Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

International Breastfeeding Journal

Open Access

Suboptimal breastfeeding practices are associated with infant illness in Vietnam

  • Nemat Hajeebhoy1,
  • Phuong H Nguyen2Email author,
  • Priya Mannava3,
  • Tuan T Nguyen1 and
  • Lan Tran Mai2
International Breastfeeding Journal20149:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-9-12

Received: 8 February 2014

Accepted: 24 July 2014

Published: 1 August 2014

Abstract

Background

Despite evidence supporting the importance of breastfeeding to child health, breastfeeding practices remain suboptimal in Vietnam. There is currently little evidence on the importance of breastfeeding in the prevention of morbidity during infancy in Vietnam. In order to provide country specific data for policy makers to support breastfeeding friendly policies and programs, analysis was undertaken on a cross-sectional dataset to investigate the association between breastfeeding practices and prevalence of diarrhea and acute respiratory infection (ARI) among infants aged 0–5 months.

Methods

Data on socio-demographic characteristics, infant feeding practices and prevalence of diarrhea and ARI were obtained from 6,068 mother-child dyads in 11 provinces of Vietnam in 2011. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the associations between breastfeeding practices and child illnesses.

Results

On average, the prevalence of diarrhea and ARI among infants 0–5 months was 5.3% and 24.5%, respectively. Though half of all infants were breastfed within one hour of birth, 73.3% were given prelacteal foods in the first three days after birth. Only 20.2% of children 0–5 months old were exclusively breastfed, while 32.4% were predominantly breastfed and 47.4% partially breastfed. After adjusting for confounders, early initiation of breastfeeding was associated with lower prevalence of diarrhea [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.74 (95% CI 0.58, 0.93)], while prelacteal feeding was associated with higher prevalence [AOR = 1.53 (95% CI 1.15, 2.03)]. Compared to infants who were exclusively breastfed, infants who were predominantly [AOR = 1.52 (95% CI 1.05, 2.21)] or partially breastfed [AOR = 1.55 (95% CI 1.07, 2.24)] were more likely to have diarrhea. Prelacteal feeding [AOR = 1.16 (95% CI 1.01, 1.33)] and partial breastfeeding [AOR relative to exclusive breastfeeding = 1.24 (95% CI 1.03, 1.48)] were associated with higher prevalence of ARI. While the protective effects of exclusive breastfeeding against diarrhea declined with child age, this effect for ARI appears to have remained constant.

Conclusions

Early initiation and exclusive breastfeeding protects against diarrhea and ARI. Results confirm that interventions to improve early and exclusive breastfeeding would contribute to improving child health and nutrition in Vietnam.

Keywords

ARIBreastfeedingDiarrheaInfantPrelacteal feedingVietnam

Background

The importance of breastfeeding to infant growth and development [1], as well as long-term health outcomes [2], are now well recognized. Apart from being a natural source of nourishment, human milk contains glycans and secretory immunoglobulin, which offer protection against infectious disease [3, 4]. During the first six months of life, when digestive systems are not yet mature, exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) offers additional protection from illness by limiting exposure to contaminated foods and liquids. Substantial evidence shows that EBF for six months is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality from gastrointestinal infections, namely diarrhea, compared to other breastfeeding practices [57]. Infants who are exclusively breastfed for only three to four months are more likely than those exclusively breastfed for six months to suffer from conditions such as respiratory and urinary tract infections [812], otitis media [8, 13, 14], and necrotizing enterocolitis [8, 15]. The protective effects of breastfeeding are more pronounced in settings with poor sanitation and hygiene, where contamination of foods and liquids is more likely [1618].

Based on such evidence, the World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends that infants be breastfed within one hour of birth, exclusively breastfed for the first six months, and then continue to be breastfed until they are two years or older along with appropriate complementary feeding initiated at the age of six months [19]. However, adoption of these recommendations remains low in developing countries where only 39% of infants are exclusively breastfed [20]. Vietnam is an example of a country where poor practice of EBF prevails [21].

Although breastfeeding is practiced by 98% of mothers in Vietnam [22], adherence to global recommendations on infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices is poor. Evidence shows that EBF rates among infants aged less than six months are in the range of 8 to 17% [21, 22], with rapid declines in rates over time [2325]. Premature introduction of solids and semi-solids during the first three months of life has also been documented [24, 26], while continued breastfeeding to 24 months of age remains low at 22% [27]. To our knowledge no studies to date, including the National Nutrition Survey and the Multiple Indicator-Cluster Survey, have explored the impact of such feeding practices on child illness in Vietnam. Country-specific data on the relationships between breastfeeding practices and infant infection are essential to advocate for policies supportive of early and EBF. The objective of this paper is to investigate the association of infant feeding practices with the prevalence of diarrhea and acute respiratory infection (ARI) among infants aged 0–5 months in Vietnam.

Methods

Data sources and study populations

This study used data from a baseline survey undertaken as part of an evaluation of Alive & Thrive (A&T), an initiative that aims to improve child nutrition by addressing suboptimal IYCF practices in Vietnam [28, 29]. The survey was conducted in 2011 in 340 communes of 11 provinces where the A&T program is implemented. A two-stage cluster sampling technique was used to obtain a representative sample of 10,834 pairs of mothers and children under the age of 24 months. For each province, this involved: 1) selecting communes using population proportional to size and 2) selecting mother–child pairs using systematic random sampling. Given the focus on early and exclusive breastfeeding practices, analysis in this study was restricted to a sample of 6,068 pairs of mothers and infants under the age of six months.

Ethics approval

Ethical approval for the survey was provided by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Institute of Social and Medicine Studies in Vietnam (IORG number: 000663, FWA number: 00016762). Written informed consent was obtained from all mothers participating in the study.

Data collection and variable definitions

Data for this study were drawn from a baseline household survey within the context of the larger evaluation of A&T’s interventions in Vietnam. This cross-sectional survey conducted in July and August 2011 was carried out in 11 provinces of 15 provinces where A&T operates. Data were collected by face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire. The outcomes of interest in this study were diarrhea and ARI, which were collected through maternal recall of symptoms in the two weeks prior to the survey. Diarrhea was defined as 3 or more loose stools in a 24-hour period [30], and ARI was defined as the presence of cough/cold with fever [31].

The main predictor was breastfeeding practices, which were classified and defined as per WHO indicators [32]: 1) early initiation of breastfeeding (defined as the proportion of children born in the last 24 months who were put to the breast within one hour of birth); 2) prelacteal feeding (defined as the proportion of children born in the last 24 months who were given any food or liquid other than breast milk during the first three days after birth); and 3) exclusive breastfeeding (defined as the proportion of infants 0–5 months of age who were fed exclusively with breast milk in the previous 24 hours - no foods, no liquids with the exception of medications such as drops, syrups). Two optional breastfeeding indicators were also considered in the analysis: 1) predominant breastfeeding (when the infant is given water, water-based drinks, fruit juice, ritual fluids, in addition to breast milk); and 2) partial breastfeeding (when the infant is given liquids and non-liquids such as milk, non-milk based products and other foods in addition to breast milk, non-breastfed infants were also included in this group).

Covariate variables were considered at the child, maternal, and household levels. At the child level, we adjusted for child age and gender. At the maternal level, we controlled for mother’s age, occupation, and highest level of education (primary, secondary, high school, and college or higher). At the household level, we adjusted for the household’s location, socioeconomic status (SES), and hygiene condition. Household location – urban or rural – was identified based on current administrative classifications in Vietnam [33]. SES index was calculated by principal components analysis [34], using several factors, such as ownership of property and land, household assets, housing conditions, and access to utilities. The SES index was then categorized into quintiles with the lowest quintile representing the ‘poorest’ in the population and the highest quintile representing the ‘richest’. For hygiene, we used two variables: type of toilet and sources of drinking water.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics were used to report the background characteristics and breastfeeding patterns of the study sample; percentage, mean and standard deviation (SD) are presented. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to examine the associations between different breastfeeding practices and the prevalence of diarrhea and ARI. Practices for which associations were significant (p < 0.05) in bivariate analysis were included in the final model which controlled for confounding factors related to the child, mother, and household. All statistical analyses were carried out using the Stata 11.0 statistical package (Stata Inc., TX, USA) [35]. The cluster command in Stata was used to adjust for clustering effects at the commune level.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Table 1 outlines the baseline sociodemographic characteristics of the study sample. The mean age of children was 3.3 months (SD 1.6, range 0.03-5.98), and there were around the same number of boys (52%) and girls (48%). The mean age of mothers was 27.3 years (SD 5.5, range: 16.5 - 47.3), and nearly half of them (48.2%) achieved secondary school as the highest level of education. The majority of mother-child pairs (83.3%) resided in rural areas. Over 60% of study households had toilets with septic or semi-septic tanks, and nearly half relied on open well, rain or pool/lake water as their main source of drinking water.
Table 1

Sociodemographic characteristics of children and mothers surveyed (n = 6,068 mother-child pairs)

Characteristic

Number (N)

Percentage or mean ± SD (range)

Age of the child (months)

6068

3.3 ± 1.6 (0.03- 9.58)

Sex of the child

  

 Female

2910

48.0

 Male

3158

52.0

Mother’s age (years)

6062

27.3 ± 5.5 (16.5- 47.3)

Mother’s occupation

  

 Farmer

2283

37.7

 Other

3770

62.3

Highest level of mother’s education

  

 Primary school or less

692

11.4

 Secondary school

2922

48.2

 High school

1489

24.5

 College or higher

964

15.9

Location of household

  

 Rural

5057

83.3

 Urban

1011

16.7

Socio-economic status of household

  

 Richest

1294

21.3

 Richer

1247

20.6

 Average

1270

20.9

 Poorer

1176

19.4

 Poorest

1081

17.8

Type of toilet in household

  

 Septic/semi-septic tank

3894

64.2

 One/two pit latrine

1249

20.6

 No latrine/other latrine

922

15.2

Source of household drinking water

  

 Bottled water

647

10.6

 Tap water

1272

21.0

 Closed/pumped well water

1251

20.6

 Open well water

1428

23.5

 Rain, lake, pool, river water

1469

24.2

Feeding practices

All children surveyed were ever breastfed. While half breastfed within one hour of birth, the majority of infants (73.3%) were also given prelacteal foods in the first three days after birth – namely infant formula, plain water, or honey. On average, only 20.2% of children 0–5 months old were exclusively breastfed, as opposed to 32.4% who were predominantly breastfed and 47.4% who were partially breastfed.Figure 1 provides a breakdown of breastfeeding patterns by child’s age in months. In the first month of life, 41.4% of infants were exclusively breastfed, and a similar percentage, 38.9%, predominantly breastfed. Prevalence of EBF, subsequently, declined over each consecutive month, primarily displaced by feeding of plain water, breast milk substitutes, and solid to semi-solid foods, to 6.2% by the age of 5 – 5.9 months. Around 20% of infants were introduced to solid and semi-solid foods in the first month after birth, a practice which becomes more prevalent after the age of three months: 80.5% of infants were partially breastfed at 5 months as opposed to 31.8% at 2 – 2.9 months.
Figure 1

Pattern of breastfeeding practices by age (months) among infants under 6 months old (n = 6,068).

Association of feeding practices with diarrhea and ARI

During the two weeks prior to the survey, 5.3% and 24.5% of all children had diarrhea and ARI respectively. The prevalence of ARI increased from 11% in the first 30 days to 33% in month five. Similarly, the prevalence of diarrhea increased from about 2% to 8% during the same period (Figure 2). Prevalence of illness varied depending on the type of breastfeeding practice (Figure 3). Table 2 presents the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for having diarrhea and ARI in the two previous weeks, by type of feeding practice. In bivariate analysis, early initiation and EBF were associated with lower odds of diarrhea, while the opposite was true for prelacteal feeding, predominant and partial breastfeeding. Similar results to bivariate analysis were confirmed in multivariate analysis after controlling for child, maternal, and household related factors. Adjusted odds ratios of diarrhea were 0.74 (95% CI 0.58, 0.93) for early initiation and 1.53 (95% CI 1.15, 2.03) for prelacteal feeding. Compared to exclusively breastfed infants, adjusted odds ratios of diarrhea were 1.52 (95% CI 1.05, 2.21) for predominantly and 1.55 (95% CI 1.07, 2.24) for partially breastfed children.
Figure 2

Prevalence of child illness in the previous two weeks by age (n = 6,068).

Figure 3

Bivariate association between breastfeeding pattern and child illness in infants under 6 months old (n = 6,068).

Table 2

Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of diarrhea and ARI in the previous two weeks by type of feeding practice, among children surveyed

 

Diarrhea

ARI

 

Unadjusted OR

Adjusted OR1

Unadjusted OR

Adjusted OR1

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

Early initiation of breastfeeding

    

 Yes

0.74*

0.74*

0.90*

0.91

(0.59 – 0.93)

(0.58 – 0.93)

(0.80 – 1.02)

(0.80 – 1.03)

 No

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Prelacteal feeding

    

 Yes

1.48**

1.53**

1.13*

1.16*

(1.12 – 1.95)

(1.15 – 2.03)

(0.99 – 1.30)

(1.01 – 1.33)

 No

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Breastfeeding status

    

 Exclusively breastfed

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Predominantly breastfed

1.51*

1.52*

1.13

1.04

(1.05 – 2.19)

(1.05 – 2.21)

(0.95 – 1.35)

(0.87 – 1.25)

 Partially breastfed

1.86***

1.55*

1.71***

1.24*

(1.32 – 2.62)

(1.07 – 2.24)

(1.46 – 2.02)

(1.03 – 1.48)

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

1Model adjusted for child (age, sex), mother (occupation, age, education), and household characteristics (location, socio-economic status, type of toilet, and source of drinking water).

Breastfeeding practice was also significantly associated with ARI. Compared to exclusively breastfed infants, the odds ratio for ARI among those who were partially breastfed was 1.71 (95% CI 1.46, 2.02). This association remained significant after adjusting for confounders [AOR: 1.24 (95% CI 1.03, 1.48)]. In addition, infants with prelacteal feeding were more likely to experience ARI compared to non-prelacteal feeding counterparts (AOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01, 1.33). While the protective effects of exclusive breastfeeding for diarrhea declined with child age, this effect for ARI appears to have remained constant (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Association between the absence of exclusive breastfeeding and the diarrhea (A) and acute respiratory infection (B) by age (n = 6,068).

Discussion

In line with previously reported evidence, we found that breastfeeding practices in Vietnam are still sub-optimal. While all infants were ever-breastfed, a mere 20.2% were exclusively breastfed with a decreasing trend in age-specific EBF over the six-month period. This confirms that in Vietnam, the percentage of infants exclusively breastfed for the first six months continues to be among the lowest of 14 countries in the Asia Pacific region, where only two other countries report percentages below 21% [22]. We also found that only half of all infants were breastfed within the first hour, similar to the range of 35 – 49% of infants reported in a recent study on breastfeeding practices in urban and rural areas in Vietnam [25].

An overwhelming majority of infants, 73.3%, were given prelacteal foods. Liquids, solids, and semi-solids were introduced as early as immediately after birth. This is of concern as evidence shows that premature initiation of semi-solid and solid foods is associated with increased risk of nutritional imbalances and infectious disease, which in turn impact on the physical growth of the infant [24, 36]. In the study on the association of complementary feeding with infant growth in Vietnam, Hop and colleagues found that infants who were partially breastfed or weaned during the first three months of life had lower weight and height gain compared to those who were exclusively breastfed [24]. Reasons cited for early introduction of complementary foods by Vietnamese mothers include concerns on the lack of sufficient breast milk production, the need to return to employment, and a lack of family support to care for the child [24, 26]. This highlights the need for strengthened programs to raise awareness on early and exclusive breastfeeding, as well as for more supportive policies and workplaces for mothers.

An important finding of this study is that breastfeeding helps prevent diarrhea in infancy. Vietnam has seen rapid increases in coverage of improved drinking water and sanitation between 1990 and 2010, from 57% to 95% and 37% to 76% respectively [37]. Evidence indicates that the protective effects of breastfeeding are stronger in settings without access to hygienic water and sanitation facilities, as a result of decreased likelihood of contaminated foods and liquids [1618]. In our study, even after controlling for several confounding factors related to the child, mother and household, the odds of diarrhea were still significantly lower among infants who were breastfed in the first hour after birth compared to those who were not. In addition, these odds were higher among infants who were predominantly or partially breastfed compared to those who were exclusively breastfed. These results suggest that the association between breastfeeding and reduced risk of diarrhea persists even in contexts with improved water and sanitation facilities.

Unlike other studies, however, we did not find that predominant breastfeeding was as protective against diarrhea as EBF – a phenomenon that has been reported in settings with hygienic water and sanitation facilities [38, 39]. Rather, we found that the adjusted odds ratios for diarrhea were roughly equal for predominantly and partially breastfed infants. This suggests that during the first few months of life, providing water and water-based liquids to infants is just as detrimental as the introduction of solids and semi-solids for risk of diarrheal illness.

For ARI, we also found lower prevalence of illness among infants who were exclusively breastfed compared to those who were predominantly or partially breastfed. This difference, however, was only significant for partial breastfeeding (adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03 – 1.48). Previous studies have documented lower prevalence of and mortality due to ARI among infants who are exclusively breastfed compared to those who are not [5, 40, 41]. In two Bangladeshi studies which used the same breastfeeding classifications as in this study, increased prevalence of and mortality due to ARI was also associated with partial breastfeeding only [39, 42]. As was the case for diarrhea, prelacteal feeding was also associated with higher prevalence of ARI (adjusted OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01 – 1.33), warranting the need for interventions tackling prelacteal feeding to protect infant from illness.

The stronger protective effect of optimal breastfeeding for diarrhea than for ARI may be explained by the differences in pathophysiology – gastrointestinal (GI) tract pathogens for diarrhea versus airborne pathogens for ARI. There are three pathways through which EBF can potentially protect against diarrhea: 1) limit introduction of diarrhea-causing pathogens to the GI tract; 2) immunoglobulin A in breast milk strengthens the immune system; and 3) breast milk contains glycans which function as soluble receptors that inhibit pathogens from adhering to their target receptors on the mucosal surface of the host gastrointestinal tract [3, 4]. Whereas for ARI, EBF can only be protective through the boost it provides to an infant’s immune system, however, it does not reduce exposure to the types of pathogens that cause ARI.

A limitation was the study’s cross-sectional design as identification of causal relationships between breastfeeding and child illness was not possible. In addition, data on severity and duration of diarrhea and ARI were not collected. These data would have provided insights on the pathways by which protection is conferred. Use of maternal recall to measure outcomes of interest may have biased our estimates of odds ratios, but the recall period was kept to two weeks in order to limit the potential of such bias. Despite these limitations, this analysis provides important country-specific evidence for policy makers to protect, promote, and support breastfeeding. To our knowledge, this is the first analysis to examine the relationship between breastfeeding practices and child illness in Vietnam. It is based on a large sample of infants representative of several provinces in Vietnam.

In conclusion, early initiation and exclusive breastfeeding protect against diarrhea and ARI. Results confirm that interventions to increase timely and exclusive breastfeeding would contribute to improving child health and nutrition in Vietnam.

Abbreviations

A & T: 

Alive & thrive

AOR: 

Adjusted odds ratio

ARI: 

Acute respiratory infection

CI: 

Confidence interval

EBF: 

Exclusive breastfeeding

IRB: 

Institutional review board

IYCF: 

Infant and young child feeding

SD: 

Standard deviation

SES: 

Socioeconomic status

WHO: 

World Health Organization.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Alive & Thrive (A&T), funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, is an initiative managed by FHI 360 to improve infant and young child nutrition. We are very grateful to Luann Martin, Silvia Alayon and Jean Baker from the Alive & Thrive Headquarters for their comments and suggestions to improve this manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Family Health International (FHI 360)
(2)
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
(3)
Independent Public Health Consultant

References

  1. Gartner LM, Morton J, Lawrence RA, Naylor AJ, O’Hare D, Schanler RJ, Eidelman AI: Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2005, 115 (2): 496-506.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Horta BL, Bahl R, Martines JC, Victora CG: Evidence on the long-term effects of breastfeeding: systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.Google Scholar
  3. Morrow AL, Ruiz-Palacios GM, Jiang X, Newburg DS: Human-milk glycans that inhibit pathogen binding protect breast-feeding infants against infectious diarrhea. J Nutr. 2005, 135 (5): 1304-1307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Noguera-Obenza M, Ochoa TJ, Gomez HF, Guerrero ML, Herrera-Insua I, Morrow AL, Ruiz-Palacios G, Pickering LK, Guzman CA, Cleary TG: Human milk secretory antibodies against attaching and effacing Escherichia coli antigens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003, 9 (5): 545-551.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Effect of breastfeeding on infant and child mortality due to infectious diseases in less developed countries: a pooled analysis. WHO Collaborative Study Team on the Role of Breastfeeding on the Prevention of Infant Mortality. Lancet. 2000, 355 (9202): 451-455.Google Scholar
  6. Kramer MS, Kakuma R: The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding: a systematic review. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2004, 554: 63-77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lamberti LM, Fischer Walker CL, Noiman A, Victora C, Black RE: Breastfeeding and the risk for diarrhea morbidity and mortality. BMC Public Health. 2011, 11 (Suppl 3): S15.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ip S, Chung M, Raman G, Chew P, Magula N, DeVine D, Trikalinos T, Lau J: Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007, 153: 1-186.Google Scholar
  9. Marild S, Jodal U, Hanson LA: Breastfeeding and urinary-tract infection. Lancet. 1990, 336 (8720): 942.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pisacane A, Graziano L, Zona G: Breastfeeding and urinary tract infection. Lancet. 1990, 336 (8706): 50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Victora CG, Smith PG, Barros FC, Vaughan JP, Fuchs SC: Risk factors for deaths due to respiratory infections among Brazilian infants. Int J Epidemiol. 1989, 18 (4): 918-925.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wright AL, Holberg CJ, Martinez FD, Morgan WJ, Taussig LM: Breast feeding and lower respiratory tract illness in the first year of life. Group Health Medical Associates. BMJ. 1989, 299 (6705): 946-949.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Aniansson G, Alm B, Andersson B, Hakansson A, Larsson P, Nylen O, Peterson H, Rigner P, Svanborg M, Sabharwal H, Svanborg C: A prospective cohort study on breast-feeding and otitis media in Swedish infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1994, 13 (3): 183-188.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Duncan B, Ey J, Holberg CJ, Wright AL, Martinez FD, Taussig LM: Exclusive breast-feeding for at least 4 months protects against otitis media. Pediatrics. 1993, 91 (5): 867-872.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lucas A, Cole TJ: Breast milk and neonatal necrotising enterocolitis. Lancet. 1990, 336 (8730): 1519-1523.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Butz WP, Habicht JP, DaVanzo J: Environmental factors in the relationship between breastfeeding and infant mortality: the role of sanitation and water in Malaysia. Am J Epidemiol. 1984, 119 (4): 516-525.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Clemens JD, Sack DA, Harris JR, Khan MR, Chakraborty J, Chowdhury S, Rao MR, van Loon FP, Stanton BF, Yunus M, Ali M, Ansaruzzaman M, Svennerholm A, Holmgren J: Breast feeding and the risk of severe cholera in rural Bangladeshi children. Am J Epidemiol. 1990, 131 (3): 400-411.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. VanDerslice J, Popkin B, Briscoe J: Drinking-water quality, sanitation, and breast-feeding: their interactive effects on infant health. Bull World Health Organ. 1994, 72 (4): 589-601.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. WHO: Global strategy for infant and young child feeding: the optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.Google Scholar
  20. Lauer JA, Betran AP, Victora CG, de Onis M, Barros AJ: Breastfeeding patterns and exposure to suboptimal breastfeeding among children in developing countries: review and analysis of nationally representative surveys. BMC Med. 2004, 2: 26.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Dibley MJ, Senarath U, Agho KE: Infant and young child feeding indicators across nine East and Southeast Asian countries: an analysis of National Survey Data 2000–2005. Public Health Nutr. 2010, 13 (9): 1296-1303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nguyen PH, Menon P, Ruel M, Hajeebhoy N: A situational review of infant and young child feeding practices and interventions in Vietnam. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2011, 20 (3): 359-374.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Duong DV, Binns CW, Lee AH: Breast-feeding initiation and exclusive breast-feeding in rural Vietnam. Public Health Nutr. 2004, 7 (6): 795-799.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hop LT, Gross R, Giay T, Sastroamidjojo S, Schultink W, Lang NT: Premature complementary feeding is associated with poorer growth of Vietnamese children. J Nutr. 2000, 130 (11): 2683-2690.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Thu HN, Eriksson B, Khanh TT, Petzold M, Bondjers G, Kim CN, Thanh LN, Ascher H: Breastfeeding practices in urban and rural Vietnam. BMC Public Health. 2012, 12: 964.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Duong DV, Binns CW, Lee AH: Introduction of complementary food to infants within the first six months postpartum in rural Vietnam. Acta Paediatr. 2005, 94 (12): 1714-1720.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. UNICEF: UNICEF and Nutritional Institute of Nutrition: a review of the nutrition situation in Viet Nam 2009–2010. 2011.Google Scholar
  28. Baker J, Sanghvi T, Hajeebhoy N, Abrha TH: Learning from the design and implementation of large-scale programs to improve infant and young child feeding. Food Nutr Bull. 2013, 34 (3 Suppl): S226-S230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Baker J, Sanghvi T, Hajeebhoy N, Martin L, Lapping K: Using an evidence-based approach to design large-scale programs to improve infant and young child feeding. Food Nutr Bull. 2013, 34 (3 Suppl): S146-S155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. WHO, UNICEF: Diarrhea: why children are still dying and what can be done. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.Google Scholar
  31. WHO: Infection prevention and control of epidemic- and pandemic-prone acute respiratory diseases in health care. WHO interim guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.Google Scholar
  32. WHO: Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices. Part 2: Measurements. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599290_eng.pdf.Google Scholar
  33. GSO: General Statistics Office of Viet Nam: statistical data: administrative unit, land and climate. 2010.http://www.gso.gov.vn.Google Scholar
  34. Vyas S, Kumaranayake L: Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan. 2006, 21 (6): 459-468.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. StataCorp: Stata Statistical Software Release 11. Texas: College Station, Stata Corporation; 2009.Google Scholar
  36. Przyrembel H: Timing of introduction of complementary food: short- and long-term health consequences. Ann Nutr Metab. 2012, 60 (Suppl 2): 8-20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. UNICEF: Progress on drinking water and sanitation 2012 update. USA: UNICEF and the World Health Organization; 2012.Google Scholar
  38. Bahl R, Frost C, Kirkwood BR, Edmond K, Martines J, Bhandari N, Arthur P: Infant feeding patterns and risks of death and hospitalization in the first half of infancy: multicentre cohort study. Bull World Health Organ. 2005, 83 (6): 418-426.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mihrshahi S, Kabir I, Roy SK, Agho KE, Senarath U, Dibley MJ: Determinants of infant and young child feeding practices in Bangladesh: secondary data analysis of Demographic and Health Survey 2004. Food Nutr Bull. 2010, 31 (2): 295-313.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lopez-Alarcon M, Villalpando S, Fajardo A: Breast-feeding lowers the frequency and duration of acute respiratory infection and diarrhea in infants under six months of age. J Nutr. 1997, 127 (3): 436-443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Victora CG, Smith PG, Vaughan JP, Nobre LC, Lombardi C, Teixeira AM, Fuchs SM, Moreira LB, Gigante LP, Barros FC: Evidence for protection by breast-feeding against infant deaths from infectious diseases in Brazil. Lancet. 1987, 2 (8554): 319-322.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Arifeen S, Black RE, Antelman G, Baqui A, Caulfield L, Becker S: Exclusive breastfeeding reduces acute respiratory infection and diarrhea deaths among infants in Dhaka slums. Pediatrics. 2001, 108 (4): E67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hajeebhoy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement