Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Effect of maternal country of birth on breastfeeding practices: results from Portuguese GXXI birth cohort

  • 1, 2Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1, 3 and
  • 1, 3
International Breastfeeding Journal201813:15

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-018-0157-x

  • Received: 8 September 2017
  • Accepted: 26 March 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Maternal country of birth has been associated with perinatal health outcomes but less is known regarding breastfeeding practices in contemporary European settings. This study investigated effect of maternal country of birth on breastfeeding initiation and duration by comparing native Portuguese and migrant mothers.

Methods

We analyzed data of 7065 children of the Generation XXI (GXXI) birth cohort recruited at birth (2005–06) and followed-up 4 years later. Logistic regression was used to assess the effect of maternal country of birth on breastfeeding initiation. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to compare breastfeeding duration by maternal country of birth and length of residence by migrant mothers in Portugal.

Results

Breastfeeding initiation and the type of breastfeeding practice were similar for native Portuguese and migrant mothers. The migrants had significantly higher median duration in months of any breastfeeding (Odds Ratio [OR] 6.0, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 5.4,6.6) and exclusive breastfeeding (OR 4.0, 95% CI 3.8,4.2) than native Portuguese mothers (OR 4.0, 95% CI 3.8,4.2 and OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.9,3.0). Migrant mothers who resided in Portugal for either ≤5 years (OR 5.0, 95% CI 3.9,6.1 and OR 4.0, 95% CI 3.8,4.2) or >  5 years (OR 6.0, 95% CI 5.5,6.5 and OR 4.0, 95% CI 3.7,4.3) years had similar duration of any breastfeeding or exclusive breastfeeding, in both cases higher than the native Portuguese mothers. No significant differences were found when world regions were compared.

Conclusions

Maternal country of birth does not influence breastfeeding initiation and type of feeding practice. However, migrant mothers have longer breastfeeding duration of either exclusive or any breastfeeding, which was not changed by length of residence in Portugal.

Keywords

  • Breastfeeding
  • Initiation
  • Duration
  • Maternal country of birth
  • Portugal

Background

Breastfeeding is a universally accepted means of optimal nutrition that promotes infant survival, growth and development [1, 2]. World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that infants be exclusively breastfed for the first 6 months of life with continued breastfeeding up to 2 years of age or beyond with adequate complementary feeds [3]. Breastfeeding is cost effective with life course benefits for mother and child [4]. Fundamentally, it has been established to have a positive effect on intelligence, to be protective against childhood infections and obesity, as well as decreasing risk of some non-communicable diseases in adulthood [4, 5].

Infant feeding practices are determined by sociodemographic factors including maternal country of birth [1]. However, this association is typified by mixed findings [1, 69]. There are results indicating that immigrants with high income are more likely to initiate and breastfeed for longer duration than native born mothers [1, 8, 9]. While in other studies lesser or comparable initiation and duration rates were observed irrespective of maternal country of birth [6, 7]. Although the association is not homogenous for all settings, “healthy immigrant effect” could be considered the basis for the disparity of breastfeeding behaviour in migrant and native born mothers [10]. Comparing breastfeeding duration between emigrants and mothers in their home country also suggests a “healthy migrant effect” because of the better indicators in the emigrants [11].

“Healthy immigrant effect” describes immigrants as having better health outcomes compared with native-born and non-migrant populations in countries of origin [10]. The relationship between the maternal country of birth and perinatal outcomes has been well documented, but few regarding breastfeeding [4, 12, 13]. Even fewer studies addressed the effect of duration of residence by migrants in the host country on breastfeeding in European settings [14, 15]. In international terms, the share of immigrants particularly from contemporary conflict zones in total population in Portugal is relatively low. The national statistics shows that the immigration flows into the country, which accelerated in the last three decades is mainly linked with employment opportunities, and females constituted a slightly greater proportion of the immigrant population [16, 17]. Therefore, this study investigated breastfeeding initiation and duration in a birth cohort comparing Portuguese and migrant mothers. Additionally, we examined the effect of time since migration to Portugal on breastfeeding practices. We hypothesized that migrant mothers would have greater proportions of breastfeeding initiation and longer duration.

Methods

Study setting and context

Generation XXI (GXXI) is a population-based prospective birth cohort that initially enrolled a total of 8647 newborns between April 2005 and August 2006 from all five public maternity units of the metropolitan area of Porto, Portugal [18]. Information was collected on maternal demographic and obstetric characteristics, as well as parental lifestyle (e.g. diet, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity) during the pregnancy and in the early period of baby’s life. Data on a wide range of pregnancy outcomes and information on child health were also obtained. Exposure and outcome data were collected directly from participants by questionnaires, interviews and clinical assessments [18]. Details of the methods including data collection tools and processes are also found in the project Generation XXI website [19].

In this study, we analyzed data from the Generation XXI obtained at birth and 4 years follow-up evaluation [20]. Four years after birth, the total cohort was invited for reevaluation between April 2009 and July 2011.Trained interviewers administered a structured questionnaire concerning maternal health, which included breastfeeding experience. In this study, only children with data on breastfeeding practices obtained at the 4 years evaluation and maternal country of birth (Portuguese, non-Portuguese Europeans, South Americans and Africans) were included. We excluded migrants from any other regions (n = 6) and twins (n = 296). The final sample included 7065 participants (Additional file 1). Characteristics of participants and non-participants regarding maternal sociodemographic characteristics at birth are presented in Additional file 2.

Measurements

Outcome measures

Type of breastfeeding practices was defined in three categories: exclusive formula when the child never received breast milk; exclusive breastfeeding when the child was only fed with breast milk, and it was considered until formula or another type of foods and beverages were introduced and breastfeeding stopped; and mixed if combined breast milk with formula or other type of foods any time (i.e., concurrently since birth or when the child was exclusively breastfed for a period of time and then formula or another type of foods were introduced to supplement breastfeeding). Any breastfeeding was considered if the child ever received breast milk, regardless if it was exclusive or mixed, categorized as “Yes” (ever breastfed) or “No” (never breastfed). Breastfeeding duration indicated how long the child was exclusively breastfed and also for how long the child was breastfed in total (any type of breastfeeding). Duration of breastfeeding was recorded in weeks and categorized in months. The total duration of breastfeeding was categorized in six groups: never breastfed (0 months), breastfed during < 1 month, breastfed between 1.0 and 2.9 months, between 3.0 and 5.9 months, between 6.0 and 11.9 months, and breastfed for or more than 12 months. These cut-off points were based on WHO recommendations [3]. For exclusive breastfeeding duration we created 5 groups: never exclusively breastfed, breastfed during < 1, exclusively breastfed between 1.0 and 2.9 months, between 3.0 and 5.9 months, and those exclusively breastfed for ≥6.0 months.

Exposure measure

A woman was classified as migrant if (a) she was born abroad and both parents were foreign born or (b) she was born abroad and one or both parents were Portuguese born and she moved to Portugal at the age of 18 or later. Otherwise, the participant was considered Portuguese [21]. Time since migration to Portugal was used as a proxy for measuring acculturation and social integration into Portuguese society. We adopted and adapted published classification and assessed the level of acculturation by time since migration to Portugal measured as completed years from arrival to delivery. For analysis we classified duration as ≤5 or >  5 years duration groups as previously done [22].

Covariates

Potential confounders considered in analysis included maternal and child specific factors measured at birth: maternal age (< 20, 20–34 and ≥ 35 years), education (basic, secondary or tertiary), employment (employed or unemployed) and household income classified based on euros (€)/month as ≤1000 (low), 1001–1500 (medium) and >  1500 (high), parity (primiparae or multiparae), maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI < 25, underweight/normal weight or ≥ 25 kg/m2, overweight/obese), smoking during pregnancy (smoking or not), number of prenatal visits (≤ 6 prenatal visits or >  6 prenatal visits), gestational age at birth (< 32, 32–36, 37–41 and ≥ 42 weeks), mode of delivery (vaginal or caesarian section). Infants were classified as preterm if delivered at < 37 completed weeks, and low birthweight was defined as babies with birthweight less than 2500 g. While small for gestational age (SGA) babies were classified as those with birthweight below the 10th percentile for the gestational age and sex.

Statistical analysis

Sociodemographic, obstetric and infant as well as breastfeeding characteristics were described by maternal country of birth (Portugal, other European countries, South American and African). Proportions were compared using the Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. For immigrant mothers, we also described their length of residence in Portugal (≤ 5 vs. > 5 years) and age on arrival (< 18 or ≥ 18 years). We compared breastfeeding practices for exclusive and any breastfeeding. Median duration of exclusive or any breastfeeding were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. Analyses of any breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding duration (continuous variable) excluded never breastfed and outlier observations (exclusive breastfeeding > 36 weeks and for any breastfeeding > 180 weeks).

Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the effect of maternal country of birth (Portuguese vs. migrants) on breastfeeding initiation (any or exclusive categorized as “Yes” or “No”) expressed as OR (95% CI). Multiple regression analysis was performed to adjust for age, education, household income, parity, pre-pregnancy BMI, number of prenatal visits, smoking during pregnancy, mode of delivery, gestational age, birthweight and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission. In all the models, native Portuguese was considered as reference category for comparison with other Europeans, South Americans and Africans. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to compare breastfeeding duration by maternal country of birth and length of residence by migrant mothers in Portugal. The log-rank test was used to compare median breastfeeding duration (95% CI) of Portuguese and migrants mothers. A p - value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 23.0 (IBM Corp., New York, USA).

Results

Participants consisted of native Portuguese (6831, 96.7%), other Europeans (61, 0.9%), South Americans (106, 1.5%) and Africans (67, 0.9%) (Table 1). There is variation in some observed characteristics of foreign and native born mothers. The majority (80.2%) of South Americans had resided for ≤5 years in Portugal as compared to 39.3 and 29.9% of other Europeans and Africans. The proportion of migrants that arrived in Portugal after ≥18 years of age was: other Europeans (93.4%), South Americans (97.2%) and Africans (70.1%). Mothers aged ≥35 years were around one third among Africans (31.3%) but lower percentages for South Americans (14.2%), other Europeans (8.2%) and native Portuguese (17.1%). Only 21.4% of Portuguese mothers and from 17.9 to 39.3% of migrants were tertiary educated. The proportion of households earning 1000 euros or less per month were 38.4% for native Portuguese, 24.5% for other Europeans, 52.3% for South Americans and 42.1% for Africans. The proportion of primiparous mothers was 57.5% (native Portuguese), 73.8% (other Europeans), 62.5% (South Americans) and 48.8% (Africans). More than 80% of mothers attended > 6 prenatal visits irrespective of their country of birth. Caesarean section rates were 35.9% (native Portuguese), 33.3% (other Europeans), 51.9% (South Americans) and 37.9% (Africans). Low birthweight prevalence was 7.1% (native Portuguese), 3.3% (other Europeans), 3.8% (South Americans) and 4.5% (Africans). Preterm birth and NICU admission proportions were respectively 7.2 and 8.7% for native Portuguese, 6.6 and 19.3% for other Europeans, 4.7 and 4.0% for South Americans, 9.0 and 6.1% for Africans.
Table 1

Sociodemographic, obstetric, infant and breastfeeding characteristics by maternal country of birth

Characteristic, n (%)

Portuguese

European

South American

African

p - value

Median length of maternal residence in Portugal (Years)

 

7.0

3.0

10.5

<  0.05

 ≤ 5 years

 

24 (39.3)

85 (80.2)

20 (29.9)

<  0.05

 > 5 years

 

37 (60.7)

21 (19.8)

47 (70.1)

 

Age at arrival in Portugal

 <  18 years

 

4 (6.6)

3 (2.8)

20 (29.9)

<  0.05

 ≥ 18 years

 

57 (93.4)

103 (97.2)

47 (70.1)

 

Maternal age at birth (years)

 <  20

330 (4.8)

2 (3.3)

1 (1.0)

0 (0.0)

<  0.05

 20–34

5330 (78.0)

54 (88.5)

90 (84.9)

46 (68.7)

 

 ≥ 35

1171 (17.1)

5 (8.2)

15 (14.2)

21 (31.3)

 

Marital status

 Married/committed

6418 (94.0)

59 (98.3)

100 (94.3)

60 (89.6)

0.428

 Single

405 (6.0)

1 (1.7)

6 (5.7)

7 (10.4)

 

Maternal education

 Basic

3287 (48.1)

6 (9.8)

16 (15.1)

18 (26.9)

<  0.05

 Secondary

2081 (30.5)

31 (50.8)

71 (67.0)

29 (43.3)

 

 Tertiary

1463 (21.4)

24 (39.3)

19 (17.9)

20 (29.9)

 

Maternal occupation

 Employed

5354 (79.1)

50 (82.0)

74 (69.8)

47 (71.2)

0.076

 Unemployed

1413 (20.9)

11 (18.0)

30 (30.2)

19 (28.8)

 

Household income (euros/month)

 ≤ 1000

2289 (38.4)

13 (24.5)

46 (52.3)

24 (42.1)

<  0.05

 1001–1500

1776 (29.9)

18 (34.0)

17 (19.3)

10 (17.5)

 

 >  1500

1894 (31.8)

22 (41.5)

25 (28.4)

23 (40.4)

 

Primiparae

3866 (57.5)

45 (73.8)

65 (62.5)

30 (48.8)

<  0.05

Overweight/Obese

2042 (29.9)

10 (16.4)

27 (25.5)

14 (20.9)

 

>  6 prenatal visits

5848 (89.8)

51 (86.4)

84 (84.0)

53 (84.1)

0.096

Maternal smoking during pregnancy

1512 (22.1)

17 (27.9)

16 (15.1)

8 (11.9)

<  0.05

Caesarean section delivery

2445 (35.9)

20 (33.3)

54 (51.9)

25 (37.9)

<  0.05

Infant’s sex (male)

3346 (49.0)

26 (42.6)

55 (51.9)

34 (50.7)

0.702

Preterm infant

493 (7.2)

4 (6.6)

5 (4.7)

6 (9.0)

0.721

Low birthweight infant

484 (7.1)

2 (3.3)

4 (3.8)

3 (4.5)

0.242

Small for gestational age infant

1006 (14.7)

6 (9.8)

11 (10.4)

4 (6.0)

0.081

NICU Admission

442 (8.7)

9 (19.3)

3 (4.0)

3 (6.1)

<  0.05

Type of breastfeeding practices

 Exclusive formula

446 (7.4)

2 (3.9)

6 (6.4)

3 (5.1)

0.841

 Exclusive breastfeeding

1353 (22.4)

12 (23.5)

21 (22.3)

10 (16.9)

 

 Mixed feeding

4232 (70.2)

37 (72.5)

67 (71.3)

46 (78.0)

 

Duration of exclusive breastfeeding in months

 <  1 month

965 (17.6)

6 (12.5)

8 (9.6)

4 (7.5)

<  0.05

 1.0–2.9 months

1354 (24.7)

8 (16.7)

16 (19.0)

11 (20.4)

<  0.05

 3.0–5.9 months

2258 (41.2)

25 (52.1)

37 (44.0)

21 (38.9)

 

 ≥ 6.0 months

902 (16.6)

9 (18.8)

23 (27.4)

18 (33.3)

 

Total duration of any breastfeeding in months

 <  1 month

497 (5.8)

3 (7.9)

4 (5.9)

2 (4.2)

<  0.05

 1.0–2.9 months

740 (16.6)

2 (5.3)

6 (8.8)

3 (6.3)

 

 3.0–5.9 months

867 (19.4)

8 (21.1)

11 (16.4)

7 (14.6)

 

 6.0–11.9 months

1309 (29.3)

13 (34.2)

29 (42.6)

11 (22.9)

 

 ≥ 12 months

1157 (25.9)

12 (31.6)

18 (26.5)

25 (52.1)

 

P-values are for comparisons of all categories; Some variables contain missing values or excluded outliers (calculation of median duration of exclusive or any breastfeeding)

Prevalence of breastfeeding initiation and duration

Comparing mothers according to maternal country of birth we observed similarity in their breastfeeding options, considering exclusive formula, exclusive breastfeeding and mixed feeding (Table 1): native Portuguese (7.4, 22.4 and 70.2%), other Europeans (3.9, 23.5 and 72.5%), South Americans (6.4, 22.3 and 71.3%) and Africans (5.1, 16.9 and 78.0%) respectively.

The median duration of any breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding was significantly higher for migrant mothers compared to native Portuguese (24.0 and 12.0 weeks), other Europeans (34.0 and 16.0 weeks), South Americans (32.0 and 16.0 weeks) and Africans (50.6 and 16.0 weeks). The proportion of migrant mothers that exclusively breastfed for ≥6.0 months were significantly higher: 16.6% of native Portuguese, 18.8% of other Europeans, 27.4% of South Americans and 33.3% of Africans. Prevalence of any breastfeeding for ≥12 months was 25.9% for native Portuguese, 31.6% for other Europeans, 26.5% for South Americans and 52.1% for Africans.

Effect of maternal country of birth on breastfeeding initiation and duration

Maternal country of birth was not found to be associated with initiation of any breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding (Table 2). Using native Portuguese as the reference category, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and 95% Confidence Interval) for any breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding were as follows for the various categories of migrants: other Europeans (AOR 0.5, 95% CI 1.9,2.8 and AOR 1.1, 95% CI 0.5,2.2), South Americans (AOR 1.9 95% CI 0.5,7.9) and Africans (AOR 0.9, 95% CI 0.3,2.8 and AOR 1.1, 95% CI 0.5,2.2).
Table 2

Effect of maternal country of birth on breastfeeding initiation

 

Crude model

Adjusted model (95% CI)*

Any breastfeeding

 Portuguese

1

1

 Non-Portuguese European

0.6 (0.2,1.8)

0.6 (0.2,2.9)

 South American

2.2 (0.5,9.0)

1.9 (0.5,7.6)

 African

0.9 (0.3,3.2)

0.9 (0.3,2.9)

Exclusive breastfeeding

 Portuguese

1

1

 Non-Portuguese European

1.2 (0.6,2.4)

1.1 (0.5,2.3)

 South American

1.0 (0.6,1.8)

0.9 (0.5,1.7)

 African

1.2 (0.6,2.4)

1.1 (0.6,2.2)

Any breastfeeding is mixed feeding or exclusive breastfeeding

*Adjusted for age, education, household income, parity, BMI, number of prenatal visits, smoking in pregnancy, mode of delivery, gestational age, birthweight, and NICU admission

Migrant mothers have significantly higher duration in months of any breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding than the native Portuguese (Figs. 1 and 2). Portuguese (OR 4.0, 95% CI 3.8,4.2 and OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.9,3.0), migrants (OR 6.0, 95% CI 5.4,6.6 and OR 4.0, 95% CI 3.8,4.2). Migrant mothers who resided in Portugal for either ≤5 or > 5 years were also observed to have greater duration of any breastfeeding or exclusive breastfeeding compared with native Portuguese mothers (Figs. 3 and 4): migrants who resided ≤5 years (OR 5.0, 95% CI 3.9,6.1 and OR 4.0, 95% CI 3.8,4.2), and migrants who resided > 5 years (OR 6.0, 95% CI 5.5,6.5 and OR 4.0, 95% CI 3.7,4.3).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for duration of any breastfeeding according to maternal country of birth

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for duration of exclusive breastfeeding according to maternal immigration country of birth

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for duration of any breastfeeding by length of residence in Portugal by migrant mothers (≤5 or > 5 years) compared to native Portuguese mothers

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for duration of exclusive breastfeeding by length of residence in Portugal by migrant mothers (≤5 or > 5 years) compared to native Portuguese mothers

Discussion

This study assessed the effect of maternal country of birth on breastfeeding practices among mothers of a birth cohort recruited in Portugal. We observed that the native Portuguese and migrant mothers were similar in their marital status, occupation, number of prenatal visits and birth outcomes. However, there was variation in the distribution of maternal age, education, household income, parity and caesarean section. In our sampled population, the migrants had a higher proportion of tertiary educated mothers. A third of the African born mothers were ≥ 35 years, while the other migrant groups had a lower proportion of this age category compared with the Portuguese. Nevertheless, the proportion of those that initiated any and exclusive breastfeeding were similar for foreign and native born mothers. However, migrants have longer duration of any and exclusive breastfeeding. Furthermore, the length of residence in Portugal by migrant mothers does not negatively impact on the breastfeeding duration.

Breastfeeding could be dependent on the social context of study country or setting. In western developed societies there are evolving social and lifestyle factors that modify breastfeeding practices over time [23]. Substantial proportions of mothers participating in this study were employed and discontinue exclusive breastfeeding before the recommended 6 months duration. This is because maternal employment is known to significantly affect breastfeeding duration [24]. We observed a decline of exclusive breastfeeding at 4 months for both maternal categories, which coincides with the expiration of 4 months of full paid maternity leave according to Portuguese law. [25]

Our findings showed that migrant mothers irrespective of their length of residence in Portugal breastfed (any breastfeeding or exclusive breastfeeding) for longer periods than their native peers, which is contrary to the observation of some studies [15, 26, 27]. Specifically, the African-born women averagely had lengthier period of residence in Portugal but breastfeed for longer duration compared with other migrant mothers. This negates the notion that acculturating to host country could negatively influence migrant mother’s breastfeeding practices, especially those coming from settings with higher breastfeeding rates than Western nations [26]. Our observation is not unusual because acculturation has been reported as not having an influence on breastfeeding for particular migrant groups [7, 28]. Basically, certain traditional beliefs facilitate positive breastfeeding practices that persist for longer period especially in migrants from cultural backgrounds, which western breastfeeding practices was unknown or perceived as unacceptable [29]. On the contrary, it has been shown that post migration, immigrant breastfeeding rates tends to converge towards native born rates of breastfeeding as length of residence in host country increases [15].

An important public health implication of this study is that the duration of any breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding were below the WHO recommendations in native Portuguese and migrant mothers. Thus, we recommend intensive breastfeeding promotion for all maternal categories especially for the employed to whom adequate conditions to continue breastfeeding should be provided. Breastfeeding education during prenatal and postnatal care should be emphasized because of its effectiveness at enhancing breastfeeding initiation and duration [30]. In Portugal, there is universal healthcare for women irrespective of immigration status. This is relevant for immigrants because migration isolates women but health professionals could serve as a major source of information on breastfeeding [31]. More so for recently arrived migrant mothers arriving at a time characterized by multiple challenges to breastfeeding practices in contemporary European context. Finally, future research can improve the understanding of the exact role of maternal country of birth in breastfeeding. It is fundamental to explore acculturation pathway to explain healthy migrant effects by comparing breastfeeding practices in source countries with that of first and second generation migrant as well as native-born mothers.

Strengths and limitations

A major strength of the study is the comprehensive birth cohort data derived for the same mothers at birth and at 4 years evaluation. Even though, recall bias is a potential limitation, it has been reported that maternal recall of infant feeding practices is reliable even after 10 years [32]. The total sample size of this study is large but the proportion of migrants is comparably smaller, which we recognized as a limitation. This poses a challenge for external validity and generalization of findings. However, this was our finding in the study setting, regarding the proportion of migrants, as it was comparable to migrant categories in the contemporary national Portuguese birth registry at inception of the birth cohort. Contextually, the GXXI birth cohort represents 54.6% of all recorded births in greater Porto metropolitan area during recruitment period.

Even though we are unable to study the breastfeeding experience of migrants from some regions like Asia and North America, which were not represented in the study population, we explored migrant diversity by categorizing migrant mothers into three groups based on geographical regions that are predominantly represented in the north of Portugal (other Europeans, South Americans and Africans). We also categorized migrant mothers according to length of residence in Portugal, which is identified as proxy of acculturation in characterizing healthy migrant effect [15].

The data we used for this study has been previously validated. Information about feeding practices was collected from a sub sample of the study population at 6, 15 and 24 months, which was found to be reliable [33]. The analytical approach we employed was also robust in addressing the research question. We evaluated the effect of maternal country of birth on breastfeeding duration by Kaplan Meier survival analysis. This method is effective in estimating time to event (e.g. cessation of breastfeeding) and measuring the fraction of subjects breastfed for a certain amount of time after the initiation of breastfeeding [34]. Kaplan-Meier analysis allows estimation of survival over time, even when participants drop out or are studied for different lengths of time.

Conclusions

The study has shown that maternal country of birth influences breastfeeding duration but not its initation among mothers of Generation XXI birth cohort. Migrant mothers have longer duration of exclusive or any breastfeeding, which was not changed by length of residence in Portugal. The duration of breastfeeding is below recommended duration in both native and foreign-born mothers. We recommend intensive promotion of breastfeeding for all categories of mothers especially the employed to whom adequate condition to continue breastfeeding should be provided.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the families enrolled in Generation XXI for their kindness, members of the research team for their enthusiasm and perseverance and the participating hospitals and their staff for their help and support.

Funding

GXXI was funded by Programa Operacional de Saúde–Saúde XXI, Quadro Comunitário de Apoio III and Administração Regional de Saúde Norte (Regional Department of Ministry of Health). It has support from Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation and Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology. Precisely, EPIUnit-Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006862; Ref.UID/DTP/04750/2013); PhD Grant SFRH/BD/111794/2015 (Carina Rodrigues) as well as the individual grants IF/01060/2015 (Ana Cristina Santos) and SFRH/BSAB/113778/2015 (Henrique Barros), co-funded by the FCT and the POCH/FSE Program.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact author for data request.

Authors’ contributions

MK and HB conceived and designed the study and analysis. MK and HB collected data and prepared the datasets. MK, CR, MJF, ACS and HB analysed the data. MK drafted the manuscript. HB reviewed, edited and revised the manuscript as well as supervised all the processes. All authors interpreted data and revised the manuscript critically for intellectual content. Finally, all the authors read and approved the final version.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The project Generation XXI received ethical approval by the Ethical Committee of São João Hospital/ University of Porto Medical School and complies with the Helsinki Declaration and the current national legislation. The Portuguese Data Protection Authority also approved the study [20]. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants during baseline and subsequent follow up re-evaluations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
EPIUnit-Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas, 135, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal
(2)
Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaduna State University, Kaduna, Nigeria
(3)
Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal

References

  1. Tavoulari EF, Benetou V, Vlastarakos PV, Kreatsas G, Linos A. Immigrant status as important determinant of breastfeeding practice in southern Europe. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2015;23(1):39–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Martin CR, Ling PR, Blackburn GL. Review of infant feeding. Key features of breast milk and infant formula. Nutrients. 2016;8(5)Google Scholar
  3. World Health Organization. Infant and young child feeding. A tool for assessing national practices, policies and programmes. 2003. http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/inf_assess_nnpp_eng.pdf. Accessed 27 Dec 2017.
  4. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, Franca GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):475–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lechner BE, Vohr BR. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants fed human milk. A systematic review. Clin Perinatol. 2017;44(1):69–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Farchi S, Asole S, Chapin EM, Di Lallo D. Breastfeeding initiation rates among immigrant women in Central Italy between 2006 and 2011. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(2):344–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Busck-Rasmussen M, Villadsen SF, Norsker FN, Mortensen L, Andersen A-MN. Breastfeeding practices in relation to country of origin among women living in Denmark: a population-based study. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(10):2479–88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Rio I, Castello-Pastor A, Del Val Sandin-Vazquez M, Barona C, Jane M, Mas R, Rebagliato M, Bolumar F. Breastfeeding initiation in immigrant and non-immigrant women in Spain. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011;65(12):1345–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hawkins SS, Lamb K, Cole TJ, Law C. Influence of moving to the UK on maternal health behaviours: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2008;336(7652):1052–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Domnich A, Panatto D, Gasparini R, Amicizia D. The “healthy immigrant” effect: does it exist in Europe today? Italian J Public Health. 2012;9(3)Google Scholar
  11. Chen S, Binns CW, Zhao Y, Maycock B, Liu Y. Breastfeeding by Chinese mothers in Australia and China: the healthy migrant effect. J Hum Lact. 2013;29(2):246–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gagnon AJ, Zimbeck M, Zeitlin J, Alexander S, Blondel B, Buitendijk S, et al. Migration to western industrialised countries and perinatal health: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(6):934–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Neault NB, Frank DA, Merewood A, Philipp B, Levenson S, Cook JT, et al. Breastfeeding and health outcomes among citizen infants of immigrant mothers. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107(12):2077–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Barcelona de Mendoza V, Harville E, Theall K, Buekens P, Chasan-Taber L. Acculturation and intention to breastfeed among a population of predominantly Puerto Rican women. Birth. 2016;43(1):78–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nolan A, Layte R. The ‘healthy immigrant effect’: breastfeeding behaviour in Ireland. Eur J Pub Health. 2015;25(4):626–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Cabral S, Duarte C. Employment and wages of immigrants in Portugal https://www.bportugal.pt/sites/default/files/anexos/papers/wp201031.pdf. Accessed 27 Dec 2017.
  17. Interactive Map on Migration in Africa, the Middle-East and the Mediterranean Region (MTM i-Map). http://www.imap-migration.org/fileadmin/Editor/Profiles/MTM/MigDev/Portugal/Portugal_EN.pdf Accessed 27 Dec 2017.
  18. Larsen PS, Kamper-Jorgensen M, Adamson A, Barros H, Bonde JP, Brescianini S, et al. Pregnancy and birth cohort resources in europe: a large opportunity for aetiological child health research. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013;27(4):393–414.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Generation XXI website: http://www.geracao21.com . Accessed 27 Dec 2017.
  20. Alves E, Correia S, Barros H, Azevedo A. Prevalence of self-reported cardiovascular risk factors in Portuguese women: a survey after delivery. Int J Public Health. 2012;57(5):837–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Teixeira C, Correia S, Victora CG, Barros H. The Brazilian preference: cesarean delivery among immigrants in Portugal. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60168.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Urquia ML, Frank JW, Moineddin R, Glazier RH. Immigrants’ duration of residence and adverse birth outcomes: a population-based study. BJOG. 2010;117(I5):591–601.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Logan C, Zittel T, Striebel S, Reister F, Brenner H, Rothenbacher D, Genuneit J. Changing societal and lifestyle factors and breastfeeding patterns over time. Pediatrics. 2016;137(5)Google Scholar
  24. Hawkins SS, Griffiths LJ, Dezateux C, Law C. The impact of maternal employment on breast-feeding duration in the UK millennium cohort study. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10(9):891–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Santos SA, Macedo E. Belgian, Dutch, Lithuanian and Portuguese women have a say: countries’ social policies within Europe. Soc Work. 2010;9(2):23–31.Google Scholar
  26. Choudhry K, Wallace LM. Breast is not always best’. South Asian women’s experiences of infant feeding in the UK within an acculturation framework. Matern Child Nutr. 2012;8(1):72–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Harley K, Stamm NL, Eskenazi B. The effect of time in the U.S. on the duration of breastfeeding in women of Mexican descent. Matern Child Health J. 2007;11(2):119–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Kimbro RT, Lynch SM, McLanahan S. The influence of acculturation on breastfeeding initiation and duration for Mexican-Americans. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2008;27(2):183–99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Choudhry UK. Traditional practices of women from India: pregnancy, childbirth, and newborn care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1997;26(5):533–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wouk K, Tully KP, Labbok MH. Systematic review of evidence for baby-friendly hospital initiative step 3. J Hum Lact. 2017;33(1):50–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McFadden A, Atkin K, Renfrew MJ. The impact of transnational migration on intergenerational transmission of knowledge and practice related to breast feeding. Midwifery. 2014;30(4):439–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Zyl Z, Maslin K, Dean T, Blaauw R, Venter C. The accuracy of dietary recall of infant feeding and food allergen data. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2016;29(6):777–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pereira M. Determinantes sociais na escolha do local do parto e na duração do aleitamento materno na Geração XXI. Master of Public Health Thesis: Universidade du Porto; 2010. [Social determinants in the choice of place of birth and duration of breastfeeding in Generation XXI.]Google Scholar
  34. Etikan İ, Abubakar S, Alkassim R. The Kaplan-Meier estimate in survival analysis. Biom Biostatistics Int J. 2017;5(2):00128.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement