasionally given the infant water, prelacteal feeds like honey or traditional medicines- claimed to practice EBF; since these were not considered as “substitutes” for breastmilk.

Despite our best efforts to screen out mothers who had given water, honey or traditional medicines to the infant, we found during our detailed conversation with them that some of these had been given occasionally- though in minimal quantities. Two mothers had given honey and sugar-water as prelacteal feeds; some mothers had given water only in summer; and traditional medicines like ghutti (herbal tonic) were used if the infant had stomach-ache. Some mothers could not recall with certainty. Due to issues of recall, we only analysed why these mothers did not resort to giving major breastmilk supplements during the first six months.Footnote 1

Why did mothers not give major supplements to the infant for 6 months?

We have used a socioecological framework to summarise the reasons mothers put forth for practising exclusive breastfeeding (Fig. 1). The different factors are detailed below:

Individual level

Perceived adequacy of breastmilk by mother

In twenty cases, mothers perceived themselves as having adequate breastmilk to satisfy the infants’ needs and hence did not introduce supplements. There was a strong belief that breastmilk was God’s gift and only women who did not have breastmilk must resort to supplements. Mothers perceived their diet to be linked to the quality and quantity of breastmilk produced by them. Women who exclusively breastfed tried to take additional care of their diet; and sometimes took herbal supplements to make their milk better:

“For milk production, I eat a lot of pulses. They say- if you drink porridge made of pulses, there is increased milk flow; so, I drink porridge made of different pulses. Then I eat fruits, a cashew-almond mixture… so that the child gets good milk. So, I have a good flow of milk.” (Age 20 years, two children).

The perception of having adequate breastmilk was strongly linked to the time of introduction of complementary foods:

“I will feed depending on the availability of milk. If milk is there for 6 months, then I will give for 6 months. If milk is not produced, then I will give outside milk … (milk from other sources).” (Age 22 years, one child).

As long as breastmilk was perceived to be available, mothers did not feel the need for introducing complementary feeds. This had an unintended negative consequence, since several mothers in our sample did not stop practising EBF even after six months.

Perceived benefits of breastmilk

Most mothers were aware of the benefits of breastmilk, and pointed out that breastmilk made children strong and imparted immunity:

“Because of breastmilk, there is strength in the body. Otherwise, when kids are born. .. they fall, their hands and legs break, outside milk doesn’t have that much strength. The strength (that) is there in the mother’s milk, that is obviously not there in outside milk.” (Age 35 years, four children).

Some women felt that supplements were difficult for the infants to digest. However, while mothers pointed out the benefits of breastmilk, they could not tell us the benefits of EBF specifically.

Babies refused supplements

Eight mothers reported that they had tried to introduce supplements (either cow’s milk or popular commercial brands of supplements); but the infant had refused to comply and hence they had no choice but to breastfeed exclusively. Supplements were generally tried by these mothers during times when they had felt that their breastmilk was inadequate or when the mother had other chores to attend to and did not have time to breastfeed.

Infant was satiated

Most mothers took cues from the behaviour of the infant to introduce supplements. Mothers reported that the infant being happy, sleeping well, and not demanding food, were signs that it was getting adequate nourishment.

Interpersonal factors

Role models who breastfed exclusively

In the study, almost all women breastfed because they had seen it being practiced in their families; mothers, sisters, mothers-in-laws and sisters-in-laws were role models for breastfeeding. The norm was to breastfeed exclusively as long as milk was perceived as adequate. Some participants reported that their families encouraged them to continue breastfeeding-even during challenging circumstances such as ill-health. Table 3 delineates the case of a woman who coped with her anxiety of having insufficient milk and practiced EBF due to reassurance from immediate family.

Table 3 Case study of a woman who exclusively breastfed because it was a family endorsed practice; she had family support; as well as the financial resources to cope with the anxiety of milk inadequacy

Family support for EBF

Eighteen mothers reported some form of family support which they perceived as essential to their ability to practice EBF:

“Yes, I think without their (family) support, it would have not been possible to exclusively breastfeed my children. Without them, I would not be able to do this. .. should I cook food or look after the children or do household chores, or drop (the other) children to school? You get caught up with several such things. ..” (Age 23 years, having three children).

Participant mothers reported receiving support from their family, in terms of post delivery care, provision of cooked food, care of other children, and other household chores.

Organizational factors

Advice from professionals

Twenty women reported being exposed to some form of medical advice on EBF from medical doctors, nurses or community health workers. Advice from doctors and nurses was given at the hospital during delivery, and women reported feeding colostrum and avoiding external prelacteal feeds in accordance to this advice. Women revealed that community health workers who did home visits also advised them on EBF. Some mothers also mentioned a government phone application which sent them reminders on breastfeeding and immunization.

However, despite being exposed to advice on EBF from various sources, we found that, usually, this advice was not central to women’s decisions on the practice of EBF. Exclusive breastfeeding decisions appeared to be based primarily on factors such as family support and endorsement and perceived availability of milk, rather than on professional advice. Only in three cases, we found that women had gone against their family norms (of introducing other feeds) and had followed medical advice on EBF. In one case, the mother was a graduate and she acknowledged that medical advice had value. In the other two cases, the mothers had previously experienced deaths of their infants; and this experience made them more amenable to medical advice (see Table 4 for an illustrative case).

Table 4 How an adverse event in a woman’s life induced her to defy family norms, listen to medical advice and practice EBF

Environmental factors

Social and economic context

Women in our sample referred to urban migration and poverty as factors that affected their decisions to exclusively breastfeed. We encountered two pathways through which these contextual factors affected EBF. One, some mothers perceived that urban transfers worsened poverty, due to lack of job security of spouse, lack of financial support from immediate family, and inability to withstand sudden crisis. Under these circumstances, mothers felt that their diet was considerably restricted and that their breastmilk would be insufficient for the child. However, these women also felt that they could not always afford to buy supplements and hence they breastfed exclusively. In such cases, we often came across “poor EBF” practices, where the mother did not feed the infant consistently; or on demand; and left long gaps between feeds. (Tables 5 and 6 illustrate cases of poor EBF practices).

Table 5 Case of a mother, recent migrant who struggled with issues of basic survival and poverty, and believed she had no option but to exclusively breastfeed
Table 6 Case of a woman who was abused; had a malnourished infant and reported practising EBF in an inconsistent manner

In contrast, we also came across some mothers who felt that migration to the urban region had actually improved their economic conditions. They perceived urban workload and lifestyles to be easier than rural ones. (Table 4 illustrates a case where, in addition to other factors, the mother felt that her migration to Mumbai was conducive to the practice of EBF, since her workload was easier, enabling her to concentrate on child-rearing.)

The infant was exclusively breastfed till about she was a year old. The mother also admits that she was often not able breastfeed frequently, and was pre-occupied with other household issues.

Discussion

This study contributes to extant literature on EBF in two ways. Firstly, previous research on EBF has not given explicit and focussed attention to women who practiced it. We felt that the perspectives of women who practiced EBF and the range of factors that enabled them to do so called for detailed, nuanced exploration. This has been attempted through the 25 rich and diverse case-studies of women in this paper. Secondly, studies on EBF have typically been structured around the technocratic definition of the concept. However, recent literature has pointed out that mothers do not really understand the term “EBF” clearly [26, 38]. In this study, we have attempted to derive a community-contextualized definition of EBF, and hence, examined how mothers practiced it. In our study, women mainly understood EBF as not giving breastmilk substitutes such as milk of other origin or formula or complementary food- to the infant before six months. Giving minor supplements such as occasional sips of water was not considered a violation of EBF practices.

Some of our findings on factors affecting EBF reverberate with those found in other qualitative studies. The need for perceived adequacy of breastmilk has been reported consistently in studies across diverse cultural settings and contexts [12, 24,25,26, 39]. In our sample, we also found an underlying anxiety about the adequacy of milk for the infant. Most women in our sample coped with this anxiety by strengthening their diets as best as they could.

The importance of family support for breastfeeding and the existence of “role-models” who practiced EBF have also been seen as important enablers [32, 40, 41]. We also found this to be the case in our study. In our study, the key source of knowledge for women on breastfeeding was family. The practice of not giving other milk or formula, as long as breastmilk was perceived as adequate, was culturally sanctioned rather than advocated for the biomedical benefits that EBF had. Mothers were generally aware of the benefits of breastmilk, though not specifically about EBF.

Literature from other contexts has shown that access to healthcare in the antenatal and postnatal periods, as well as counselling and exposure to mass media promotes EBF [11, 21, 42, 43]. A study exploring factors that led to improvement in EBF rates among women enrolled in a large-scale child nutrition program found that EBF rates were higher among those who received counselling services from community health workers and attended group sessions offered by the program implementers [44].

Many women in our study reported receiving messages on EBF from health professionals, particularly doctors and nurses during the time of childbirth. However, they did not perceive messages from these professionals as strong influencers of their decisions on EBF. Only when confidence in traditional ideas of feeding the child was broken due to adverse events, was importance given to medical advice on EBF (we encountered two such cases). In general, the study findings implied that messages from professionals play a secondary role in comparison to the messages on breastfeeding mothers receive from immediate family and peers. Also, our findings indicated that support from immediate family plays an important role in the actualization of optimal EBF practices. All this clearly underscores the need to counsel entire families on EBF practices, rather than mothers alone.

We used a broad socioecological framework for analysing factors affecting EBF (similar to Hector et al. 2005 [45] and adapted it as themes emerged from the case studies. Such ecological frameworks have been used in previous breastfeeding literature from LMICs [28, 30]. This study reiterates the applicability of socioecological frameworks in studying EBF practices. In addition to distinct factors in the framework, we felt that it was important to acknowledge the complex interactions between these factors that led to EBF. Some of these interactions have been captured in the four illustrative case studies. These case studies explicate how, under different circumstances and with different mothers, the factors in the ecological framework interact, negate or complement one another to influence EBF practices.

We paid attention to two broad contextual factors, poverty and migration, since these emerged frequently during discussions with study participants. The overarching role of poverty and subsequent food insecurity in influencing EBF has been underscored in literature [28, 46, 47]. In our context, poverty and migration combined to influence EBF through two broad pathways. Some women believed that urban migration had improved the family’s economic prospects as urban workstyles offered more leisure time than rural, and this enabled them to spend more time with the infant and practice EBF. Other women perceived migration to exacerbate poverty and further restrict access to food and supplements for the infant. These women practiced EBF despite being apprehensive about the quality of their breastmilk, because they believed themselves to have no choice. Akin to this mechanism is the one described by Lesorogol et al. 2017 [47] as “last resort EBF” in Haiti, wherein poor economic conditions forced women to EBF.

A combination of poverty, lack of access to financial resources, being young, having multiple children, and sometimes dealing with violence puts extreme pressure on mothers who practiced EBF as a “last resort”. Exclusive breastfeeding in such cases, was done mainly because mothers perceived themselves as having no choice without an explicit understanding of EBF and belief in its value. These mothers often did not do justice to the practice of EBF as presupposed in international prescriptions of the concept. Mothers reported and we observed instances wherein children were left unfed for long hours (Table 5 and 6). Such EBF practices can have adverse effects on the health of infants. Given this, we feel that in contexts similar to ours, it is important to not just advocate EBF, but focus strongly on “good EBF” practices. Women need support not just to practice EBF, but to practice EBF well, in a manner that is optimal to the infants’ health.

We discuss below two limitations of our study. First, it was difficult for women to recall the use of minor supplements with certainty. We feel that a different approach such as longitudinally following up with women to see if they practiced EBF, might elicit better evidence on minor supplements. The methodology we used worked best when we defined EBF from the women’s point of view, as not giving major breastmilk substitutes, rather than adhere to a strict technocratic definition of EBF.

Second, in the cultural set up of the particular urban informal settlements we drew our sample from, women were generally not employed outside the house. Women, during certain seasons, took up part-time work like embroidery on clothes/stitching to earn some income, but rarely left the house. Women in these settings were mostly dependent on their spouses for finances. Hence, we could not explore links between mother’s employment and EBF, an aspect that has been seen as important in other contexts [23, 26, 28].

Conclusion

Table 7 presents key learnings for health programs from our study. In summary, we perceive a strong need for messaging on EBF in our programs and beyond so as to explicate the meaning of EBF in communities. Messages must concentrate on the promotion of “good” EBF practices, like feeding on demand and with consistency; and also address issues of late weaning. Programs need to focus on counselling families rather than only the mother on EBF.

Table 7 Key messages for health programs

Notes

  1. 1.

    Eleven mothers among our participants confidently denied giving their infant any minor supplements. The reasons given by them were: Other family role models did not use any such supplements; The infant was born during winter/rainy season and did not need water; The infant did not get any stomach ache or colic- and hence did not need supplements; Honey and other traditional medicines were not affordable. Women also reported receiving medical advice against minor supplements from doctors and nurses in the hospital when they delivered. This advice appeared to play an important role in minimising pre-lacteal feeds when women were in the hospital after delivery; but was not taken very seriously thereafter. Due to difficulty in recall, we could not analyse these results in detail.

Abbreviations

EBF:

Exclusive breastfeeding

LMIC:

Lower and Middle Income Countries

NGO:

Non-Governmental Organization

SNEHA:

Society for Nutrition, Education and Health Action

References

  1. 1.

    World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Baby and Young Child Feeding. Geneva: WHO; 2003.

  2. 2.

    Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, De Onis M, Ezzati M, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet. 2008;371(9608):243–60.

  3. 3.

    Jones G, Steketee RW, Black RE, Bhutta ZA, Morris SS And Bellagio child survival study group. How many child deaths can we prevent this year? Lancet 2003; 362 (9377): 65–71.

  4. 4.

    Kramer MS, Kakuma R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;8:CD003517.

  5. 5.

    Arifeen S, Black RE, Antelman G, Baqui A, Caulfield L, Becker S. Exclusive breastfeeding reduces acute respiratory infection and diarrhea deaths among infants in Dhaka slums. Pediatrics. 2002;108(4):E67.

  6. 6.

    Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Victora CG, de Onís M, Barros AJ. Breastfeeding patterns and exposure to suboptimal breastfeeding among children in developing countries: review and analysis of nationally representative surveys. BMC Med. 2004;2:26.

  7. 7.

    Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, França GVA, Horton S, Krasevec J, Rollins NC. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387(100017):475–90.

  8. 8.

    WHO and UNICEF. Global Nutrition Targets 2025; Breastfeeding Policy Brief 2014. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/149022/1/WHO_NMH_NHD_14.7_eng.pdf.

  9. 9.

    International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). National Family Health Survey-4, 2015–16. Factsheets. Mumbai. IIPS.2016.

  10. 10.

    Aneja B, Singh P, Tandon M, Pathak P, Singh C, Kapil U. Etiological factors of malnutrition among infants in two urban slums of Delhi. Indian Pediatr. 2001;38(2):160–5.

  11. 11.

    Twari R, Mahajan PC, Lahariya C. The determinants of exclusive breastfeeding in urban slums: a community based study. J Trop Pediatr. 2009;55(1):49–54.

  12. 12.

    Roy S, Dasgupta A, Pal B. Feeding practices of children in an urban slum of Kolkata. Indian J Community Med. 2009;34(4):362–3.

  13. 13.

    Bagul AS, Supare MS. The infant feeding practices in an urban slum of Nagpur, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012;6(9):1525–7.

  14. 14.

    Nimbalka AS, Shukla VV, Pathak AG, Nimbalkar SM. Newborn care practices and health seeking behaviour in urban slums and villages of Anand, Gujarat. Indian Paediatr. 2013;50(4):408–10.

  15. 15.

    Velusamy V, Premkumar PS, Kang G. Exclusive breastfeeding practices among mothers in urban slum settlements: pooled analysis from three prospective birth cohort studies in South India. Int Breastfeed J. 2017;12:35.

  16. 16.

    International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). National Family Health Survey-3, 2005–6. Mumbai: IIPS; 2007.

  17. 17.

    Shah More N, Waingankar A, Ramani S, Chanani S, D'Souza V, Pantvaidya S, et al. Community-based management of acute malnutrition to reduce wasting in urban informal settlements of Mumbai, India: a mixed-methods evaluation. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018;6:103–27.

  18. 18.

    Marsh DR, Schroeder DG, Dearden KA, Sternin J, Sternin M. The power of positive deviance. BMJ. 2004;329(7475):1177–9.

  19. 19.

    Martines JC, Ashworth A, Kirkwood B. Breast-feeding among the urban poor in southern Brazil: reasons for termination in the first 6 months of life. Bull World Health Org. 1989;67(2):151–61.

  20. 20.

    Kimani-Murage EW, Madise NJ, Fotso JC, Kyobutungi C, Mutua MK, Gitau TM, et al. Patterns and determinants of breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices in urban informal settlements, Nairobi Kenya. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:396.

  21. 21.

    Tamiru D, Aragu D, Belachew T. Survey on the introduction of complementary foods to infants within the first six months and associated factors in rural communities of Jimma Arjo. Int J of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2013;2(2):77–84.

  22. 22.

    Setegn T, Belachew T, Gerbaba M, Deribe K, Deribew A, Biadgilign S. Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding practices among mothers in Goba district, south East Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Int Breastfeed J. 2012;7:17.

  23. 23.

    Mekuria G, Edris M. Exclusive breastfeeding and associated factors among mothers in Debre Markos, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Int Breastfeed J. 2015;10:1.

  24. 24.

    Kulkarni RN, Anjenaya S, Gujar R. Breast feeding practices in an urban community of Kalamboli, Navi Mumbai. Indian J Community Med. 2004;29(4):179–85.

  25. 25.

    Haider R, Rasheed S, Sanghvi TG, Hassan N, Pachon H, Islam S, et al. Breastfeeding in infancy: identifying the program-relevant issues in Bangladesh. Int Breastfeed J. 2010;5:21.

  26. 26.

    Mogre V, Dery M, Gaa PK. Knowledge, attitudes and determinants of exclusive breastfeeding practice among Ghanaian rural lactating mothers. Int Breastfeed J. 2016;11:12.

  27. 27.

    Kuzma J. Knowledge, attitude and practice related to infant feeding among women in rural Papua New Guinea: a descriptive, mixed methods study. Int Breastfeed J. 2013;8:16.

  28. 28.

    Kimani-Murage EW, Wekesah F, Wanjohi M, Kyobutungi C, Ezeh AC, Musoke RN, et al. Factors affecting actualisation of the WHO breastfeeding recommendations in urban poor settings in Kenya: breastfeeding challenges in urban poor settings. Matern Child Nutr. 2015;11(3):314–32.

  29. 29.

    Lee HM, Durham J, Booth J, Sychareun V. A qualitative study on the breastfeeding experiences of first-time mothers in Vientiane, Lao PDR. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:223.

  30. 30.

    Thet MM, Khaing EE, Diamond-Smith N, Sudhinaraset M, Oo S, Aung T. Barriers to exclusive breastfeeding in the Ayeyarwaddy region in Myanmar: qualitative findings from mothers, grandmothers, and husbands. Appetite. 2016;96:62–9.

  31. 31.

    Fjeld E, Siziya S, Katepa-Bwalya M, PromiseEBF study group. “No sister, the breast alone is not enough for my baby” a qualitative assessment of potentials and barriers in the promotion of exclusive breastfeeding in southern Zambia. Int Breastfeed J. 2008;3:26.

  32. 32.

    Dykes F, Lhussier M, Bangash S, Zaman M, Lowe N. Exploring and optimising maternal and infant nutrition in north West Pakistan. Midwifery. 2012;28(6):831–5.

  33. 33.

    Osman H, El Zein L, Wick L. Cultural beliefs that may discourage breastfeeding among Lebanese women: a qualitative analysis. Int Breastfeed J. 2009;4:12.

  34. 34.

    Charlick SJ, Fielder A, Pincombe J, McKellar L. Determined to breastfeed: a case study of exclusive breastfeeding using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Women Birth. 2017;30(4):325–31.

  35. 35.

    Aarts C, Kylberg E, Hörnell A, Hofvander Y, Gebre-Medhin M, Greiner T. How exclusive is exclusive breastfeeding? A comparison of data since birth with current status data. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29(6):1041–6.

  36. 36.

    Fenta EH, Yirgu R, Shikur B, Gebreyesus SH. A single 24 h recall overestimates exclusive breastfeeding practices among infants aged less than six months in rural Ethiopia. Int Breastfeeding J. 2017;12:36.

  37. 37.

    Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research by Jane Ritchie and Liz Spencer in A. Bryman and R. G. Burgess [eds.]. 1994.

  38. 38.

    Still R, Marais D, Hollis JL. Mothers' understanding of the term 'exclusive breastfeeding': a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 2017;13(3):e12336.

  39. 39.

    Olang B, Heidarzadeh A, Strandvik B, Yngve A. Reasons given by mothers for discontinuing breastfeeding in Iran. Int Breastfeed J. 2012;7:7.

  40. 40.

    Agunbiade OM, Ogunleye OV. Constraints to exclusive breastfeeding practice among breastfeeding mothers in Southwest Nigeria: implications for scaling up. Int Breastfeed J. 2012;7:5.

  41. 41.

    Safon C, Keene D, Guevara WJU, Kiani S, Herkert D, Muñoz EE, et al. Determinants of perceived insufficient milk among new mothers in León, Nicaragua. Matern Child Nutr. 2016;13(3):e12369.

  42. 42.

    Bashour HN, Kharouf MH, Abdulsalam AA, El Asmar K, Tabbaa MA, Cheikha SA. Effect of postnatal home visits on maternal/infant outcomes in Syria: a randomized controlled trial. Public Health Nurs. 2008;25(2):115–25.

  43. 43.

    Jama NA, Wilford A, Masango Z, Haskins L, Coutsoudis A, Spies L, et al. Enablers and barriers to success among mothers planning to exclusively breastfeed for six months: a qualitative prospective cohort study in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Int Breastfeed J. 2017;12:43.

  44. 44.

    Chanani S, Waingankar A, Shah More N, Pantvaidya S, Fernandez A, Jayaraman A. Participation of pregnant women in a community-based nutrition program in Mumbai's informal settlements: effect on exclusive breastfeeding practices. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0195619.

  45. 45.

    Hector D, King L, Webb K, Heywood P. Factors affecting breastfeeding practices: applying a conceptual framework. N S W Public Health Bull. 2005;16:52–5.

  46. 46.

    Goudet SM, Kimani-Murage EW, Wekesah F, Wanjohi M, Griffiths PL, Bogin B, et al. How does poverty affect children’s nutritional status in Nairobi slums? A qualitative study of the root causes of under nutrition. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(4):608–19.

  47. 47.

    Lesorogol C, Bond C, Dulience SJL, Iannotti L. Economic determinants of breastfeeding in Haiti: the effects of poverty, food insecurity, and employment on exclusive breastfeeding in an urban population. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;14(2):e12524.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the mothers residing in SNEHA implementation area who made the study possible through their participation. We are thankful to the funders for supporting this study. We are thankful to the Sneha Centre implementation team for helping us locate the mothers in the community. We are thankful to Sheetal Ranjan for her research support. Finally, we are thankful to members of the SNEHA Research Group and the SNEHA trustees.

Funding

EPIC Foundation, Quadrivium Foundation and HBS Foundation.

Availability of data and materials

The data analysed during the current study can be made available by the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

AJ, NS, and SR discussed the scope of the paper initially and the study was designed by SR and NS. Data collection was done primarily by NS with support from SR. Data analyses was done by NS and SR- and results were discussed with all the authors. AJ provided critical review and commentary to revisions of the manuscript. All authors have reviewed the manuscript. AJ has primary responsibility for final content of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Anuja Jayaraman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was granted ethical approval by the Institutional Ethics Committee, The Holy Family Hospital & Medical and Research Centre, Bandra, Mumbai [ECR/196/INST/MH/2013]. Written informed consent in local language was taken from all the respondents.

Consent for publication

The manuscript does not have any images, videos or identifiable data of participants. During the informed consent process, a consent form- in local language-has been signed by all 25 case study participants which states that their stories may be published, but their names will not be mentioned. This form is available with the authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Exclusive breastfeeding
  • Qualitative
  • Informal settlements