Skip to main content
Download PDF

Cost analysis of establishing and operating the first human milk bank at Da Nang Hospital for Women and Children in Vietnam: an activity-based costing ingredients study

International Breastfeeding Journal volume 19, Article number: 47 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Breastfeeding is the biological norm for feeding infants and young children. When mothers’ breastmilk is unavailable, donor human milk (DHM) from a human milk bank (HMB) becomes the next option for small vulnerable newborns. A comprehensive cost analysis is essential for understanding the investments needed to establish, operate, and scale up HMBs. This study aims to estimate and analyze such costs at the first facility established in Vietnam.

Methods

An activity-based costing ingredients (ABC-I) approach was employed, with the cost perspective from service provision agencies (specifically, the project conducted at Da Nang Hospital for Women and Children and Development Partners). Estimated financial costs, based on actual expenditures, were measured in 2023 local currency and then converted to 2023 US dollars (USD). We examined three scenarios: 1) direct start-up costs + indirect start-up costs + implementation costs, 2) direct start-up costs + implementation costs, and 3) capital costs + implementation costs over the 6.5 years of operation.

Results

The total start-up cost was USD 616,263, with total expenditure on direct activities at USD 228,131 and indirect activities at USD 388,132. Investment in equipment accounted for the largest proportion (USD 84,213). The monthly costs of Da Nang HMB were USD 25,217, 14,565, and 9,326, corresponding to scenarios 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Over HMB's 6.5 years of operation, on average, the unit costs were USD 166, USD 96, and USD 62 for DHM received and USD 201, USD 116, and USD 74 for pasteurized DHM meeting specified criteria in the corresponding scenarios. Unit costs were highest in the initial six months, decreased, and reached their lowest levels after a year. Then, the unit costs experienced an increase in late 2020 and early 2021.

Conclusion

Although the unit cost of DHM in Da Nang HMB is comparable to that in certain neighboring countries, intentional measures to reduce disposal rates, improve HMB efficiency, motivate more community-based donors, and establish an HMB service network should be implemented to lower costs.

Background

Breastfeeding is the biological norm for feeding infants and young children. The World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF recommend early initiation of breastfeeding within an hour of birth, exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life, and continued breastfeeding with complementary foods for two or more years [1]. Breastmilk is safe and clean and contains antibodies that help protect against common childhood illnesses. Breastfed children perform better on intelligence tests, are less likely to be overweight or obese and are less prone to diabetes later in life. Women who breastfeed also have a reduced risk of breast and ovarian cancers [2].

Suboptimal breastfeeding increases the risk of child mortality, annually resulting in nearly 600,000 deaths among children worldwide [3]. Additionally, it is associated with an annual loss of 21.9 billion liters of breastmilk, equivalent to USD 2.2 trillion, or 10% of the US GDP, 3.7% of APEC’s combined GDP, 12% of the BRICS countries’ combined GDP, 12% of the EU’s combined GDP, and 66% of ASEAN’s combined GDP [4]. In lower- and middle-income countries, the increasing use of complementary feeding for infants aged under 6 months results in emissions of 6.0-7.5 billion kilograms of CO2 equivalent greenhouse gases and 2,562.5 billion liters of water [5].

When mothers’ breastmilk is unavailable, the WHO recommends donor human milk (DHM) from a human milk bank (HMB) as the next option [1, 6]. An HMB is a service that screens, collects, processes, and distributes human breast milk to meet infants' needs for optimal health and development [7]. Donating mothers are recruited, and DHM is collected, stored, processed, and distributed to infants in need [7]. The mission is to supply safe, high-quality DHM to address the needs of infants whose mothers' breastmilk is unavailable. The recipients encompass newborns without access to their mothers' breastmilk, with a particular focus on small vulnerable newborns, including preterm, low birth weight, and sick infants, as well as orphans [8]. The integration of HMBs into health systems is a vital step in ensuring access to safe DHM for infants without access to their mothers’ breastmilk, contributing to a strong start in life [9].

Mothers’ breastmilk and DHM are particularly important for preterm babies because they reduce the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), retinopathy of prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and some complications of surgery for congenital heart diseases, brain malformations, thoracic and gastrointestinal abnormalities, or those involving other organs [10, 11]. The use of DHM feeds also helps bridge the gap for newborns temporarily separated from their mothers or when mothers’ breastmilk is not yet available or sufficient [12, 13]. Previous studies have shown that early and exclusive breastfeeding in the first few days of life is critical because it affects exclusive breastfeeding under six months and continued breastfeeding [14, 15].

In Vietnam, before the establishment of the first HMB, the prevalence of low birth weight was 8.2% in 2015, which decreased from 9.2% in 2000. In 2015, although 96.6% of children had ever been breastfed, only 26.5% of babies were breastfed within one hour of birth, and 67.8% of newborns started breastfeeding within one day of birth [16]. The main reason leading to the late initiation of breastfeeding is the insufficient implementation of provider-driven early essential newborn care practices as well as other breastfeeding protection, promotion, and support at health facilities [17,18,19]. An additional reason is the lack of DHM from an HMB given to newborns when the mother’s breastmilk is unavailable [8, 13], resulting in health facilities stocking and endorsing commercial milk formula and even allowing industry representatives to access the facilities [20]. The establishment of an HMB in Vietnam is critical for providing optimal nutrition for small vulnerable newborns and encouraging the community to view using DHM as the 'new normal' for breastfeeding when mothers’ breastmilk is unavailable.

Additionally, there was a need for the development of national guidelines and the scaling up of the HMB network in Vietnam. A costing study is needed to provide data on the cost of establishing and operating an HMB, as well as the unit cost of providing DHM to eligible children. Furthermore, there is a global scarcity of literature on business cases for investing in HMBs.

To address these needs, this study was conducted to examine the establishment, operation, and unit costs of Da Nang HMB, the first HMB in Vietnam, located at Da Nang Hospital for Women and Children (DNHWC). It considers various scenarios involving financial resources and technical support. The findings of this study have been used to guide the establishment and operation of the Da Nang HMB, as well as four additional HMBs and two HMB satellites, which were primarily established with national technical support.

Methods

Study site

Da Nang, a class-1 municipality in Vietnam's central coastal region, spans 1,284.73 square kilometers. It serves as the hub for Central Vietnam's economy, culture, and education, with a population of 1,195,490 and an annual birth rate of 18.68 per thousand. In 2021, Da Nang's infant mortality rate was 8.19 per thousand live births, lower than the national average of 13.65 [21].

DNHWC is a tertiary hospital with 1,200 beds that serves three provinces and has 4.4 million people. The hospital oversees more than 15,000 annual births and specializes in high-risk pregnancies and sick children in the central region. DNHWC is nationally and internationally recognized for its expertise in breastfeeding practices, early essential newborn care, and kangaroo mother care [21].

The Da Nang HMB was established in February 2017. The establishment of this HMB involved various stakeholders, including the Ministry of Health, Da Nang City Department of Health, DNHWC, Alive & Thrive, PATH, and partners and consultants [9]. According to HMB monitoring data, as of July 31, 2023, this HMB had received 11,826 L of donor milk from 586 donors and administered pasteurized donor milk (PDM) to 31,736 newborns over 6.5 years. This HMB served newborns in need in this hospital as well as those in other hospitals in Da Nang city and provided pasteurized DHM to its satellite in Quang Nam province.

Costing approach

An activity-based costing (ABC) ingredient approach, which combines activity-based costing and ingredient methods, was employed. The ABC method defines the principal activities needed for the program [22, 23]. The ingredient approach involves identifying and costing out all the individual components or ingredients that go into a product or service [24]. We identified the types of inputs, such as building, furniture, equipment, vehicle depreciation, personnel, supplies, water, and electricity costs. We also determined the quantities of the inputs used by the program and the cost per unit of the inputs.

Four main groups of activities related to breastmilk donor involvement, milk handling, processing, milk usage, and general expenses were included in the running phase [9]. More specifically, activities related to breastmilk donor involvement included three processes: screening of donor mothers, selecting donor mothers, and preparing and managing empty containers for donor mothers. The activities related to breastmilk handling and processing included six processes: DHM pasteurization, screening, microbiological testing of pre- and post-pasteurization DHM samples, storage of raw and pasteurized DHM, DHM handling, and transportation. The activities related to DHM usage included two processes: estimating, requesting, and receiving pasteurized DHM and using pasteurized DHM. Finally, activities related to the general operation of the bank included 17 processes: standard of practice (SOP) composition and approval, cleaning and sterilizing instruments, handling HMB instruments, cleaning of functional rooms at the HMB, internal supervision, file storage and writing, detecting and solving incidents, pasteurizer and freezer operation and maintenance, refrigerator maintenance and operation, operation and maintenance of microbiological cultures, operation and maintenance of instrument cleaning, operation and maintenance of a mini autoclave, operation and maintenance of breast pumps, collection and transportation of DHM received from the community, label adherence, and handwashing. In other words, 28 activities were listed for cost calculation in the present study [9].

Cost perspective

The study's perspective determined which costs were relevant and should be included in the cost analysis, considering who bears the costs [24]. Costs for this first HMB in Vietnam were estimated from the perspective of the service provision agencies, including the HMB project, DNHWC, and other development partners.

Scope of cost

In this study, we estimated financial costs based on actual expenditures. Expenditure refers to the amount of money spent during a specific period. Costs reflect the resources needed to produce outputs/products during that period [25].

In this study, expenditure and financial costs (accounting costs) were obtained through expenditure reports and all related receipts. Financial costs represent actual expenditures on goods and services purchased. Financial costs were thus described in terms of how much money has been paid for the resources used [24]. This study excluded the opportunity costs incurred by patients and family members.

Phase of cost

Both start-up and implementation expenditures/costs were included. Start-up expenditures/costs were resources used for activities implemented between the decision to implement a program and the first time it provided DHM to a small vulnerable newborn [26]. Implementation expenditures/costs were resources used for routine activities.

Nature of costs

Both capital and recurrent expenditure/cost items were captured: Capital expenditures were one-time expenses to acquire assets, which were normally expensive (e.g., building, furniture, equipment, vehicles). Recurrent costs, including personnel, supplies, and operational expenses such as water and electricity, were incurred within a single financial or accounting year.

Function of costs

Both direct and indirect costs were measured. Direct costs were resources used for implementing the activities directly linked to the process of service delivery (donor involvement; DHM collection, handling, processing, and usage; and general operational expenses); indirect costs were resources used for activities that could not be attributed to a particular program, such as overhead and information, education, and communication activities. The costs included in this study are presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Costs included in this study

Full size image

Data collection

The data were collected in 2016 and 2017 by a research team from the Center of Population Health Science, Hanoi University of Public Health. The team reviewed activity and expenditure reports to extract data on start-up activities and expenditures. For each activity, we identified costs by location and financial ingredient (e.g., staff cost, materials, supplies, transportation, building, equipment).

Field visits to DNHWC were conducted twice to collect data on implementation activities. In-depth interviews with HMB staff and direct observation of HMB procedures were performed during these field visits to calculate implementation costs.

Data management and analysis

The data were entered into a computer using Excel spreadsheets. Costs were presented in Vietnamese dong (VND) for expenses in Vietnam or in US dollars (USD) for expenses overseas. All costs were measured on June 15, 2023, in local currency units and converted to 2023 US dollars at an exchange rate of 1 USD = 23,881 VND, as announced by the State Bank of Vietnam [27].

The total monthly cost was estimated in two steps: Step 1 involved allocating expenditure from the start-up phase to the monthly start-up cost using useful years and the inflation rate, and step 2 involved adding the monthly implementation cost to the monthly start-up cost.

The unit cost is calculated as 1) cost per liter of pasteurized DHM that is suitable for use (i.e., meeting standards such as pre- and post-pasteurization tests, physiological appearance, and within expiration dates) and 2) cost per liter of DHM expressed by mothers (raw breastmilk) for international comparison purposes.

Three cost scenarios were examined (Table 1):

  • Scenario 1: Total costs (direct start-up costs + indirect start-up costs + implementation costs).

  • Scenario 2: Total direct costs (direct start-up costs + implementation costs).

  • Scenario 3: Total processing cost (capital costs + implementation costs).

Table 1 Three cost scenarios
Full size table

Results

Startup costs

The start-up phase occurred from January 2015 to the end of January 2017. The total start-up cost of the HMB project was USD 616,263 (Table 2). The total expenditure on direct activities was USD 228,131, and that on indirect activities was USD 388,132. Investment in equipment accounted for the largest proportion (USD 85,775).

Table 2 Total start-up expenditure of the Da Nang HMB by activity group
Full size table

Implementation costs

Total monthly cost of the Da Nang HMB

As shown in Table 3, the monthly cost of Da Nang HMB based on the first scenario (direct start-up costs + indirect start-up costs + implementation costs) was USD 25,217. The monthly cost based on the second scenario (direct start-up costs + implementation costs) was USD 14,565, and the monthly cost based on the third scenario (capital costs + implementation costs) was USD 9,326.

Table 3 Monthly costs of Da Nang HMB by activity group
Full size table

The breakdown of the monthly cost

Figure 2 presents the composition of the monthly cost of HMB based on the three scenarios. For scenario 1 (including all costs), start-up costs accounted for the largest share (67.9%), of which 25.7% were for direct activities and 42.2% were for indirect activities. Implementation costs made up 32.1% of the monthly cost of HMB. With scenario 2 (excluding indirect costs from scenario 1), direct start-up costs accounted for 44.4%. Related activities in the implementation phase made up 55.6% of the total HMB cost per month. Finally, scenario 3 (excluding training, guideline development, routine monitoring, and the SBCC) reveals that direct start-up costs, presented as capital costs only, accounted for 13.2% of the total cost per month. Related activities in the implementation phase made up 86.8% of the total HMB cost per month.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Composition of the monthly cost of HMB based on different scenarios. Scenario 1: direct start-up costs + indirect start-up costs + implementation costs; scenario 2: direct start-up costs + implementation costs; scenario 3: capital costs + implementation costs

Full size image

Figure 3 presents the breakdowns of the monthly implementation expenditures by ingredient and activity group. The expenditures on personnel and administration work made up considerable shares of the total monthly implementation expenditure (69.1% and 13.6%, respectively). The expenditures on medical consumables, tests, and disinfection accounted for 17.2% of the total expenditure.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Breakdowns of the monthly implementation expenditure by ingredients (A) and activity group (B) out of a total of USD 8,096. The data are presented as USD, %

Full size image

DHM handling and processing accounted for the largest share (42.7%), followed by DHM usage (25.2%) of the total implementation expenditure (Fig. 3). Expenditures on activities related to donor involvement and to donor involvement, equipment operation and maintenance, management, and supervision accounted for 16.9% and 15.3%, respectively, of the total implementation expenditures (Fig. 3).

Unit cost

In the initial 12 months of operation, the proportion of pasteurized DHM that passed both pre- and post-pasteurization tests was low in the first (59.6%) and second (53.8%) six months (denoted as semesters) (Fig. 4). Subsequently, it increased significantly to a range of 84.4% to 94.7% (Fig. 4). The percentage of DHM used for pasteurization started at 83.6% in the first semester, increased to 101.2% in semester 2 and then fluctuated between the lowest value of 77.4% in semester 12 and highest values of 108.4% in semester 5 (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The percentage of DHM pasteurized and pasteurized DHM passed pre- and post-screening tests. SEM: semester, every six months

Full size image

Over the 6.5 years of operation, the average costs for DHM received in its raw form were USD 166, USD 96, and USD 62 for scenarios 1, 2, and 3, respectively (Fig. 5). The corresponding costs for pasteurized DHM meeting the specified criteria were USD 201, USD 116, and USD 74. However, these values exhibited variation over time. Costs were highest in the initial six months, decreased, and reached their lowest levels after one year. Subsequently, values experienced an increase in late 2020 and early 2021 (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The cost (USD) of each liter of raw breastmilk (A), breastmilk pasteurized (B), and pasteurized DHM met the pre- and posttest criteria (C). SEM: semester, every six months. Scenario 1: direct start-up costs + indirect start-up costs + implementation costs; scenario 2: direct start-up costs + implementation costs; scenario 3: capital costs + implementation costs

Full size image

Discussion

The cost of establishing Da Nang HMB is high

This was the first costing study of an HMB in Vietnam, which was the first facility established in the country. We found that the total expenditure on the Da Nang HMB in 2023, at USD 616,263 (under scenario 1, with all costs included), is higher than the USD 225,000 reported in a study conducted in Australia in 2012 [28]. Because this was the first HMB, there was limited national experience. The involvement of international experts, overseas learning exchanges, and attending conferences to build networks added costs. Furthermore, conducting formative research, feeding studies, and designing a monitoring system are expensive and require external experts. In addition, the Da Nang HMB applied high standards and was even more conservative than European HMBs [9]. For example, after formative research identified DHM safety as the greatest concern, Da Nang HMB decided to pool DHM from a single donor, which made it easier to track any problems. This requirement necessitated at least three large freezers, which increased costs. Additionally, applying 'operation room' standards to design the storage and processing room for DHM further increased costs. The Da Nang HMB also purchased a laminar flow hood to provide a sterile working area for milk processing before pasteurization and for splitting milk from containers into smaller portions to distribute to recipients. For the first HMB, additional expenses were needed to advocate for and inform communities about the HMB [15]. If indirect activities were not included (i.e., scenario 3), the total expenditure of the Da Nang HMB (USD 228,131) would be similar to the figure reported by this Australian study of USD 200,000–250,000 [28].

Including various scenarios would help to identify financial needs in various settings

Scenario 1 entails the costs of the first HMB in settings with limited national experience and heavy dependence on external expertise. Additionally, research is needed to direct the operation of HMB or generate knowledge. Scenario 2 would apply to settings with strong national expertise (e.g., from the second HMB in Vietnam), even though national guidelines may not be available. Scenario 3 can be used for the scaling-up period of HMB networks under the guidance of experienced national experts and national guidelines. In the remainder of this article, we discussed scenarios 2 and 3 because they are more appropriate for the routine establishment of an HMB.

The average cost per liter of pasteurized donor milk at Da Nang HMB tends to be lower than that in other countries

The cost per liter of pasteurized DHM ready to be used (i.e., passed both pre- and post-pasteurization tests) over 6.5 years in our study was USD 116 (scenario 2) and USD 74 (scenario 3), corresponding to an overall milk disposal rate of approximately 15%. The cost per liter of DHM varies across countries and HMB [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37], from the lowest of 41.4 USD in an HMB in China [37] to 370 USD in an HMB in the UK [34]. In the UK, the estimated cost of 1 L of DHM was reported to be approximately GBP 150–290 or USD 191–370 in a position paper that did not specify the sources of information [34]. The unit cost in our study was higher than that reported in a study in China, which was just USD 41 per liter [37]. Several possible reasons may account for this difference, including 1) our HMB has a longer period of operation (eight years), 2) most donors are not required to repeat the needed tests when donating within six months of their serological test, and 3) raw DHM from all mothers on the same day is brought to pasteurization [37]. In contrast, Da Nang HMB pools raw DHM from each donor, thus needing to store raw milk until the volume reaches approximately eight liters or more. This practice requires more funds to buy freezers, allocate space for them, and allocate resources for running and operating [9].

However, due to potential variations in operating procedures and costing methodologies, the findings might not be readily comparable. HMBs in Norway have a cost of USD 100 per liter; however, they use raw milk and primarily serve newborns at the same hospital, which can reduce the cost of establishing and operating an HMB [33]. In Spain, a study compared high-temperature short-time (HTST) pasteurization (72-75 °C, 15 s) and traditional Holder Pasteurization (HoP) (62 °C, 30 min) for donor milk. Despite the high initial equipment investment required for HTST pasteurization, this process leads to a substantial long-term reduction in production costs [31].

Staffing remains the main cost

In this study, we found that staffing remains the main monthly cost: almost 70% of implementation costs and 60% when start-up costs are included. The cost was higher than that reported in other studies applying similar methodologies: 33% in China, 40% in Italy, and 51% in Germany [30, 32, 36]. The study collected information about task distribution in the first seven months of HMB, when operations and staff performance might not be the most efficient. In addition, the issues relating to the high disposal rate of milk would surely require additional efforts for investigation, discussion, and solution development. Moreover, the staff of Da Nang HMB play various roles, including clinical roles, while non-HMB staff clinicians and nurses also provide support to HMB (e.g., donor recruitment, education, and feeding of newborns). It is possible that our study misclassified the costs related to personnel incorrectly. Nonetheless, we believe that the personnel cost could be lower if it is measured later in the implementation stage.

Unit costs vary with time

In this study, we found that the cost was greater in the initial period. The disposal rate was high (up to almost 50%), leading to a high volume of DHM that could not be used, which increased the unit cost. Additionally, we observed that pasteurization of only 84% of the raw DHM occurred within the first six months. Da Nang HMB might need to wait until the volume reaches at least 8 L before pasteurization, delaying the process and resulting in a lower volume of pasteurized DHM and thus a higher unit cost. In subsequent years, the cost decreased due to the lower disposal rate (less than 15%). Starting in the second year, the Da Nang HMB also began recruiting more donors from the community who contributed larger volumes of breastmilk for an extended duration [12], resulting in a lower disposal rate [38] and helping to reduce costs.

However, we identified two periods when unit costs increased, regardless of the disposal rate. The first peak occurred between August 2020 and January 2021 and was linked to the COVID-19 pandemic and included travel restrictions, fear of transmission, hesitancy to contact others, and limitations on hospital visits unless necessary. At times, DNHWC was quarantined due to suspected COVID-19, leading to a decreased supply of DHM and reduced use of pasteurized DHM. The second peak in unit cost occurred from February 2022 to January 2023, corresponding to a period in which the percentage of raw DHM pasteurized dropped due to the high volume of pasteurized DHM at the HMB in August 2021-July 2022 (approximately 300-350 L) compared to approximately 200 L or less after July 2022. Additionally, there was a decrease in the volume of raw DHM. Due to challenges in procurement, the hospital could not perform all four screening tests for donors (HIV, HBV, HCV, and syphilis) simultaneously, resulting in the inability to recruit certain potential donors.

The change in unit cost over time suggests that new HMBs might need 6-12 months to optimize their operation. Our findings also propose that a high volume of raw DHM received, a low disposal rate, and a high usage of pasteurized donor milk would lower the unit cost. Therefore, instead of having multiple HMBs, having HMB satellites would be a more cost-effective investment. The satellites collect raw DHM and send it to the HMB for processing, receiving pasteurized DHM for their newborns in need. This helps reduce the cost of establishing an HMB.

Scaling up of the HMB model in Vietnam

For the effective replication of this model to serve multiple regions in Vietnam (i.e., reducing the cost of DHM), four additional HMBs and two HMB satellites have been established based on national expertise. Core staff from the established HMBs support facility assessments and capacity building for newer HMBs. Using the Resource Toolkit for Establishing and Integrating Human Milk Bank Programs [7] and drawing on 100 years of international learning in processing and providing DHM through HMBs [8], Vietnam has developed its own HMB guidelines [39] for future scaling up of HMB networks. Furthermore, an HMB network in the East Asia Pacific has been established to facilitate knowledge sharing among countries in the region. An HMB standard for the East Asia Pacific was issued with the contributions of all member states [40]. National HMB experts from the network also participate in the development of global guidance on HMB.

This study has several limitations. This approach utilizes the establishment cost of the first HMB, whose components might be essential for other HMBs (e.g., scenario 1). As mentioned earlier, the inclusion of three scenarios addresses various needs of HMB establishment. Additionally, costs will vary depending on operational procedures, which might differ across HMBs. Implementation costs are based on the first seven months of operation, which might differ from subsequent phases that could be more efficient (e.g., requiring less effort from staff and having better operational procedures).

Conclusion

This study offers a comprehensive estimation of financing for the first HMB in Vietnam. While the cost of DHM in this study is comparable to that of certain neighboring countries, it is considered high in comparison to that of other HMBs with a long duration of operation since its establishment. Measures aimed at achieving better quality control, minimizing the loss of DHM volume, and motivating more community-based donors to contribute breastmilk to the HMB, as opposed to relying solely on hospital donors, should be intentionally implemented. These efforts are crucial for reducing costs and ensuring that access to this service is not available or sufficient for eligible small vulnerable infants whose mothers’ breastmilk is not available.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable. An Excel file for the costing estimation will be available from the corresponding author upon request.

Abbreviations

ABC-I:

Activity-based costing ingredients

DHM:

Donor human milk

DNHWC:

Da Nang Hospital for Women and Children

HMB:

Human milk bank

NEC:

Necrotizing enterocolitis

References

  1. WHO. WHO recommendations for care of the preterm or low-birth-weight infant. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  2. WHO. Infant and young child feeding. Geneva: WHO. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding . Accessed 6 Jan 2024.

  3. Walters DD, Phan LTH, Mathisen R. The cost of not breastfeeding: global results from a new tool. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34(6):407–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith JP, Iellamo A, Nguyen TT, Mathisen R. The volume and monetary value of human milk produced by the world’s breastfeeding mothers: results from a new tool. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1152659.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith JP, Borg B, Iellamo A, Nguyen TT, Mathisen R. Innovative financing for a gender-equitable first-food system to mitigate greenhouse gas impacts of commercial milk formula: investing in breastfeeding as a carbon offset. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2023;7:1155279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. WHO. Guidelines on optimal feeding of low birth-weight infants in low-and middle-income countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  7. PATH. Strengthening human milk banking: A resource toolkit for establishing and integrating human milk bank programs − a global implementation framework. Seattle: PATH; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tran HT, Nguyen TT, Mathisen R. The use of human donor milk. BMJ. 2020;371:m4243.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mansen K, Nguyen TT, Nguyen NQ, Do CT, Tran HT, Nguyen NT, Mathisen R, Nguyen VD, Ngo YTK, Israel-Ballard K. Strengthening newborn nutrition through establishment of the first human milk bank in Vietnam. J Hum Lact. 2021;37(1):76–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamdan MA, Gaeta ML. reotide and low-fat breast milk in postoperative chylothorax. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(6):2215–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Medoff-Cooper B, Naim M, Torowicz D, Mott A. Feeding, growth, and nutrition in children with congenitally malformed hearts. Cardiol Young. 2010;20 Suppl 3:149–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tran HT, Nguyen TT, Barnett D, Weaver G, Nguyen OTX, Van Ngo Q, Le HTT, Huynh LT, Do CT, Mathisen R. Trends and dynamics in the first four years of operation of the first human milk bank in Vietnam. Nutrients. 2021;13(4):1185097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tran HT, Nguyen TT, Giang HTN, Huynh LT, Barnett D, Mathisen R, Murray JCS. Factors associated with the use of pasteurized donor milk for healthy newborns: experience from the first human milk bank in Vietnam. Nutrients. 2021;13(4): 1151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rollins N, Piwoz E, Baker P, Kingston G, Mabaso KM, McCoy D, Ribeiro Neves PA, Perez-Escamilla R, Richter L, Russ K, et al. keting of commercial milk formula: a system to capture parents, communities, science, and policy. Lancet. 2023;401(10375):486–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen TT, Withers M, Hajeebhoy N, Frongillo EA. Infant formula feeding at birth is common and inversely associated with subsequent breastfeeding behavior in Vietnam. J Nutr. 2016;146(10):2102–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Vietnam General Statistics Office, UNICEF. The Viet Nam multiple indicator cluster survey 2014. Hanoi: Vietnam General Statistics Office; 2015.

  17. Nguyen TT, Cashin J, Tran HT, Hoang TA, Mathisen R, Weissman A, Murray JCS. Birth and newborn care policies and practices limit breastfeeding at maternity facilities in Vietnam. Front Nutr. 2022;9:1041065.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Tran HT, Murray JCS, Sobel HL, Mannava P, Huynh LT, Nguyen PTT, Giang HTN, Le TTM, Hoang TA, Nguyen VD, et al. Early essential newborn care is associated with improved newborn outcomes following caesarean section births in a tertiary hospital in Da Nang, Vietnam: a pre/post-intervention study. BMJ Open Qual. 2021;10(3):e001089.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Z, Mannava P, Murray JCS, Sobel HL, Jatobatu A, Calibo A, Tsevelmaa B, Saysanasongkham B, Ogaoga D, Waramin EJ, et al. Association between early essential newborn care and breastfeeding outcomes in eight countries in Asia and the Pacific: a cross-sectional observational -study. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(8):e002581.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen TT, Tran HTT, Cashin J, Nguyen VDC, Weissman A, Nguyen TT, Kelly B, Mathisen R. Implementation of the code of marketing of breast-milk substitutes in Vietnam: marketing practices by the industry and perceptions of caregivers and health workers. Nutrients. 2021;13(8):2884.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Tran HT, Nguyen TT, Nguyen OTX, Barnett D, Weaver G, Mathisen R. Characteristics and factors influencing the volume of breastmilk donated by women to the first human milk bank in Vietnam. Front Glob Womens Health. 2023;4:1185097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Waters H, Abdallah H, Santillan D. Application of activity-based costing (ABC) for a Peruvian NGO healthcare provider. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2001;16(1):3–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Waters HR, Penny ME, Creed-Kanashiro HM, Robert RC, Narro R, Willis J, Caulfield LE, Black RE. The cost-effectiveness of a child nutrition education programme in Peru. Health Policy Plan. 2006;21(4):257–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Drummond MF, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Creese A, Parker D. Cost analysis in primary healthcare: a training manual for programme managers. England: WHO; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Johns B, Baltussen R, Hutubessy R. Programme costs in the economic evaluation of health interventions. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2003;1(1):1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. The State Bank of Vietnam. Exchange rate. Hanoi: The State Bank of Vietnam. Available: https://www.sbv.gov.vn/. Accessed 15 Feb 2024.

  28. Cashin-Garbutt A. Breast milk banks: an interview with Dr. Pieter Koorts. Sydney. Available: http://www.news-medical.net/news/20121205/Breast-milk-banks-an-interview-with-Dr-Pieter-Koorts.aspx. Accessed 15 June 2023.

  29. Chang FY, Cheng SW, Wu TZ, Fang LJ. Characteristics of the first human milk bank in Taiwan. Pediatr Neonatol. 2013;54(1):28–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Daili C, Kunkun Z, Guangjun Y. Cost analysis of operating a human milk bank in China. J Hum Lact. 2020;36(2):264–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Escuder Vieco D, Arenas Vidal J, Rojas García P, Gónzález MJ, García Lara NR, Pallás Alonso CR. Comparative analyses of holder pasteurization vs. HTST pasteurization for donor milk: a cost-minimization study applicable to human milk banks. Int Breastfeed J. 2023;18(1):20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Fengler J, Heckmann M, Lange A, Kramer A, Flessa S. Cost analysis showed that feeding preterm infants with donor human milk was significantly more expensive than mother’s milk or formula. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109(5):959–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Grovslien AH, Gronn M. Donor milk banking and breastfeeding in Norway. J Hum Lact. 2009;25(2):206–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hoodbhoy S. Human milk banking; current evidence and future challenges. Paediatr Child Health. 2013;23(8):337–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jegier BJ, Johnson TJ, Engstrom JL, Patel AL, Loera F, Meier P. The institutional cost of acquiring 100 mL of human milk for very low birth weight infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Hum Lact. 2013;29(3):390–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Salvatori G, De Rose DU, Clemente M, Gentili C, Verardi GP, Amadio P, Reposi MP, Bagolan P, Dotta A. How much does a liter of donor human milk cost? Cost analysis of operating a human milk bank in Italy. Int Breastfeed J. 2022;17(1):90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Xiaoshan H, Xue C, Jun Z, Feng L, Xiaohui C, Zhangbin Y, Shuping H. Eight-year operation status and data analysis of the first human milk bank in East China. Int Breastfeed J. 2022;17(1):65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Tran HT, Nguyen TT, Nguyen OTX, Huynh LT, Nguyen LT, Nguyen TT, Le HTT, Barnett D, Weaver G, Mathisen R. Differences in the microbiological profile of raw and pasteurized breastmilk from hospital and community-based donors at the first human milk bank in Vietnam. Nutrients. 2023;15(2):412.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Vietnam Ministry of Health. Decision 2394/QĐ-BYT: Approval of The technical guideline for establishing and operating Human Milk Banks. Hanoi: Vietnam Ministry of Health; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Human Milk Banking Network in Southeast Asia. Minimum standards for the establishment and operation of human milk banks in Southeast Asia. Hanoi: Human Milk Banking Network in Southeast Asia; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to Kimberly Mansen, Kiersten Israel-Ballard, Nga Q Nguyen, and Nga T Nguyen from PATH, and Chung T Do, formerly with FHI 360, for their contributions to the conceptualization and validation of initial findings. Special thanks to the financial staff at Alive & Thrive, PATH, and Da Nang Hospital for Women and Children for providing valuable information for the study. We also acknowledge the data contribution from an online monitoring system developed by Phuc Hai Dang Co., led by Khoa TN Tran. Our appreciation goes to Pam Sutton, the editor of Editorial and Communications at FHI 360, for her significant contribution to the internal review, which greatly enhanced this manuscript.

Institutional review board

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant Numbers OPP50838 and INV042392) and the Government of Ireland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, 11910, Vietnam

    Minh V. Hoang, Anh T. Tran, Toan Q. Luu & Mai Q. Vu

  2. Alive & Thrive, Global Nutrition, FHI 360, Hanoi, 11022, Vietnam

    Tuan T. Nguyen & Roger Mathisen

  3. Neonatal Unit and Human Milk Bank, Da Nang Hospital for Women and Children, Da Nang, 50506, Vietnam

    Hoang T. Tran & Oanh T. X. Nguyen

  4. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, The University of Da Nang, Da Nang, 50206, Vietnam

    Hoang T. Tran

Authors
  1. Minh V. Hoang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tuan T. Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anh T. Tran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Toan Q. Luu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mai Q. Vu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hoang T. Tran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Oanh T. X. Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Roger Mathisen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, M.V.H., T.T.N., A.T.T., R.M.; Methodology, M.V.H., T.T.N., A.T.T., M.Q.V., H.T.T.; Formal analysis, M.V.H., T.T.N., A.T.T., T.Q.L.; Validation, M.V.H., T.T.N., A.T.T., T.Q.L., H.T.T.; Investigation, A.T.T., M.Q.V., O.T.X.N.; Resources, R.M.; Data curation, A.T.T., M.Q.V.; Drafting the manuscript, M.V.H., T.T.N., A.T.T., T.Q.L.; Review and editing, M.V.H., T.T.N., A.T.T., T.Q.L., M.Q.V., H.T.T., O.T.X.N., R.M.; Visualization, M.V.H., T.T.N., A.T.T.; Supervision, M.V.H., T.T.N., H.T.T.; Project administration, M.V.H., T.T.N., R.M.; Funding acquisition, M.V.H., R.M.; All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tuan T. Nguyen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoang, M.V., Nguyen, T.T., Tran, A.T. et al. Cost analysis of establishing and operating the first human milk bank at Da Nang Hospital for Women and Children in Vietnam: an activity-based costing ingredients study. Int Breastfeed J 19, 47 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-024-00657-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-024-00657-6

Keywords

International Breastfeeding Journal

ISSN: 1746-4358