Skip to content

Advertisement

International Breastfeeding Journal

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access

Exclusive breastfeeding practices among mothers in urban slum settlements: pooled analysis from three prospective birth cohort studies in South India

  • Vasanthakumar Velusamy1,
  • Prasanna S. Premkumar1Email author and
  • Gagandeep Kang1
International Breastfeeding Journal201712:35

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-017-0127-8

Received: 4 January 2017

Accepted: 19 July 2017

Published: 1 August 2017

Abstract

Background

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends six months of exclusive breastfeeding. Despite documented health, social and economic benefits, the practice of exclusive breastfeeding is quite low and information on influencing factors is limited especially from slum settlements. Our goal is to assess the prevalence and evaluate factors associated with early cessation of exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months of life among mothers in urban slums of Vellore, Southern India.

Methods

We pooled data from three similar birth cohort studies (n = 1088) conducted between 2002 and 2009. Breastfeeding information was obtained soon after birth and then from follow-up home visits conducted once every two weeks by the field workers. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to assess factors associated with early cessation of exclusive breastfeeding.

Results

The prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months was 11.4%, based on prospective data since birth. Results from multivariable analyses revealed maternal education (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [AHR] 1.18 , 95% CI 1.03, 1.35), pucca type of house (AHR 1.25 , 95% CI 1.10, 1.43), two or more number of children in the family (AHR 1.26 , 95% CI 1.10, 1.43), joint family structure (AHR 1.20 , 95% CI 1.02, 1.40) and birth during summer (AHR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01, 1.31) were associated with early cessation of exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that exclusive breastfeeding rates are well below the recommended levels. Educational interventions providing comprehensive breastfeeding information to mothers and their families can be evaluated to assess its effect on improving infant feeding practices.

Keywords

Prospective studyExclusive breastfeedingSociodemographic factorsUrban slumsIndia

Background

The importance of exclusive breastfeeding is well recognized; children who are exclusively breastfed for six months have a lower risk for gastrointestinal infections, respiratory illness, poor linear growth and cognitive impairment [1]. Moreover, it is described as one of the best cost effective interventions and the recommended infant feeding method for the first six months. Exclusive breastfeeding can prevent 823,000 annual deaths or 13.8% of all deaths of infants younger than 24 months, and the aim is that the breastfeeding coverage be scaled up to universal levels (90%) [1, 2]. Despite its demonstrated benefits, the practice of exclusive breastfeeding is not common in many developing countries including India [3]. Data from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-III, 2005–2006) show that less than 49% of Indian mothers exclusively breastfeed their infant for the period of six months [4]. Few studies conducted in slum settlements show exclusive breastfeeding rate is further lower in these settings, ranging between 15 and 30% [5, 6].

Past studies have identified socio-economic status, maternal education, family structure, gravida, utilization of antenatal care services, place of residence and access to information as correlates of exclusive breastfeeding [7]. However, the results have been conflicting in terms of the direction and magnitude, suggesting that social context and environmental factors could play an important role. These past studies were small, cross-sectional, and do not typically report the breastfeeding practices in specific settings such as urban slums. Rapid urban economic and population growth has outpaced the ability to provide adequate infrastructure, leading to a majority of urban residents to live in poor settings. These settings are characterized by inadequate water and sanitation and a limited education, health and other social services, thereby increasing the risk for a range of diseases. Given that slums are expanding at a fast rate and will present unique public health challenges [8], identifying factors that influence exclusive breastfeeding will be important to design tailored interventions that has a greater chance of success. Using data from prospective birth cohort studies, we aim to assess the prevalence and evaluate factors associated with early cessation of exclusive breastfeeding among mothers in urban slums of Vellore, Southern India.

Methods

Vellore is a Southern Indian city with a population of approximately 185,803 (census report, 2011) [9]. We combined data for this analysis from three community based prospective birth cohort studies conducted in urban slums of Vellore. These studies were conducted to understand the epidemiology and natural history of childhood enteric infections, including transmission patterns and the role of nutrition, growth and morbidity. The studies were launched in 2002, 2008 and 2009, with a maximum follow-up duration of three years. All three studies followed similar protocols for recruitment and data collection. Pregnant women who intend to stay in the study area for the follow-up period were recruited and followed up until delivery. Children were enrolled soon after birth, and fieldworkers visited each household to obtain baseline information on demography, socio-economic indicators, and birth details. Breastfeeding at birth was assessed during this first interview after birth. They were then followed up through home visits by the fieldworkers every two weeks from birth. At each follow up interview, mothers were asked if the child consumed only breast milk or breast milk together with other food or liquids (aside medications) since the previous interview. Once a mother reported the consumption of other foods, data collection with regard to exclusive breastfeeding was terminated. Further details on the study population and methodology of individual studies were described in detail elsewhere [1012]. All studies were approved by appropriate institutional ethics committees. Informed consent was obtained at recruitment from mothers in the original birth cohort studies.

Data and definitions

We defined exclusive breastfeeding according to the WHO recommendation [13]. The infant had received only breastmilk and had not been fed any other food or fluid with the exception of oral rehydration solution, drops and syrups (vitamins, minerals and medicines) during the period of 0–6 months. We determined exclusive breastfeeding status since birth using prospective assessment of breastfeeding status obtained during the follow-up visits. The independent variables of interest include maternal age (≤ 20, > 20), maternal education (yes, no), gravid (primi, multi), months of birth (wet; September–March, dry; April–August), place of birth (home, hospital), history of abortion (yes, no), mode of delivery (caesarian, vaginal), birthweight of the infant (low, normal), gender of the child (male, female), number of children (< 2, ≥ 2), number of family members (≤ 5, > 5), socio-economic status (low, middle, high), type of family (nuclear, joint, extended) and house (kutcha, mixed and pucca). The type of house was determined by considering the quality of materials used for construction of its walls and roof and divided into three categories: pucca - brick walls and concrete roof; kutcha - mud walls and thatched roof; mixed - mud walls with brick walls or thatched roof.

Data analysis

We used Kaplan-Meier survival approach to estimate median duration of exclusive breastfeeding and rates of exclusive breastfeeding over the first six months. For this approach, cessation of exclusive breastfeeding was considered as the event of interest. Mothers who continue to exclusively breastfeed after the first six months and those lost to follow-up were considered as censored observations. Log-rank test was used to compare duration of exclusive breastfeeding for risk factors. Factors that were associated with exclusive breastfeeding with p < 0.1 were included in the multivariable Cox proportional regression model. The proportionality assumption was assessed using Schoenfeld residuals. Adjusted and unadjusted hazard ratios were reported with 95% confidence intervals and p - values.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics

Figure 1 shows the flow chart of the cohort. Of the initial 1125 pregnant women enrolled, 1088 (96.7%), 1080 (96%), 1046 (93%) and 1006 (89.4%) were followed up at birth, one month, three month and six month, respectively. Table 1 provides socio-demographic characteristics of the study sample. The mean age of the mothers was 23.9 (SD = 3.8) with 19% in the age group less than or equal to 20 years. One-third of mothers did not have any formal education (32.2%), and first-time mothers (33%), and 64.3% were from low socio-economic status. About 81% lived in nuclear/extended families, 84.6% had normal delivery and 97.8% delivered in health institutions.
Fig. 1

Flow chart of participants

Table 1

Sociodemographic characteristics

Characteristics

n = 1088 (%)

Mean age of the mothers (SD)

23.9 (3.8)

SES

 Low

699 (64.3)

 Moderate/High

389 (35.7)

Family type

 Nuclear/Extended

882 (81)

 Joint

206 (19)

Mothers education

 No formal education

350 (32.2)

 Education

738 (67.8)

Parity

 Primi

359 (33)

 Multi

729 (67)

Mode of delivery

 Cesarean/Instrument

167 (15.4)

 Vaginal

921 (84.6)

Place of birth

 Home

24 (2.2)

 Hospital

1064 (97.8)

Breastfeeding indicators

Figure 2 shows the Kaplan-Meier curve for duration of exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months after birth. The median duration of exclusive breastfeeding was 15.9 weeks (approximately four months). Of the 1088 mothers, 98.4% of the mothers exclusively breastfed at birth, this declined to 91.7% and 63.7% in the first and third month respectively. By the sixth month, only 11.4% of the mothers exclusively breastfed their infants. Rates of any breastfeeding at birth, first, third and six months were 99.7%, 98.5%, 95.2% and 85.7% respectively.
Fig. 2

Duration of exclusive breastfeeding

Bivariate and multivariable analyses

Bivariate analysis indicated maternal education, house type, number of children, family structure and birth season were associated with cessation of exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months (Table 2). In the multivariable analysis (Table 3), the risk of cessation was higher among mothers with an education compared to mothers with no formal education (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [AHR] 1.18, 95% CI 1.03,1.35). The number of children in a family was a significant determinant: mothers with two or more children were more likely to cease exclusive breastfeeding compared to mothers with less than two children (AHR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10, 1.43). Living in a pucca house was associated with increased risk for cessation of exclusive breastfeeding than living in kutcha or mixed house type (AHR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10, 1.43). Mothers in nuclear/extended family, compared to mothers from joint family, are more likely to cease breastfeeding (AHR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02, 1.40). Mothers who gave birth during the summer months were more like to cease exclusive breastfeeding (AHR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01, 1.31).
Table 2

Bi-variate analysis of factors associated with cessation of exclusive breastfeeding

Characteristics

n = 973

n = 115

p-value

HR

95% CI

Non-EBF (%)

EBF (%)

Number of children

  > = 2 children

378 (92.4)

31 (7.6)

0.005*

1.20

1.06,1.37

  < 2 children

595 (87.6)

84 (12.4)

   

Number of persons

  < = 5 persons

577 (88.9)

72 (11.1)

0.50

1.05

0.92,1.19

  > 5 persons

396 (90.2)

43 (9.8)

   

SES

 High

361 (92.8)

28 (7.2)

<0.001*

1.30

1.14,1.48

 Low/Mod

612 (87.5)

87 (12.5)

   

Family type

 Joint

195 (94.7)

11 (5.3)

0.02*

1.21

1.04,1.42

 Nuclear/Extended

778 (88.2)

104 (11.8)

   

House type

 Pucca

579 (91.9)

51 (8.1)

0.001*

1.23

1.08,1.40

 Kutcha/Mixed

394 (86.0)

64 (14.0)

   

Mother’s age

  > 20 years

791 (90.0)

88 (10.0)

0.32

1.08

0.92,1.27

  < = 20 years

182 (87.1)

27 (12.9)

   

Mother’s Education

 Education

670 (90.8)

68 (9.2)

0.008*

1.20

1.05,1.38

 No formal education

303 (86.6)

47 (13.4)

   

Parity

 Multi

651 (89.3)

78 (10.7)

0.75

0.98

0.86,1.12

 Primi

322 (89.7)

37 (10.3)

   

Month of birthing

 Summer

380 (91.8)

34 (8.2)

0.02*

1.16

1.02,1.32

 Winter

593 (88.0)

81 (12.0)

   

Abortion (previous)

 No

852 (90.1)

94 (9.9)

0.83

0.98

0.81,1.19

 Yes

121 (85.2)

21 (14.8)

   

Place of delivery

 Hospital

954 (89.6)

110 (10.4)

0.29

1.28

0.81,2.01

 Home

19 (79.2)

5 (20.8)

   

Mode of delivery

 Vaginal

822 (89.2)

99 (10.8)

0.11

0.87

0.73,1.03

 Instrumental/Cesarean

151 (90.4)

16 (9.6)

   

Low Birth Weight

 No

816 (89.7)

94 (10.3)

0.61

1.05

0.87,1.26

 Yes

136 (89.5)

16 (10.4)

   

Child’s sex

 Male

508 (89.8)

58 (10.2)

0.91

0.99

0.88,1.13

 Female

465 (89.1)

57 (10.9)

   

*Significant at 5% level; HR Hazard Ratio

Table 3

Multivariable analysis of factors associated with cessation of exclusive breastfeeding, from Cox proportional hazard analysis

Determinants

Reference

AHR

95% CI

p-value

No of children: > = 2 children

< children

1.26

1.10,1.43

0.001

House type: Pucca

Kutcha/Mixed

1.25

1.10,1.43

0.001

Family type: Joint

Nuclear/Extended

1.20

1.02,1.40

0.03

Mother’s education: Education

No formal education

1.18

1.03,1.35

0.02

Month of birthing: Summer

Winter

1.16

1.01,1.31

0.03

AHR Adjusted Hazard Ratio

Discussion

In this study, only one-tenth of the mothers exclusively breastfed their infants for a period of six months from birth. Prospective studies from India are limited, but studies from neighbouring countries such as Sri Lanka 49.1% [14], Maldives 41% [15] and Nepal 29.7% [16] reported higher rates of exclusive breastfeeding from birth. These large differences might be due to the fact that mothers residing in slum settlements were not exposed to promotional messages and initiatives aimed at improving breastfeeding practices. With an overwhelming majority of infants not exclusively breastfed, it suggests an urgent need to find innovative strategies to reach mothers and key family members residing in these settings on benefits associated with exclusive breastfeeding.

In our analysis, we found educated mothers were more likely to discontinue exclusively breastfeeding than non-educated mothers. These findings were in contrast with evidence from developed countries [1], where the odds of complying with breastfeeding recommendations are higher among educated mothers compared with less educated mothers. While it is not clear why this is the case, this pattern supports findings from similar study in Nepal [16] and other developing country settings [17] where the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding was higher among illiterate mothers. It is likely that educated mothers are more exposed to breastmilk substitutes and might perceive them as a viable modern alternative [18]. Poor breastfeeding practices among educated mothers in this setting reflect a poor knowledge and lack of accessible educational opportunities on the best feeding practices. Moreover, if breastfeeding promotional activities are targeted at educated women, then they can play a key role in spreading the message across society.

Mothers from the pucca households were more likely to cease exclusively breastfeed than those from the mixed/kutcha households. Household type could reflect the long-term socio-economic status of a family and studies from low and middle income countries (LMIC) report a similar higher prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding in lower socio-economic groups [19, 20]. The number of children in the family is found to be negatively associated with the duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Similar results have been reported that mothers having more than one child, were more likely to cease to exclusively breastfeed their infants during the first six months [21]. As the presence of other children might contribute towards maternal fatigue, it is important to target this group in breastfeeding promotion and support programmes. The early cessation of exclusive breastfeeding among mothers in a joint family compared to those living in nuclear or extended family needs further investigation to understand the socio-cultural factors underlying the family structures and breastfeeding practices [22]. We found a significant relationship between the season of a birth and exclusive breastfeeding: infants born during summer were more likely to stop exclusive breastfeeding compared to those born during winter months. Our results are in agreement with studies from India [23] and Europe [24] where children born during summer were breastfed for a shorter period of time. However, results from African studies [25, 26] are in contrast to our findings. This could be explained by the strong presence of hunger (rainy months) and harvest (hot months) seasons in African settings. In South Asian tropical climates, summer is the pre-harvesting season and hence likely to be associated with a lack of adequate maternal nutrition. Therefore, our results could reflect mothers’ concern about their infants’ lack of adequate hydration during summer months prompting them to supplement with liquid or semi-solid foods.

The major strength of the study was the prospective design which helped the assessment of exclusive breastfeeding since birth more accurately than cross-sectional or retrospective studies. In cross-sectional or retrospective studies, estimates of exclusive breastfeeding rates are based on maternal recall which often tends to overestimate the duration of exclusive breastfeeding, leading to biased measures of association [16]. Further, pooling data from three similar birth cohort studies resulted in larger sample size of 1, 088, reducing the risk of chance findings and adding statistical power to the analyses of relevant determinants. With rigorous follow-up, information for most children is available and hence reduces the bias due to attrition.

The main limitation of this study is that it was not designed to assess the determinants of exclusive breastfeeding. A study designed to identify key factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding would likely include additional relevant factors that were not collected as a part of the existing studies. Also, missing information on antenatal visits, prelacteal feeding, time of initiation of breastfeeding, maternal nutrition, and vaccination schedule did not allow us to investigate these factors. Additionally, the studies did not collect information on formula feeding, animal milk feeding, support from family and health workers, and the reasons for discontinuing exclusive breastfeeding.

Conclusions

The practice of exclusive breastfeeding is considerably low among mothers living in urban slums settlements. Given the consequences of poor breastfeeding practices, there is a need to evaluate interventions educating the importance of breastfeeding to mothers and their families in reducing the gap between breastfeeding recommendations and practices.

Abbreviations

AHR: 

Adjusted Hazard Ratio

CI: 

Confidence interval

LMIC: 

Low and middle income countries

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the parents and children from the urban slums of Vellore for their enthusiastic participation and support. We also thank Drs. Rajiv Sarkar, Deepthi Kattula and field workers for their tireless monitoring of the cohorts and all the support staff of the Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, who made the studies possible.

Funding

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust Trilateral Initiative for Infectious Diseases, (grant no. 063144) and National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01 A1075452&R01 AI072222).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

VV analyzed data and drafted the manuscript, PSP reviewed data analysis and revised the manuscript and GK provided critical advice on analysis and findings. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Studies were approved by institutional ethics committee (Reference number: 4544, 6209 and 6501) and informed consent was obtained from each participant at recruitment in the original birth cohort studies.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College

References

  1. Victora CG, Bahl R, AJD B, GVA F, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. The Lancet. 2016;387:475–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter CK, Martines JC, et al. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices. The Lancet. 2016;387:491–504.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Patel A, Badhoniya N, Khadse S, Senarath U, Agho KE, Dibley MJ, et al. Infant and young child feeding indicators and determinants of poor feeding practices in India: secondary data analysis of National Family Health Survey 2005–06. Food Nutr Bull. 2010;31:314–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. International Institute for Population Sciences. India National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06. International Institute for Population Sciences. 2007.Google Scholar
  5. Noor S, Rajesh AH, Babu GK. A study on breast feeding practices among mothers of urban slums of Rourkela. IOSR-J Dent Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS). 2015;1:77–80.Google Scholar
  6. Roy S, Dasgupta A, Pal B. Feeding practices of children in an urban slum of Kolkata. Indian J Community Med. 2009;34:362.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Boccolini CS, Carvalho ML, Oliveira MI. Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months of life in Brazil: a systematic review. Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:91.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Madhiwalla N. Healthcare in urban slums in India. Natl Med J India. 2007;20:113–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Census of India. Available at http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/3304_PART_B_DCHB_VELLORE.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2016.
  10. Gladstone BP, Muliyil JP, Jaffar S, Wheeler JG, Le Fevre A, Iturriza-Gomara M, et al. Infant morbidity in an Indian slum birth cohort. Arch Dis Child. 2008;93:479–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sarkar R, Sivarathinaswamy P, Thangaraj B, Sindhu KN, Ajjampur SS, Muliyil J, et al. Burden of childhood diseases and malnutrition in a semi-urban slum in southern India. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:87.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Kattula D, Sarkar R, Sivarathinaswamy P, Velusamy V, Venugopal S, Naumova EN, et al. The first 1000 days of life: prenatal and postnatal risk factors for morbidity and growth in a birth cohort in southern India. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005404.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. World Health Organization. Infant and young child feeding: model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals. 2009.Google Scholar
  14. Agampodi SB, Agampodi TC, De Silva A. Exclusive breastfeeding in Sri Lanka: problems of interpretation of reported rates. Int Breastfeed J. 2009;4:14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Raheem RA, Binns CW, Chih HJ, Sauer K. Determinants of the introduction of prelacteal feeds in the Maldives. Breastfeed Med. 2014;9:473–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Karkee R, Lee AH, Khanal V, Binns CW. A community-based prospective cohort study of exclusive breastfeeding in central Nepal. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:927.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Abdel-Hady DM, El-Gilany A-H. Calculating, Exclusive breastfeeding rates: comparing dietary “24-hour recall” with recall “since birth” methods. Breastfeed Med. 2016;11:514–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Barennes H, Empis G, Quang TD, Sengkhamyong K, Phasavath P, Harimanana A, et al. Breast-milk substitutes: a new old-threat for breastfeeding policy in developing countries. A case study in a traditionally high breastfeeding country. PloS One. 2012;7:e30634.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Senarath U, Dibley MJ, Agho KE. Factors associated with nonexclusive breastfeeding in 5 east and southeast Asian countries: a multilevel analysis. J Hum Lact. 2010;26:248–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Khassawneh M, Khader Y, Amarin Z, Alkafajei A. Knowledge, attitude and practice of breastfeeding in the north of Jordan: a cross-sectional study. Int Breastfeed J. 2006;1:17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Holbrook KE, White MC, Heyman MB, Wojcicki JM. Maternal sociodemographic characteristics and the use of the Iowa Infant Attitude Feeding Scale to describe breastfeeding initiation and duration in a population of urban, Latina mothers: a prospective cohort study. Int Breastfeed J. 2013;8:7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Ulak M, Chandyo RK, Mellander L, Shrestha PS, Strand TA. Infant feeding practices in Bhaktapur, Nepal: a cross-sectional, health facility based survey. Int Breastfeed J. 2012;7:1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Das A, Chatterjee R, Karthick M, Mahapatra T, Chaudhuri I. The influence of seasonality and community-based health worker provided counselling on exclusive breastfeeding - findings from a cross-sectional survey in India. PloS One. 2016;11:e0161186.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Samuelsson U, Ludvigsson J. Seasonal variation of birth month and breastfeeding in children with diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2001;14:43–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sellen DW. Weaning, complementary feeding, and maternal decision making in a rural east African pastoral population. J Hum Lact. 2001;17:233–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Simondon KB, Simondon F. Mothers prolong breastfeeding of undernourished children in rural Senegal. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27:490–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement