Open Access

Determinants of breastfeeding initiation among mothers in Sydney, Australia: findings from a birth cohort study

  • Amit Arora1, 2, 3, 4Email author,
  • Narendar Manohar1,
  • Andrew Hayen5,
  • Sameer Bhole3, 6,
  • John Eastwood7,
  • Steven Levy8 and
  • Jane Anne Scott9
International Breastfeeding Journal201712:39

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-017-0130-0

Received: 7 May 2017

Accepted: 7 September 2017

Published: 15 September 2017

Abstract

Background

Breastfeeding has short-term and long-term benefits for both the infant and the mother. The objective of this study was to identify the incidence of breastfeeding initiation among women in South Western Sydney, and the factors associated with the initiation of breastfeeding.

Methods

Child and Family Health Nurses recruited mother-infant dyads (n = 1035) to the Healthy Smiles Healthy Kids birth study in South Western Sydney, an ethnically and socio-economically diverse area, at the first post-natal home visit. A sample of 935 women completed a structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire at 8 weeks. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify those factors independently associated with the initiation of breastfeeding.

Results

In total, 92% of women (n = 860) commenced breastfeeding in hospital. Women who completed a university degree were more likely to initiate breastfeeding compared to those who did not complete high school (AOR = 7.16, 95% CI 2.73, 18.79). Vietnamese women had lower odds of breastfeeding initiation compared to Australian born women (AOR = 0.34. 95% CI 0.13, 0.87). Women who had more than one child were less likely to breastfeed than those who had one child (AOR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.19, 0.79). Women who gave birth via a caesarean section were less likely to breastfeed their baby compared to those who had a vaginal delivery (AOR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.14, 0.52). Women who drank alcohol during pregnancy had 72% lower odds to breastfeed compared to those who did not drink alcohol during pregnancy (AOR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.11, 0.71). Women who reported that their partner preferred breastfeeding were more likely to initiate breastfeeding (AOR = 11.77, 95% CI 5.73, 24.15) and women who had chosen to breastfeed before pregnancy had more than 2.5 times the odds of breastfeeding their baby compared to those women who made their decision either during pregnancy or after labour (AOR = 2.80, 95% CI 1.31, 5.97).

Conclusions

Women with lower levels of education, who consume alcohol during pregnancy, have more than one child, and make infant feeding decision after becoming pregnant, and those born in Vietnam should be targeted when implementing breastfeeding promotion programs. Further, women who deliver by caesarean section require additional breastfeeding support post-delivery and it is important to include fathers in breastfeeding related decisions and encourage them to participate in antenatal programs.

Keywords

Breastfeeding initiation Australia Sydney Cohort study

Background

International recommendations including the World Health Organization (WHO) [1] and the Australian Dietary Guidelines [2] recommend infants should be exclusively breastfed for 6 months and continued further breastfeeding up to 12 months and beyond. These guidelines and recommendations are based on overwhelming evidence highlighting the short-term and the long-term benefits of breastfeeding for both the infant and the mother [3, 4]. Mothers are particularly encouraged to breastfeed as it provides infants with essential nutrients that are required for optimal growth and development and also enhances their immune system [35]. Breastfeeding protects against gastrointestinal and respiratory infections and otitis media in infancy, and reduces the risk of obesity and diabetes later in life [3, 4]. Breastfeeding also plays an important role in reducing infant mortality rates as well as biological and emotional well-being of infant and the mother [36].

Breastfeeding also provides benefits to the mother. Mothers who breastfeed are at a reduced risk for developing postmenopausal breast cancer, have higher bone density after menopause, experience a more timely and efficient return of the uterus to its pre-pregnancy state, and increased weight loss in the postpartum period [37]. Breastfeeding mothers report reduced stress levels, which may be caused by increased prolactin levels [7]. Women who breastfeed have an increased length of time between pregnancies, a decreased risk of ovarian cancer, a decreased risk of postmenopausal hip fracture, and a reduced risk to type 2 diabetes mellitus [37].

Undertaking research on breastfeeding practices is crucial to identify specific population sub-groups of women who decide not to breastfeed and the reasons for not complying with international recommendations. Although a range of factors that influence breastfeeding initiation have been reported in the literature [8], these factors differ across cultures, populations, regions, and countries [912]. In Australia, the incidence of breastfeeding is high (96%) [13], however, the rates vary across ethnic and socio-economic groups. For example, the Perth Infant Feeding Study noted that Australian-born mothers had significantly higher breastfeeding initiation rates in comparison to those born outside Australia [14]. Further, Amir and Donath investigated the changes in breastfeeding initiation rates across three national surveys in Australia and concluded that although breastfeeding initiation rates increased from 86.0% in 1995 to 88.0% in 2004–05 [15], they were consistently lower for women from lower socio-economic backgrounds [15].

South Western Sydney is an ethnically diverse region in New South Wales (NSW), Australia with high levels of social disadvantage [16]. The data related to predictors of breastfeeding initiation in NSW, particularly in South Western Sydney, are limited [17]. For these reasons, it is important to investigate breastfeeding initiation and its associated factors in this region to help to identify strategies to promote and support breastfeeding initiation and to identify women most at risk of not breastfeeding. The aims of this study therefore, were to identify the incidence and determinants of breastfeeding initiation in one of Australia’s most culturally and linguistically diverse communities and to report on the main reasons why mothers do not initiate breastfeeding.

Methods

Study background

This paper analyses data obtained from an ongoing birth cohort study, ‘Healthy Smiles Healthy Kids’, investigating the relationship between early childhood feeding patterns, oral health and obesity among children in South Western Sydney [18]. Women who gave birth to a live infant with no health condition between October 2009 and February 2010 in public hospitals located under the catchment of the former South Western Sydney Area Health Service (now classified as Sydney and South Western Sydney Local Health Districts) were approached to be a part of this study. Child and Family Health Nurses (CFHNs) recruited mother-infant dyads at the first post-natal home visit at 4 to 6 weeks, as this is the primary point of community-based health professional contact for newborn children and their carers/parents [19, 20]. At the first post-natal visit, CFHNs explained the project to the mothers and obtained a written informed consent. If requested, the nurses were able to arrange for interpreter services for non-English speaking parents and language appropriate written materials were provided for the major ethnic groups living in this region (i.e. Vietnamese, Arabic, Assyrian, Cambodian, Cantonese, Hindi, Mandarin, and Samoan).

Data collection

Basic demographic information and infant feeding information were collected via a telephone interview conducted when the child was 8 weeks old. The questionnaire used in this study was adapted from the first and second Perth Infant Feeding studies [21, 22], to determine if breastfeeding had been initiated and identify the factors known or suspected to be linked with breastfeeding initiation.

Outcome variable

Initiation of breastfeeding is defined as a woman having breastfed her child, either from the breast or expressed breast milk, on at least one occasion.

Explanatory variables

A number of independent variables (socio-demographic, biomedical and psychosocial) identified in the literature as being identified as being associated with breastfeeding initiation were investigated (Table 2). ‘Mothers age’ was recorded as a continuous variable and then categorised into groups (<25 years, 25–29 years, 30–34 years, >35 years). Mothers were asked an open-ended question about their ‘occupation’ and these were classified as per the Census occupation codes (Home duties, unskilled, sales/clerical, managers, and professionals). Socio-economic status was defined using the residential postcode which was classified as per the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD), one of the Socio-economic Indexes for Areas developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics [23]. ‘Birthweight’ was recorded as a continuous variable and then categorised into ‘low’ (<2500 g) and ‘average or greater’ (≥2500 g). ‘Parity’ was recorded as a continuous variable and later categorised as ‘primiparous’ and multiparous’. The behaviours ‘smoking during pregnancy’ and ‘alcohol during pregnancy’ were recorded as a ‘yes’ or a ‘no’.

Statistical analysis

Data were entered and analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Version 22 (SPSS for Windows, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine which individual variables could best predict the initiation of breastfeeding. The full model was reduced using the backward stepwise procedure and the fitness of model was assessed at every step to avoid dropping non-significant variables that affected the model fitness. All variables in the final model were variables from which, when excluded, the change in deviance compared with the corresponding Χ 2 test statistic on the relevant degrees of freedom was significant (p < 0.05).

Results

A total of 1500 mothers were invited to participate in this study and 1035 mothers agreed to participate (69% consent). All the mothers who declined to participate (n = 465) were asked three short questions related to their socio-demographic status and chosen method of feeding to allow comparison with the respondents (n = 1035). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to age (X 2 = 4.75, p = 0.153), level of education (X 2 = 6.65, p = 0.328) and chosen method of feeding (X 2 = 2.46, p = 0.813). These findings suggest that the sample was representative of the population from which it was drawn. At the time of the first interview, 100 women either declined to continue with the cohort study or were not contactable after 7 phone attempts on weekdays and/or weekends. While 69% (n = 1035) consented to participate in the study, results were obtained from 62.3% (n = 935). Table 1 shows the socio-demographic and the biomedical characteristics of the study participants. Of the 935 mothers who completed the baseline interview, 860 women (92%) initiated breastfeeding.
Table 1

Sociodemographic and biomedical characteristics of the participants (n = 935)

Characteristic

Number

Percent

Sociodemographic factors

 Maternal age (years)

   < 25

93

9.9

  25–29

255

27.3

  30–34

351

37.5

   ≥ 35

236

25.2

 Maternal education

   < Year 12

141

15.1

  Year 12 completed

208

22.2

  College/TAFE

179

19.1

  University

407

43.5

 Marital status

  Married

734

78.5

  Living with a partner/ De facto

110

11.8

  Single Mother

91

9.7

 Mother’s occupation

  Home duties/ student

170

18.2

  Managers

61

6.5

  Professionals

241

25.8

  Sales/Clerical

294

31.4

  Unskilled

169

18.1

 Mother’s country of birth

  Australia

436

46.6

  China

57

6.1

  Vietnam

132

14.1

  Asia other

111

11.9

  Middle East/Africa

81

8.7

  Others

117

12.5

 Partner’s country of birth

  Australia

359

38.4

  China

42

4.5

  Vietnam

115

12.3

  Asia Other

105

11.2

  Middle East/Africa

96

10.3

  Others

120

12.8

 Index for relative socioeconomic disadvantage

  Least Disadvantaged

50

5.3

  2nd Quintile

238

25.5

  3rd Quintile

80

8.6

  4th Quintile

183

19.6

  Most Disadvantaged

384

41.1

Biomedical factors

  

 Parity

  Primiparous

468

50.1

  Multiparous

467

49.9

 Infant gender

  Female

458

49.0

  Male

477

51.0

 Infant birth weight

  Average or greater

889

95.1

  Low

46

4.9

 Smoking status of the mother post partum

  No

852

91.1

  Yes

83

8.9

 Smoking status of the mother during pregnancy

  No

884

94.5

  Yes

51

5.5

 Alcohol drinking status of the mother post partum

  No

633

67.7

  Yes

302

32.3

 Alcohol drinking status of the mother during pregnancy

  No

843

90.2

  Yes

92

9.8

 Method of delivery

  Vaginal

653

69.8

  Caesarean

282

30.2

Univariate analysis

Table 2 lists the socio-demographic, biomedical, and psychosocial factors known or suspected to be associated with breastfeeding initiation. Higher levels of maternal education and maternal occupational status were associated with increased odds for breastfeeding initiation, whilst being a single mother was associated with decreased odds of not initiating breastfeeding. Furthermore, women from some Asian countries (eg: Indian sub-continent) had higher odds of breastfeeding initiation compared to Australian born women. Mothers who had more than one child, or who smoked cigarettes during pregnancy, or drank alcohol during pregnancy, or who had a caesarean delivery were less likely to initiate breastfeeding. Women who had chosen their preferred feeding method before pregnancy were more likely to breastfeed than women who had made their decision either during pregnancy or after labour. There was also a strong association between the initiation of breastfeeding and if the partner preferred breastfeeding.
Table 2

Association between socio-demographic, biomedical, and psychosocial factors and breastfeeding initiation (n = 935)

Variable

Breastfeeding Initiationa

Univariate odds ratiob

Yes

No

  

N (%)

N (%)

OR

95%CI

Sociodemographic factors

 Maternal age (years)

   < 25

84 (90.3)

9 (9.7)

1.00

 

  25–29

235 (92.2)

20 (7.8)

1.26

0.55, 2.87

  30–34

323 (92.0)

28 (8.0)

1.24

0.56, 2.72

   ≥ 35

218 (92.4)

18 (7.6)

1.30

0.56, 3.00

 Maternal education

   < Year 12

114 (80.9)

27 (19.1)

1.00

 

  Year 12 completed

182 (87.5)

26 (12.5)

1.66

0.92, 2.98

  College/TAFE

169 (94.4)

10 (5.6)

4.00

1.86, 8.59**

  University

395 (97.1)

12 (2.9)

7.80

3.83, 15.88**

 Marital status

  Married

689 (93.9)

45 (6.1)

1.00

 

  Living with a partner/ De facto

98 (89.1)

12 (10.9)

0.53

0.27, 1.04

  Single mother

73 (80.2)

18 (19.8)

0.26

0.15, 0.48**

 Mother’s occupation

  Home duties/ student

148 (87.1)

22 (12.9)

1.00

 

  Unskilled

152 (89.9)

17 (10.1)

1.33

0.68, 2.60

  Sales/Clerical

268 (91.2)

26 (8.8)

1.53

0.84, 2.80

  Managers

58 (95.1)

3 (4.9)

2.87

0.83, 9.97

  Professionals

234 (97.1)

7 (2.9)

4.97

2.07, 11.92**

 Mother’s country of birth

  Australia

398 (91.3)

38 (8.7)

1.00

 

  China

55 (96.5)

2 (3.5)

2.63

0.62, 11.19

  Vietnam

117 (88.6)

15 (11.4)

0.74

0.40, 1.40

  Asia other

109 (98.2)

2 (1.8)

5.20

1.24, 21.91*

  Middle East/Africa

77 (95.1)

4 (4.9)

1.84

0.64, 5.30

  Others

103 (88.0)

14 (12.0)

0.70

0.37, 1.34

 Partner’s country of birth

  Australia

327 (91.1)

32 (8.9)

1.00

 

  China

41 (97.6)

1 (2.4)

4.01

0.53, 30.14

  Vietnam

103 (89.6)

12 (10.4)

0.84

0.42, 1.69

  Asia other

101 (96.2)

4 (3.8)

2.47

0.85, 7.15

  Middle East/Africa

93 (96.9)

3 (3.1)

3.03

0.91, 10.13

  Others

110 (91.7)

10 (8.3)

1.08

0.51, 2.26

 Mother intended to be employed/study at 6 months post-partum

  No/Undecided

672 (91.4)

63 (8.6)

1.00

 

  Yes

188 (94.0)

12 (6.0)

1.47

0.78, 2.78

 Index for relative socioeconomic disadvantage

  Least disadvantaged

48 (96.0)

2 (4.0)

1.00

 

  2nd quintile

223 (93.7)

15 (6.3)

0.62

0.14, 2.80

  3rd quintile

77 (96.3)

3 (3.8)

1.07

0.17, 6.63

  4th quintile

162 (88.5)

21 (11.5)

0.32

0.07, 1.42

  Most disadvantaged

350 (91.1)

34 (8.9)

0.43

0.10, 1.84

Biomedical factors

 Parity

  Primiparous

444 (94.9)

24 (5.1)

1.00

 

  Multiparous

416 (89.1)

51 (10.9)

0.44

0.27, 0.73*

 Infant gender

  Female

421 (91.9)

37 (8.1)

1.00

 

  Male

439 (92.0)

38 (8.0)

1.02

0.63, 1.63

 Infant birth weight

  Average or greater (≥ 2500 g)

819 (92.1)

70 (7.9)

1.00

 

  Low (<2500 g)

41 (89.1)

5 (10.9)

0.70

0.27, 1.83

 Method of delivery

  Vaginal

618 (94.6)

35 (5.4)

1.00

 

  Caesarean

242 (85.8)

40 (14.2)

0.34

0.21, 0.55**

 Smoking status of the mother during pregnancy

  No

821 (92.9)

63 (7.1)

1.00

 

  Yes

39 (76.5)

12 (23.5)

0.25

0.12, 0.50**

 Alcohol drinking status of the mother during pregnancy

  No

785 (93.1)

58 (6.9)

1.00

 

  Yes

75 (81.5)

17 (18.5)

0.33

0.18, 0.59**

Psychosocial factors

 Partner prefers breastfeeding

  No or ambivalent

204 (82.3)

44 (17.7)

1.00

 

  Yes

562 (97.7)

13 (2.3)

9.32

4.92, 17.67**

 Infant feeding decision made before pregnancy

  No

128 (87.1)

19 (12.9)

1.00

 

  Yes

732 (92.9)

56 (7.1)

1.94

1.12, 3.37*

OR Odds ratio, 95%CI 95% confidence interval

a The total of the categories do not always add up to 935 due to missing or incomplete data for some items

b The univariate odds ratio indicates the likelihood of being breastfed ever

* p < 0.05 ** p < 0.001

Multivariate analysis

Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine which variables could best explain the chosen method of feeding. Those factors that were independently associated with initiation of breastfeeding are presented in Table 3. After potential confounding factors were controlled for, level of maternal education was significantly associated with breastfeeding initiation. Women who completed a university degree were more likely to initiate breastfeeding compared to those who did not complete high school (AOR = 7.16, 95% CI 2.73, 18.79). Vietnamese women had lower odds of breastfeeding initiation compared to Australian born women (AOR = 0.34. 95% CI 0.13, 0.87). Women who had more than one child were less likely to breastfeed than those who had one child (AOR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.19, 0.79). Women who gave birth via a caesarean section were less likely to breastfeed their baby compared to those who had a vaginal delivery (AOR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.14, 0.52). Women who drank alcohol during pregnancy had 72% lower odds to breastfeed compared to those who did not (AOR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.11, 0.71). Women who reported that their partner preferred breastfeeding were more likely to initiate breastfeeding (AOR = 11.77, 95% CI 5.73, 24.15) and women who had chosen to breastfeed before pregnancy had more than 2.5 times the odds of breastfeeding their baby compared to those women who made their decision either during pregnancy or after labour (AOR = 2.80, 95% CI 1.31, 5.97).
Table 3

Factors independentlya associated with initiation of breastfeeding after adjustment for potential confoundersb (n = 822)

Variable

 

Ever initiated breastfeeding

 

AdjORc

95%CI

p-value

Sociodemographic factors

 Maternal education

   < Year 12

1.00

  

  Year 12 completed

1.36

0.56, 3.31

0.498

  College/TAFE

2.28

0.84, 6.16

0.105

  University

7.16

2.73, 18.79

<0.001

 Mother’s country of birth

  Australia

1.00

  

  China

0.75

0.15, 3.74

0.729

  Vietnam

0.34

0.13, 0.87

0.025

  Asia other

1.93

0.41, 9.09

0.406

  Middle East/Africa

1.86

0.51, 6.81

0.348

  Others

0.41

0.17, 1.00

0.050

Biomedical factors

 Parity

  Primiparous

1.00

  

  Multiparous

0.38

0.19, 0.79

0.010

 Method of delivery

  Vaginal

1.00

  

  Caesarean

0.27

0.14, 0.52

<0.001

 Alcohol drinking status of the mother during pregnancy

  No

1.00

  

  Yes

0.28

0.11, 0.71

0.008

Psychosocial factors

 Partner prefers breastfeeding

  No or ambivalent

1.00

  

  Yes

11.77

5.73, 24.15

<0.001

 Infant feeding decision made before pregnancy

  No

1.00

  

  Yes

2.80

1.31, 5.97

0.008

a All variables in the final model were variables for which, when excluded, the change in deviance compared with the corresponding χ2 test statistic

on the relevant degrees of freedom was significant

b Adjusted for maternal age, marital status, maternal occupation, father’s country of birth, mother’s future employment intentions,

index of relative socioeconomic disadvantage, infant gender, infant birth weight, smoking status of the mother during pregnancy

c AdjOR Adjusted Odds Ratio, 95%CI 95% confidence interval

Discussion

This study provides an insight into the socio-demographic, biomedical and psychosocial factors associated with breastfeeding initiation practices of mothers residing in South Western Sydney. The independent predictors included factors such as maternal education, maternal alcohol consumption during pregnancy, giving birth via a caesarean section, partner support for breastfeeding, and timing of infant feeding decision. In the present study, nine out of 10 of women commenced breastfeeding indicating strong adherence to WHO infant feeding guidelines [1]. This is in accordance with previous local and national reports [13, 22, 24, 25].

Maternal socio-demographic factors such as age and education that might influence early childhood feeding are non-modifiable and as such are not subject to direct clinical intervention. Still, they can predict which mothers may be less likely to initiate and continue breastfeeding, thus identifying sub-groups that would benefit the most from health promotion strategies. Maternal age has consistently been associated with breastfeeding initiation [26, 27]; in general, older mothers are more likely to initiate breastfeeding and to continue breastfeeding for longer [28]. Conversely in this study, after controlling for covariates and potentially confounding variables, maternal age was not found to be associated with breastfeeding initiation. Similar findings have also been observed in earlier Australian research which adjusted for similar counfounders [21, 29]. This finding, is not unexpected in this study given that the cohort was relatively mature with only 10% of subjects being aged less than 25 years and because the initiation of breastfeeding was near universal [29]. The present study endorses the existing evidence that level of maternal education amongst Western women could independently predict breastfeeding initiation. Similar results have been reported by recent Australian studies [26, 27, 30] and a recent cohort study in the United States [31]. In this study, women born in Vietnam were less likely to initiate breastfeeding compared to Australian born mothers (Table 3). Other researchers have also reported findings that Vietnamese migrant women are less likely to breastfeed than Australian born women [25, 32] and the proportion of Vietnamese mothers in this study initiating breastfeeding was 10% lower than that reported for Vietnamese women in their home country [33]. Reasons previously cited for low breastfeeding rates among Vietnamese migrant women are cultural beliefs related to colostrum [25], inconvenience [32], perceptions of impaired quality of milk [34], economic reasons such as the need to return to work [31, 34], a decrease in social support [32, 35], perception that more affluent families do not breastfeed their own babies [35], and a desire to conform to the perceived cultural norm of the new country [34]. In this study, reasons for breastfeeding initiation were not explored in-depth and therefore it is difficult to draw conclusions for the lower rates of initiation.

Similar to prior studies [31, 36] a positive association was found between parity and breastfeeding initiation among the target population. In this study, multiparous women were less likely to initiate breastfeeding compared to their primparous counterparts. We speculate that multiparous women who previously experienced breastfeeding difficulties did not initiate breastfeeding. A recent study from the United States [37] reported a notable decrease in breastfeeding initiation with increasing birth order: compared to the first birth, the odds for non-initiation after a second delivery almost doubled (OR = 1.83, 95%CI1.42, 2.35) and the odds for non-initiation after a third delivery were further increased (OR = 2.44, 95%CI 1.56, 3.82). The public health implication of this observation in our study is that breastfeeding rates among multiparous women might be improved through targeted pre- and post-natal support of women with a history of unsuccessful breastfeeding.

Also, consistent with the literature [38], women who consumed alcohol during pregnancy were less likely to initiate breastfeeding. It is not clear if there is a biological mechanism for this association or whether mothers who drank chose not to breastfeed out of concern for the safety of their child or whether this association reflects a clustering of unhealthy lifestyle practices [38]. Nevertheless, we recommend that primary care providers advise pregnant women about the harmful effects of alcohol on breastfeeding success and refer women to where they can find information alcohol consumption and breastfeeding [39]. Interestingly, there was no association with mothers’ smoking status during pregnancy and breastfeeding initiation in the current study; which is in contrast to the findings of an earlier study in South Western Sydney [40]. While a review of epidemiological studies on the association between maternal smoking and breastfeeding found that in general, women who smoke are less likely to intend to breastfeed and to initiate breastfeeding, this association has not been consistently reported in Australian studies [29]. It has been suggested that the reason for this association is more likely to be psychosocial rather than biological [41]. The above findings can assist to identify disadvantaged target populations to effectively implement public health interventions for promoting breastfeeding initiation.

Caesarean section is a significant barrier to the initiation of breastfeeding. Similar to other international research [42, 43], a negative association was observed between caesarean section and breastfeeding initiation in the current study. Delayed skin-to-skin contact [44], prolonged mother-infant separation, an increased length of stay in hospital, as well as maternal endocrinological changes induced by surgery have all been postulated as reasons for failure to initiate breastfeeding in mothers who undergo a caesarean section [43]. Since caesarean section is an increasingly common method of delivery [45], it is important that these women are provided additional breastfeeding support post-delivery.

Although in this study, marital status was not found to be associated with breastfeeding initiation, the father’s preference for breastfeeding was reported to be a strong positive factor associated with the initiation of breastfeeding. The results of this study support and strengthen the findings of previous studies [22, 29]. The degree to which a woman’s partner will influence her decision to breastfeed will vary according to woman’s age, social class and cultural background [46]. For instance, Anglo-American women identified their husband as being their major source of support regarding infant feeding decision [12]. Studies of women from Indian sub-continent highlighted the importance of mothers and grandmothers on infant feeding decisions and providing practical support in breastfeeding [47, 48]. In this study, fathers were not interviewed, and answers to paternal preferences represent mother’s opinion about the husband’s attitude. Nevertheless, the results of this research indicate the need to include fathers in breastfeeding related decisions and to participate in antenatal programs where breastfeeding is discussed. Providing fathers from ethnically diverse backgrounds with culturally appropriate breastfeeding information to become breastfeeding advocates will likely increase breastfeeding practices in Sydney, Australia.

Another psychosocial factor found to be a predictor of breastfeeding initiation was the timing when the infant feeding decision was made. In this study, the majority of the women had made their infant feeding decision before they conceived. There was an association between when the decision was made with the initiation of breastfeeding. Women who chose their feeding method before becoming pregnant were more likely to breastfeed than women who made their decision after becoming pregnant (Table 3). This positive correlation is supported by previous research [29]. The time at which a woman makes her feeding decision may be viewed as a marker of maternal commitment. Women who decide to breastfeed prior to becoming pregnancy are likely to have a stronger desire and determination to breastfeed than women who do not consider infant feeding until later in their pregnancy.

This study has a number of limitations. First, the outcome was measured based on self-report which may have led to a recall bias that may have underestimated or overestimated the association between breastfeeding initiation and key study factors. However, it is worth noting that the recall period for this study was short. Second, in for some explanatory variables (e.g. country of birth and IRSAD), the number of women in some categories was small (<5). Given the small proportion of women who did not initiate breastfeeding this resulted in a rare events bias reflected in the large confidence intervals around the odds ratio [49]. A larger sample of women from countries such as China, Middle East/Africa and other parts of Asia would have provided more statistically robust findings and these findings should be interpreted with care. Third, this study only reports on breastfeeding initiation in South Western Sydney; therefore the findings may not be generalisable to all of New South Wales or Australia. Nevertheless, this study is one of the few studies that report on breastfeeding initiation in South Western Sydney, one of the most ethnically diverse area in Australia with high levels of social disadvantage. Hence, the results may be used to inform both local and national nutrition programs as the findings provide useful insights into those population groups at risk of not initiating breastfeeding, as well as potentially modifiable risk factors for this practice.

Conclusions

This study provides further insight into breastfeeding initiation practice in one of Australia’s most ethnically diverse areas with high levels of social disadvantage. While breastfeeding initiation rates in South Western Sydney are high, there are some population groups nevertheless which are less likely to initiate breastfeeding than Australian mothers. Those women with lower levels of education, who consume alcohol during pregnancy, have more than one child, make their infant feeding decision after becoming pregnant, and those of Vietnamese ethnicity should be targeted when implementing breastfeeding promotion programs. Furthermore, women who deliver by caesarean section require additional breastfeeding support post-delivery and it is important to include fathers in breastfeeding related decisions and encourage them to participate in antenatal programs.

Abbreviations

X 2

Chi-square95%CI

95% confidence interval

AOR: 

Adjusted Odds Ratio

BFHI: 

Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative

CFHN: 

Child and Family Health Nurses

NSW: 

New South Wales

UNICEF: 

United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff from Sydney and South Western Sydney Local Health Districts for their continued support with the project. The authors are grateful to the Child and Family Health Nurses who recruited families to this birth cohort study. We would like to thank the families who are a part of the Healthy Smiles Healthy Kids study for their continued commitment to this ongoing cohort study.

Availability of data and material

The data of this study can’t be shared publically due to the presence of sensitive (confidential) participants’ information.

Authors’ contribution

AA, JAS, JE, SL and SB conceived the study. NM assisted in study co-ordination. AA performed the analysis and interpreted the results with assistance from AH and JAS. AA and NM prepared the first draft. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Funding

This project is supported by NHMRC Grants (1069861, 1033213, 1134075), NSW Health, Australian Dental Research Foundation, Western Sydney University, and Oral Health Foundation.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approvals for this study were obtained from the former Sydney South West Area Health Service – RPAH Zone (ID number X08–0115), Liverpool Hospital, University of Sydney, and Western Sydney University. All participants signed a written consent form to be a part of this study.

Consent for publication

All research participants consented to use their data de-identified data for publishing in scientific publications.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University
(2)
Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Sydney Medical School
(3)
Oral Health Service, Sydney Local Health District and Sydney Dental Hospital, NSW Health
(4)
COHORTE Research Group, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research
(5)
Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney
(6)
Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Sydney
(7)
Community Paediatrics, Sydney Local Health District, NSW Health
(8)
Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, University of Iowa
(9)
School of Public Health, Curtin University

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2003.Google Scholar
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian Dietary Guidelines. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2013.Google Scholar
  3. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, França GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387:475–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hörnell A, Lagström H, Lande B, Thorsdottir I. Breastfeeding, introduction of other foods and effects on health: a systematic literature review for the 5th Nordic Nutrition Recommendations. London: Co-Action Publishing; 2013.Google Scholar
  5. Fall C, Robinson S. Infant nutrition and later health: a review of current evidence. Forum Nutr. 2012;4:859–74.Google Scholar
  6. Kramer MS, Kakuma R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;8:CD003517.Google Scholar
  7. Hale R. Infant nutrition and the benefits of breastfeeding. Br J Midwifery. 2007;15:368–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennis CL. Breastfeeding initiation and duration: a 1990-2000 literature review. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002;31:12–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Celi AC, Rich-Edwards JW, Richardson MK, Kleinman KP, Gillman MW. Immigration, race/ethnicity, and social and economic factors as predictors of breastfeeding initiation. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:255–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Leahy-Warren P, Mulcahy H, Phelan A, Corcoran P. Factors influencing initiation and duration of breast feeding in Ireland. Midwifery. 2014;30:345–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Merewood A, Patel B, Newton KN, MacAuley LP, Chamberlain LB, Francisco P, et al. Breastfeeding duration rates and factors affecting continued breastfeeding among infants born at an inner-city US Baby-Friendly hospital. J Hum Lact. 2007;23:157–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Baranowski T, Bee DE, Rassin DK, Richardson CJ, Brown JP, Guenther N, et al. Social support, social influence, ethnicity and the breastfeeding decision. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17:1599–611.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2010 Australian National Infant Feeding Survey: INDICATOR results. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2011.Google Scholar
  14. Scott JA, Landers MC, Hughes RM, Binns CW. Factors associated with breastfeeding at discharge and duration of breastfeeding. J Paediatr Child Health. 2001;37:254–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Amir LH, Donath SM. Socioeconomic status and rates of breastfeeding in Australia: evidence from three recent national health surveys. Med J Aust. 2008;189:254–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Socio-economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA): 2006. Canberra; 2008. http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/72283F45CB86E5FECA2574170011B271/$File/2039055001_socio-economic%20indexes%20for%20areas%20(seifa)%20-%20technical%20paper_2006.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2017.
  17. Hector D, Webb K, Lymer S. Describing breastfeeding practices in New South Wales using data from the NSW Child Health Survey, 2001. NSW Public Health Bull. 2005;16:47–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Arora A, Scott J, Bhole S, Do L, Schwarz E, Blinkhorn A. Early childhood feeding practices and dental caries in preschool children: a multi-centre birth cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldfeld S, Wright M, Oberklaid F. Parents, infants and health care: utilization of health services in the first 12 months of life. J Paediatr Child Health. 2003;39:249–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Arora A, Bedros D, Bhole S, Do LG, Scott J, Blinkhorn A, et al. Child and family health nurses' experiences of oral health of preschool children: a qualitative approach. J Public Health Dent. 2012;72:149–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Scott JA, Binns CW, Aroni RA. Breast-feeding in Perth: recent trends. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1996;20:210–1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Scott JA, Binns CW, Oddy WH, Graham KI. Predictors of breastfeeding duration: evidence from a cohort study. Pediatrics. 2006;117:e646–e55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Austrlian Bureau of Statistics. Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) SA1. Canberra; 2015. https://data.gov.au/dataset/census-of-population-and-housing-socio-economic-indexes-for-areas-seifa-sa1. Accessed 22 July 2017
  24. Gray M, Smart D. Growing up in Australia: the longitudinal study of Australian children is now walking and talking. Family Matters. 2008;79:5–13.Google Scholar
  25. McLachlan HL, Forster DA. Initial breastfeeding attitudes and practices of women born in Turkey, Vietnam and Australia after giving birth in Australia. Int Breastfeed J. 2006;1:7.Google Scholar
  26. Forde KA, Miller LJ. 2006-07 north metropolitan Perth breastfeeding cohort study: how long are mothers breastfeeding? Breastfeed Rev. 2010;18:14–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor LK, Lim K, Neville SE. Newborn feeding practices at the time of discharge from hospital in NSW in 2007: a descriptive study. N S W Public Health Bull. 2010;20:177–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Tarrant M, Fong DY, Wu KM, Lee IL, Wong EM, Sham A, et al. Breastfeeding and weaning practices among Hong Kong mothers: a prospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Scott JA, Binns CW, Graham KI, Oddy WH. Temporal changes in the determinants of breastfeeding initiation. Birth. 2006;33:37–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Holowko N, Jones M, Koupil I, Tooth L, Mishra G. High education and increased parity are associated with breastfeeding initiation and duration among Australian women. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19:2551–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Dagher RK, McGovern PM, Schold JD, Randall XJ. Determinants of breastfeeding initiation and cessation among employed mothers: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:194.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Rossiter JC, Yam BMC. Breastfeeding: How could it be enhanced? The perceptions of Vietnamese women in Sydney, Australia. J Midwifery Women's Health. 2000;45:271–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Duong DV, Binns CW, Lee AH. Breastfeeding initiation and exclusive breastfeeding in rural Vietnam. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7:795–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rossiter JC. Maternal-infant health beliefs and the perception and experience of immigrant Vietnamese women in Sydney. Contemp Nurse. 1992;1:75–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rossiter JC. Attitudes of Vietnamese women to baby feeding practices before and after immigration to Sydney, Australia. Midwifery. 1992;8:103–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hauck YL, Fenwick J, Dhaliwal SS, Butt J. A Western Australian survey of breastfeeding initiation, prevalence and early cessation patterns. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15:260–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sutherland T, Pierce CB, Blomquist JL, Handa VL. Breastfeeding practices among first time mothers and across multiple pregnancies. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16:1665–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Giglia R, Binns C. Alcohol and lactation: a systematic review. Nutr Diet. 2006;63:103–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. White B, White J, Giglia R, Tawia S. (2016) Feed Safe: a multidisciplinary partnership approach results in a successful mobile application for breastfeeding mothers. Health Promot J Austr. 2016;27:111–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Yeoh BH, Eastwood J, Phung H, Woolfenden S. Factors influencing breastfeeding rates in south-western Sydney. J Paediatr Child Health. 2007;43:249–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Donath SM, Amir LH, the ALSPAC Study Team. The relatonship between maternal smoking and breastfeeding duration after adjustment for maternal infant feeding intention. Acta Paediatr. 2004;93:1514–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Dashti M, Scott JA, Edwards CA, Al-Sughayer M. Determinants of breastfeeding initiation among mothers in Kuwait. Int Breastfeed J. 2010;5:7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Leung GM, Lam T-H, Ho L-M. Breastfeeding and its relation to smoking and mode of delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:785–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Stevens J, Schmied V, Burns E, Dahlen H. Immediate or early skin-to-skin contact after a Caesarean section: a review of the literature. Matern Child Nutr. 2014;10:456–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s health 2014. Canberra: AIHW; 2014.Google Scholar
  46. Matich JR, Sims LS. A comparison of social support variables between women who intend to breast or bottle feed. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34:919–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Reissland N, Burghart R. The role of massage in south Asia: child health and development. Soc Sci Med. 1987;25:231–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Khadduri R, Marsh D, Rasmussen B, Bari A, Nazir R, Darmstadt G. Household knowledge and practices of newborn and maternal health in Haripur district, Pakistan. J Perinatol. 2008;28:182–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Firth D. Bias reduction of maximum-likelihood-estimates. Biometrika. 1993;80:27–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement