Skip to main content
Download PDF

The relationship between creamatocrit and cumulative percentage of total milk volume: a cross-sectional study in mothers of very preterm infants in Bangkok, Thailand

International Breastfeeding Journal volume 18, Article number: 63 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Human hindmilk contains higher concentrations of fat than foremilk and is more desirable for growth in preterm infants who can tolerate limited volumes of breastmilk. There is currently no clear demarcation between foremilk and hindmilk. This study characterized the change in breastmilk’s fat content from the start to end of milk flow and defined this demarcation.

Methods

Mothers of infants born at ≤ 32 weeks gestational age and ≥ 14 days after childbirth in a University hospital in Bangkok, Thailand between July, 2011, and April, 2012 were included in this cross-sectional study. Breastmilk samples were sequentially collected from the start to end of milk flow in 5-mL aliquots using breast pumps. The fat content of each aliquot from each breast was determined through creamatocrit. The average creamatocrit of foremilk and hindmilk were compared in predefined foremilk to hindmilk ratios of 20:80, 25:75, 33:67, and 50:50. Creamatocrit of the first and last aliquots were compared for mothers who expressed low- (≤ 25-mL per breast) and high-volumes (> 25-mL per breast) of breastmilk.

Results

Of the 25 mothers enrolled, one was excluded due to unsuccessful creamatocrit measurement. The last aliquot of breastmilk had a significantly higher creamatocrit than the first from the same breast (median [interquartile range] of 12.7% [8.9%, 15.3%] vs. 5.6% [4.3%, 7.7%]; test statistic 1128, p < 0.001). Mean creamatocrit in hindmilk portions (9.23%, 9.35%, 9.81%, and 10.62%, respectively) was significantly higher than foremilk portions (6.28%, 6.33%, 6.72%, and 7.17%, respectively) at all predefined ratios. Creamatocrit increased by 1% for every 10% incremental increase in expressed breastmilk volume until the breast was emptied. Low-volume mothers had a significantly higher creamatocrit in the first aliquot compared with high-volume mothers (U = 437, p = 0.002). No significant difference in breastmilk volume was observed between mothers with and without breastfeeding experience.

Conclusions

Fat content in breastmilk increased on an incremental basis. More fluid definitions of foremilk and hindmilk should be adopted. Mothers should prepare their breastmilk into aliquots based on the required feeding volume of their infant. Hindmilk aliquots can be prioritized over foremilk aliquots to ensure infants obtain optimal caloric intake.

Background

Human breastmilk is regarded as the best source of nutrition for newborns. Enteral feeding with breastmilk is associated with reduced necrotizing enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis, retinopathy of prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and neurodevelopmental impairment in preterm very low birth weight (VLBW) infants [1,2,3]. However, breastmilk alone does not meet the nutritional requirements of VLBW infants and should be fortified to optimize VLBW infants’ growth [2, 4].

Fat constitutes approximately 3–5% of human breastmilk and serves as the primary source of energy for infants [5]. This fat content can vary significantly for different mothers, as well as the same individual depending on the time of day and breastfeeding session [5,6,7]. During breastfeeding or breastmilk expression, the initial portion of the milk stream (foremilk) contains higher levels of lactose but lower fat content compared with the latter portion of the stream (hindmilk) [5, 8, 9]. This disparity in composition between foremilk and hindmilk significantly impacts the physiology of infants’ digestion. Foremilk mainly hydrates infants and acts as a mild laxative, while the higher fat content in hindmilk provides high caloric value to promote growth as well as delay the transit time of breastmilk in infants’ gastrointestinal tracts [5, 10]. Infants only receive the full range of benefits that human breastmilk has to offer when they can breastfeed until the breast is emptied, and a maximum amount of hindmilk is ingested.

When VLBW infants are critically ill and hospitalized, the amount of breastmilk that infants can tolerate is limited. As foremilk is expressed first, this inadvertently results in infants consuming little hindmilk – leading to inadequate weight gain. Several neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) reported that hindmilk feeding improved growth in premature infants [11,12,13,14]. Previous literature explicated foremilk and hindmilk inconsistently, as summarized in Table 1 [11, 15,16,17,18,19,20]. Defining the demarcation between foremilk and hindmilk in a milk stream can appear arbitrary. There are currently no standardized guidelines that can be reliably used to calculate the optimal volume of foremilk to be expressed before a desired portion of hindmilk can be obtained. Despite the general acceptance that hindmilk contains a higher fat content, previous literature has not ascertained when foremilk becomes hindmilk. This ambiguity is particularly problematic in clinical practice when infants have a limited breastmilk intake volume and should primarily receive the portion that will help them thrive.

Table 1 Previous definitions of foremilk and hindmilk
Full size table

Creamatocrit measurements are one means of assessing fat content in breastmilk, which is determined by centrifuging breastmilk in capillary tubes – akin to hematocrit measurements. The length of the fat and total milk columns can be measured using Vernier Calipers or a hematocrit reader, and the proportion of fat to total volume (creamatocrit) expressed in percentage [13, 18, 21, 22]. The use of centrifugal force to separate cream from milk may result in some fat remaining in the supernatant – hence, the slightly lower creamatocrit level compared with the gold-standard gravimetric method (which also indicates fat proportion) [21, 23, 24]. Regardless, creamatocrit remains a simple and reliable measurement that can be performed by nurses and non-medical personnel (mothers) alike [13, 21,22,23]. This proves extremely useful and practical in ascertaining the demarcation in breastmilk’s fat content from foremilk to hindmilk.

The primary objective of the study was to characterize the progressive changes in breastmilk’s fat content from the start to end of milk flow through creamatocrit. The secondary objective was to define a demarcation between foremilk and hindmilk.

Methods

Study design, setting, and participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand between July 1, 2011 and April 30, 2012. Siriraj Hospital is the largest tertiary care center in Thailand, with approximately 8,000 childbirths per year. Mothers of infants who were born at ≤ 32 weeks gestational age and ≥ 14 days after childbirth were included in the study. This was to ensure that expressed breastmilk consisted of mature milk. Mothers who used domperidone as a galactogogue or with an expressed breastmilk volume < 5-mL were excluded. Eligibility assessments were performed by W.B. and a practical nurse responsible for overseeing the neonatal ward’s lactation room. Mothers who stayed overnight in the neonatal ward were invited and informed of the study by W.B. All provided written informed consent prior to undergoing any study procedures.

Milk collection and creamatocrit measurements

Breastmilk from the start to end of milk flow from each breast was collected during the same breast pumping session. Breastmilk samples were collected in the lactation room of the neonatal ward where infants were admitted. Mothers were taught how to practice proper hygiene; this entailed thorough handwashing techniques with soap and water as well as how to clean their breasts with sterile water. All mothers used a Medela® electric breast pump (Medela AG, Switzerland; CE 0123) to collect their breastmilk in 5-mL aliquots into sequentially-labelled, sterile 5-mL bottles from the start to end of milk flow. Samples were separately collected from left and right breasts. Bottles collected towards the end of milk flow that had a volume < 5-mL were discarded. Breastmilk samples were kept at room temperature and creamatocrit measurements performed within 30 min of collection.

The proportion (in percentage) of breastmilk in each bottle was calculated based on the total expressed volume from each breast. The cumulative percentage of total milk volume (CP-MV) was calculated as shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Breastmilk sample collection process. Illustrated above is a demonstration of how a 40-mL (8 tubes) volume of breastmilk from one breast would be processed after collection in 5-mL aliquot. The cumulative percentage of total milk volume (CP-MV) was calculated as an example

Full size image

Creamatocrit measurements were performed by W.B. using Creamatocrit Plus® (Separation Technology, Inc. Florida, USA; ETL 9,700,686). Collection bottles were shaken to ensure thorough mixing before 0.2-mL of breastmilk was transferred from each bottle to two 75-µL creamatocrit tubes. These tubes were sealed with sealant before centrifugation in Creamatocrit Plus® for 3 min at 5,670-5,930 rounds per minute. Creamatocrit values were read thereafter using the machine-equipped reader tray and CP-MV calculated for each aliquot of breastmilk (as elaborated previously in Fig. 1)

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS® Studio 9.2 (SAS® Institute Inc.) and IBM® SPSS® Statistics 28 (SPSS® Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to present mothers’ demographic data. Creamatocrit values between the first and last sample aliquots from the same breast were compared using either paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, depending on the data distribution.

Four random-coefficient mixed models (linear with random intercept, linear with random intercept and slope, quadratic with random intercept, and quadratic with random intercept and slope) were fit to examine the relationship between CP-MV of a breast (represented by X) and its corresponding creamatocrit (represented by Y). The model with the lowest Akaike information criteria (AIC) and Bayesian information criteria (BIC) was selected as the final model [25]. Regression diagnostics using residuals from the final model were tested; assumptions were not violated [25]. A minimum of three data points were required to test non-linear relationship. Mothers who had less than three aliquots of breastmilk per breast on either side were excluded from the analysis. Data from the breast with greater breastmilk volume was used in the analysis for each mother. Data from the right breast was used when both breasts expressed equal volume.

The researchers hypothesized that hindmilk started at the point where the fat content rose significantly. To define this point of demarcation in the breastmilk stream, the researchers arbitrarily determined the proportion of foremilk as 20%, 25%, 33% and 50% of the milk stream. This constituted 20:80, 25:75, 33:67, and 50:50 ratios of foremilk:hindmilk, respectively (as shown in Fig. 2). The researchers then used paired t-tests to compare the average creamatocrit of the tubes designated as foremilk and hindmilk to determine the most appropriate ratio (proportion with a significant rise in creamatocrit levels).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Foremilk to hindmilk ratios. Illustrated above is a continuation of how the previous 40-mL volume of human breastmilk from one breast would be used to calculate the cumulative percentage of total milk volume (CP-MV) as predefined ratios of 20:80, 25:75, 33:67, and 50:50 of foremilk:hindmilk

Full size image

Results

Thirty-two mothers were assessed for eligibility, seven were excluded, and 25 were enrolled (Fig. 3). Mothers were recruited 15–70 days after childbirth (64% within 30 days). The mean (standard deviation [SD]) maternal age was 27.9 (6.3) years. Twelve out of 25 mothers had underlying diseases or complications during pregnancy; this included: twin pregnancies (n = 5), pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH, n = 4), and history of thyrotoxicosis (n = 3). The four mothers with PIH were clinically stable and did not receive any medication during the study period. The three mothers with a history of thyrotoxicosis were in a euthyroid state and did not receive any medication as well. Fourteen mothers (58%) had breastfeeding experience.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Flow diagram. Thirty-two participants were assessed for eligibility and 25 were enrolled. Sequential breastmilk samples were assessed for 24 participants, with one mother excluded from analyses due to unsuccessful creamatocrit measurements

Full size image

Many mothers (87.5%) exhibited a disparity in expressed breastmilk between their left and right breasts (Table 2). No significant difference in breastmilk volume was observed between mothers with and without breastfeeding experience (mean [SD] of 63.5 [44.2] mL vs. 55.4 [23.6] mL, respectively [t = 0.59, df = 22,p = 0.56])

Table 2 Expressed breastmilk per breast and total breastmilk volume from each mother
Full size table

The last aliquot of breastmilk had a significantly higher creamatocrit compared with the first aliquot from the same breast (median [IQR] of 12.7% [8.9%, 15.3%] and 5.6% [4.3%, 7.7%], respectively [test statistic 1128, Wilcoxon signed-rank test; p < 0.001])

Data from 23 mothers were included in the random-coefficient mixed model analysis, as one mother expressed less than three bottles of breastmilk per breast. Eleven mothers provided left-breast and 12 provided right-breast data. 155 aliquots of breastmilk were collected, with a range of 3–18 bottles per breast (mean [SD] of 6.7 [3.7] bottles). The results of fitting the four mixed models are summarized in Table 3. Model 2 – with linear, random intercept and slope – was selected as the final model as it had the smallest AIC and BIC. However, Model 2 centered CP-MV (Xc), which was impractical. Model 2.1 (Table 3) considers CP-MV (X) as an independent variable and was fitted to obtain the following final mixed model equation Y = 3.3157 + 0.09874 × X – where Y represented creamatocrit and X represented CP-MV. The creamatocrit increased by 1% for every 10% incremental increase in expressed breastmilk volume until the breast was emptied (Fig. 4)

Table 3 Random-coefficient mixed model analysis results
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Relationship between creamatocrit (%) and the cumulative percentage of total milk volume (CP-MV). A spaghetti plot was used to visually explore the relationship between creamatocrit and CP-MV. The bold line represents the fit regression line from the final mixed model (Model 2.1)

Full size image

Upon comparing the creamatocrit of different foremilk:hindmilk ratios, the mean creamatocrit in hindmilk portions (9.23%, 9.35%, 9.81%, and 10.62%, respectively) was significantly higher than foremilk portions (6.28%, 6.33%, 6.72%, and 7.17%, respectively) at all predefined ratios (20:80, 25:75, 33:67, and 50:50) (Supplementary Table S1).

Post hoc analyses were performed by grouping the expressed breastmilk volume from each breast into high-volume (> 25-mL) and low-volume (≤ 25-mL) groups (using the median 25-mL observed in the study as a reference volume). Low-volume mothers had a significantly higher creamatocrit in the first aliquot of breastmilk compared with high-volume mothers (p = 0.002, Table 4). The opposite was true for high-volume mothers (p = 0.005, Table 4).

Table 4 Creamatocrit of the first and last breastmilk aliquots in high-volume and low-volume groups
Full size table

Discussion

This study characterized the change in breastmilk’s fat content and explored the feasibility of defining a demarcation between foremilk and hindmilk from the start to end of milk flow. The researchers found that the fat content in breastmilk linearly increased towards the end of the milk stream (Fig. 4). It demonstrated a positive correlation between creamatocrit and subsequent aliquots of breastmilk collected over time (represented by CP-MV; Fig. 4). Regardless of the foremilk-to-hindmilk ratio, creamatocrit was consistently higher in portions of hindmilk compared with foremilk (1.5 times as high in the last than the first aliquots; Supplementary Table S1).

The positive correlation between CP-MV and creamatocrit observed in this study reaffirms previous observations that hindmilk contains a higher fat concentration than foremilk [11, 16, 19, 20, 26]. This progressive increase is explained by the increased number of milk fat globules released into breastmilk as the mammary lobe is emptied [27]. This study further explicated the correlation between creamatocrit and CP-MV to be a 1% increase in fat content for every 10% incremental increase in expressed breastmilk volume until the breast is emptied (Table 3, Model 2.1).

The observed incremental increase in breastmilk’s fat content also suggests that there is no exact point of demarcation between foremilk and hindmilk. For low-volume mothers, conventional definitions of foremilk could lead to breastmilk with high-fat content being mistakenly discarded – as a significantly higher creamatocrit was found in the first aliquot of breastmilk. For high-volume mothers, it is important to avoid overfeeding infants with foremilk, as a significantly higher creamatocrit is found in breastmilk expressed towards the end of the milk stream. This highlights the importance of understanding the typical breastmilk volume a mother expresses and that infants can consume to ensure a fat-rich portion can be sufficiently obtained for VLBW infants. The researchers suggest that a more fluid definition of foremilk and hindmilk be adopted. This would enable clinicians to capture as much of hindmilk’s nutritional and caloric values as possible for infants with limited feeding volumes – preventing poor growth outcomes. It is also crucial to emphasize the importance of fully emptying the breast during breastmilk expression. This both increases breastmilk volume by removing the feedback inhibitor of lactation as well as optimizes fat-rich hindmilk collection [28].

Mothers can prepare their breastmilk into aliquots based on the required feeding volume of their infant(s). However, caution should still be exercised when prioritizing hindmilk over foremilk. For example, retinol and alpha-tocopherol were found in higher concentrations in hindmilk than foremilk [16]. In addition, despite the significantly greater total protein content in hindmilk, foremilk contains significantly higher total free amino acids [19]. The physiological importance of the different nutritional components of foremilk and hindmilk requires further investigation. Once able, infants should consume breastmilk from the start to end of milk flow to ensure sufficient nutrition and calories required for growth.

Previous literature found that mothers with previous breastfeeding experience expressed a greater volume of breastmilk than mothers with no experience [17, 29]. This could be explained by the greater number of prolactin receptors present in the mammary glands of multiparous compared with primiparous mothers [29]. This study found no association between breastfeeding experience and expressed breastmilk volume. However, the breastmilk analyzed in this study was collected from a single pumping session, and therefore, may not be representative of the total breastmilk volume expressed each day [30]. In addition, several factors affect breastmilk production, for instance: childbirth type, onset of lactogenesis II, frequency of breastmilk expression, breast pump type, underlying disease(s), and mothers’ concomitant medication [31,32,33]. However, analyzing the influence of such factors was beyond the scope of this study. The disproportionate number of women with previous thyrotoxicosis is likely due to under-treated hypothyroidism or their underlying autoimmune conditions taking their natural course, resulting in premature childbirths.

This study had some limitations. First, the lack of data on maternal nutrition that may affect the nutritional compositions of breastmilk. Second, creamatocrit measurements were performed by a single researcher. While there is a risk of systematic measurement errors, this was highly unlikely due to the extensive training undergone by the researcher before measurements were performed. Third, the sample size was limited by resources and calculations were performed post hoc. Fourth, this was a single-center study that included mothers of very preterm infants. The findings of this study may not be generalizable to late preterm or full-term infants. Fifth, the disparity in infants’ age. However, this disparity was not a primary concern of this study, as it focused on the change in fat concentration from the start to end of milk flow. Hence, any variability in fat content found across a range of ages was welcomed. Additionally, mothers were recruited at least two weeks after childbirth in order to obtain mature milk, which already has less variation in fat concentration compared with the first two weeks after childbirth [34].

Conclusions

The fat content in breastmilk increases from the start to end of milk flow. To ensure optimal nutrition for an infant, practitioners should recommend individualized feeding regimens and adopt more fluid definitions of foremilk and hindmilk. Mothers may also prepare their breastmilk in aliquots based on the required feeding volume of their infant, prioritizing aliquots of hindmilk before foremilk to ensure optimal caloric intake. Hindmilk feeding regimens warrant further nutritional considerations

Data Availability

The data sets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AIC:

Akaike information criteria

BIC:

Bayesian information criteria

CI:

confidence interval

COA:

certificate of approval

CP-MV:

cumulative percentage of total milk volume

IQR:

interquartile range

mL:

milliliter

µL:

microliter

NICU:

neonatal intensive care unit

SD:

standard deviation

VLBW:

very low birth weight

wk:

week

References

  1. Miller J, Tonkin E, Damarell RA, McPhee AJ, Suganuma M, Suganuma H, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of human milk feeding and morbidity in very low birth weight infants. Nutrients. 2018;10(6):707.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Parker MG, Stellwagen LM, Noble L, Kim JH, Poindexter BB, Puopolo KM, et al. Promoting human milk and breastfeeding for the very low birth weight infant. Pediatrics. 2021;148(5):e2021054272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Altobelli E, Angeletti PM, Verrotti A, Petrocelli R. The impact of human milk on necrotizing enterocolitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2020;12(5):1322. This recent meta-analysis demonstrates the impact of breastmilk towards reducing necrotizing enterocolitis in very preterm infants.

  4. Meek JY, Noble L. Policy statement: breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2022;150(1):e2022057988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lawrence RA. Biochemistry of human milk. In: Lawrence RA, Lawrence RM, editors. Breastfeeding: a guide for the medical profession. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2022. pp. 93–144.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson DA, Imong SM, Silprasert A, Ruckphaopunt S, Woolridge MW, Baum JD, et al. Circadian variation in fat concentration of breast-milk in a rural northern Thai population. Br J Nutr. 1988;59(3):349–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown KH, Black RE, Robertson AD, Akhtar NA, Ahmed G, Becker S. Clinical and field studies of human lactation: methodological considerations. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982;35(4):745–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin CR, Ling PR, Blackburn GL. Review of infant feeding: key features of breast milk and infant formula. Nutrients. 2016;8(5):279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ballard O, Morrow AL. Human milk composition: nutrients and bioactive factors. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013;60(1):49–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. La Leche League International. Foremilk and Hindmilk [cited 2023 September 24]. Available from: https://llli.org/breastfeeding-info/foremilk-and-hindmilk/.

  11. Valentine CJ, Hurst NM, Schanler RJ. Hindmilk improves weight gain in low-birth-weight infants fed human milk. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1994;18(4):474–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogechi AA, William O, Fidelia BT. Hindmilk and weight gain in preterm very low-birthweight infants. Pediatr Int. 2007;49(2):156–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Griffin TL, Meier PP, Bradford LP, Bigger HR, Engstrom JL. Mothers’ performing creamatocrit measures in the NICU: accuracy, reactions, and cost. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2000;29(3):249–57. This paper demonstrates the ease of use of creamatocrit measurements for mothers of preterm infants.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Alshaikh BN, Festival J, Reyes Loredo A, Yusuf K, Towage Z, Fenton TR et al. Hindmilk as a rescue therapy in very preterm infants with suboptimal growth velocity. Nutrients. 2023;15(4):929. This recent study demonstrates the benefits of feeding hindmilk to very preterm infants with poor growth. However, large randomized controlled trials are required to further explore hindmilk’s benefits.

  15. Uyan ZS, Ozek E, Bilgen H, Cebeci D, Akman I. Effect of foremilk and hindmilk on simple procedural pain in newborns. Pediatr Int. 2005;47(3):252–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bishara R, Dunn MS, Merko SE, Darling P. Nutrient composition of hindmilk produced by mothers of very low birth weight infants born at less than 28 weeks’ gestation. J Hum Lact. 2008;24(2):159–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bishara R, Dunn MS, Merko SE, Darling P. Volume of foremilk, hindmilk, and total milk produced by mothers of very preterm infants born at less than 28 weeks of gestation. J Hum Lact. 2009;25(3):272–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Murase M, Mizuno K, Nishida Y, Mizuno N, Taki M, Yoshizawa M, et al. Comparison of creamatocrit and protein concentration in each mammary lobe of the same breast: does the milk composition of each mammary lobe differ in the same breast? Breastfeed Med. 2009;4(4):189–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van Sadelhoff JHJ, Mastorakou D, Weenen H, Stahl B, Garssen J, Hartog A. Short communication: differences in levels of free amino acids and total protein in human foremilk and hindmilk. Nutrients. 2018;10(12):1828.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Takumi H, Kato K, Nakanishi H, Tamura M, Ohto NT, Nagao S, et al. Comprehensive analysis of lipid composition in human foremilk and hindmilk. J Oleo Sci. 2022;71(7):947–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Meier PP, Engstrom JL, Murtaugh MA, Vasan U, Meier WA, Schanler RJ. Mothers’ milk feedings in the neonatal intensive care unit: accuracy of the creamatocrit technique. J Perinatol. 2002;22(8):646–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Meier PP, Engstrom JL, Zuleger JL, Motykowski JE, Vasan U, Meier WA, et al. Accuracy of a user-friendly centrifuge for measuring creamatocrits on mothers’ milk in the clinical setting. Breastfeed Med. 2006;1(2):79–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tie WJ, Kent JC, Tat Lai C, Rea A, Hepworth AR, Murray K, et al. Reproducibility of the creamatocrit technique for the measurement of fat content in human milk. Food Chem. 2021;356:129708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Du J, Gay MCL, Lai CT, Trengove RD, Hartmann PE, Geddes DT. Comparison of gravimetric, creamatocrit and esterified fatty acid methods for determination of total fat content in human milk. Food Chem. 2017;217:505–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT® 15.1 User’s Guide The MIXED Procedure: Cary. NC:SAS Institute Inc.; 2018.

  26. Daly SE, Di Rosso A, Owens RA, Hartmann PE. Degree of breast emptying explains changes in the fat content, but not fatty acid composition, of human milk. Exp Physiol. 1993;78(6):741–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mizuno K, Nishida Y, Taki M, Murase M, Mukai Y, Itabashi K, et al. Is increased fat content of hindmilk due to the size or the number of milk fat globules? Int Breastfeed J. 2009;4:7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lawrence RA. Physiology of Lactation. In: Lawrence RA, Lawrence RM, editors. Breastfeeding: a guide for the medical profession. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2022. pp. 58–92.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Zuppa AA, Tornesello A, Papacci P, Tortorolo G, Segni G, Lafuenti G, et al. Relationship between maternal parity, basal prolactin levels and neonatal breast milk intake. Biol Neonate. 1988;53(3):144–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cregan MD, Hartmann PE. Computerized breast measurement from conception to weaning: clinical implications. J Hum Lact. 1999;15(2):89–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fewtrell MS, Kennedy K, Ahluwalia JS, Nicholl R, Lucas A, Burton P. Predictors of expressed breast milk volume in mothers expressing milk for their preterm infant. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;101(6):F502–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Miao Y, Zhao S, Liu W, Jiang H, Li Y, Wang A, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of delayed onset lactogenesis II in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023;36(1):2214833.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Murase M, Nommsen-Rivers L, Morrow AL, Hatsuno M, Mizuno K, Taki M, et al. Predictors of low milk volume among mothers who delivered preterm. J Hum Lact. 2014;30(4):425–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mimouni FB, Nathan N, Ziegler EE, Lubetzky R, Mandel D. The use of multinutrient human milk fortifiers in preterm infants: a systematic review of unanswered questions. ClinPerinatol. 2017;44(1):173–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the mothers who provided their valuable breastmilk for the study. The authors thank Professor Chulathida Chomchai, M.D., Mark Simmerman, Ph.D., Professor Kulkanya Chokephaibulkit, M.D., and Katherine Copeland for their comments and English language editing. We also thank Earth Line Co., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand, for providing the Creamatocrit Plus® and creamatocrit tubes used in the study at no cost. The company was not involved in the study design or collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, or the manuscript writing.

Funding

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand

    Walaiporn Bowornkitiwong & Sopapan Ngerncham

  2. Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Health Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Chulaluk Komoltri

Authors
  1. Walaiporn Bowornkitiwong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chulaluk Komoltri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sopapan Ngerncham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors participated in the conception and design of the study, including the statistical analysis plan. WB acquired the data. All authors analyzed and interpreted the data. CK is the responsible statistician. SN drafted the manuscript text and all authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript submitted for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sopapan Ngerncham.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved on June 22, 2011 by the Siriraj Institutional Review Board (SIRB) of the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University (COA Si 343/2011). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bowornkitiwong, W., Komoltri, C. & Ngerncham, S. The relationship between creamatocrit and cumulative percentage of total milk volume: a cross-sectional study in mothers of very preterm infants in Bangkok, Thailand. Int Breastfeed J 18, 63 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-023-00599-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-023-00599-5

Keywords

International Breastfeeding Journal

ISSN: 1746-4358