Open Access

Factors associated with prelacteal feeding in the rural population of northwest Ethiopia: a community cross-sectional study

  • Amare Tariku1Email author,
  • Gashaw Andargie Biks2,
  • Molla Mesele Wassie1,
  • Abebaw Gebeyehu3 and
  • Azeb Atinafu Getie1
International Breastfeeding Journal201611:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0074-9

Received: 18 December 2015

Accepted: 16 May 2016

Published: 25 May 2016

Abstract

Background

Prelacteal feeding has continued as a deep-rooted nutritional malpractice in developing countries. Prelacteal feeding is a barrier for implementation of optimal breastfeeding practices, and increases the risk of neonatal illness and mortality. However, its determinants are not well studied, which are essential to design intervention. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and determinants of prelacteal feeding among mothers with children aged 6–24 months in the rural population of northwest Ethiopia.

Methods

A community based cross-sectional study was conducted in Dabat Health and Demographic Surveillance System site, Dabat district, northwest Ethiopia from May 01 to June 29, 2015. Eight hundred and twenty-two mother-child pairs were included in the study. A pretested and structured questionnaire was used to collect data. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify the determinants of prelacteal feeding.

Results

In this community, about 26.8 % of children were given prelacteal feeds. The odds of prelacteal feeding was higher among mothers with a poor knowledge of Infant and Young Child Feeding (IYCF) (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] = 3.82; 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 2.42, 6.04), who gave birth at home (AOR = 3.74; 95 % CI 2.12, 6.60), and who were in the lowest wealth status (AOR = 2.11; 95 % CI 1.35, 3.31).

Conclusions

Prelacteal feeding was common in the study area, and significantly associated with a poor household wealth status, poor maternal knowledge of IYCF, and giving birth at home. Thus, emphasis should be given to improve mothers IYCF knowledge and utilization of institutional delivery. Moreover, special attention should be given to mothers with poor socio-economic status to reduce the practice of prelacteal feeding.

Keywords

Prelacteal feeding Home birth Poor knowledge of IYCF Poor wealth status Ethiopia

Background

Breastfeeding is unequalled way of providing ideal, natural, and renewable food for infant’s healthy growth and development [1, 2]. It provides immense immunologic, psychologic, social-economic, and environmental benefits [1, 3, 4]. Optimal breastfeeding significantly reduces a child’s risk of developing different infectious [58] and non-infectious inflammatory diseases [9, 10], obesity and related chronic non-communicable diseases [1114]. Furthermore, breastfeeding promotes a child’s cognitive development [15, 16]. Breastfeeding is considered a proven child survival strategy, and the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that, the newborns to be put on the breast within an hour after birth [1]. Early initiation of breastfeeding immediately after birth enhances mother-infant bonding [17], and creates an opportunity for the newborn to receive the nutritional and protective benefit of colostrum [3]. Moreover, it promotes effective suckling, successful establishment, and maintenance of breastfeeding throughout infancy [18].

However, in different countries including Ethiopia, a significant proportion of mothers offer prelacteal feeds to their newborn [1925]. Prelacteal feeding increases the risk of illness from acute respiratory tract infections [8] and diarrhea [26]. Similarly, it was associated with childhood stunting [27, 28]. Furthermore, prelacteal feeding was linked with poor breastfeeding outcomes, such as higher odds of delayed initiation [24], non-exclusive [29] and early cessation [30] of breastfeeding, and delayed ‘coming in’ of breast milk [19]. Delayed initiation of breastfeeding was noted to augment the risk of neonatal mortality [3133].

Globally, prelacteal feeding is practiced in many countries [34]; the highest rate in southeast and central Asia (54.6–93.9 %) [19, 21, 23, 24, 34] and at a modest rate in Latin America [30]. In Africa, most (10.8–75.2 %) of the mothers also offer prelacteal feeds to their newborn [20, 22, 34, 35]. In Ethiopia, about 27 % of newborns were given prelacteal feeds, and in Amhara region, the study area, half (47.8 %) of children received prelacteal feeds [27]. Though different factors were noted to affect prelacteal feeding practice, it was mainly related to maternal characteristics. Accordingly, poor household wealth status [21], older maternal age [24], maternal unemployment status, lack of education [21] and poor breastfeeding knowledge [22, 23] were associated with prelacteal feeding. The likelihood of prelacteal feeding was also higher among mothers who had no or incomplete antenatal visits [21, 36], gave birth at home [22], and delivered with cesarean section and episiotomy [23].

Since 2004, Ethiopia has implemented Infant and Young Child Feeding (IYCF) strategy as a key component of child survival strategy [37]. However, breastfeeding practice is suboptimal [27] and prelacteal feeding has been continued as a deep-rooted nutritional practice [22, 27, 38, 39]. In addition, the country has achieved a significant change in the reduction of child (under five years) mortality over the past fifteen years, but half of this mortality happened during the neonatal period [27]. Consequently, research showing the determinants of prelacteal feeding have vital importance in promoting implementation of IYCF, thereby reducing neonatal mortality. Nevertheless, literature showing the determinants of prelacteal feeding in Ethiopia, particularly northwest region are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to assess prevalence and determinants of prelacteal feeding among mothers with children aged 6–24 months in the rural population of northwest Ethiopia.

Methods

Study setting and design

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from May 01 to June 29, 2015 in Dabat Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) site which has been hosted by the University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. The site is located in the Dabat District in the northwest part of Ethiopia. The district has an estimated population size of 145,458 living in 26 rural and 4 urban kebeles (the smallest administration unit in Ethiopia). The livelihood of the residents by and large depends on subsistence farming. The district has six health centers and twenty-nine health posts. The HDSS covers thirteen randomly selected kebeles (three urban and ten rural kebeles) in different ecological zones (high land, middle land, and low land) and a total of 67,385 people were living in these kebeles. The Dabat HDSS site has been running since November 1996, and collects information on vital events like birth, death, migration, and pregnancy registrations and its outcome on quarterly bases.

Sample size and sampling procedure

Initially, the study was aimed to assess the nutritional status and feeding practice of children aged 6–59 months in Dabat HDSS site. Of the total thirteen kebeles in the HDSS, eight kebeles were selected using lottery method. Accordingly, all mothers with children aged 6–59 months who lived in the selected kebeles for at least six months were included in the study. For households with more than one study subject, only one was selected using lottery. Sample size was calculated using Epi-info version 3.7 by considering the following assumptions; the prevalence of prelacteal feeding in Amhara Region as 47.8 % [27], 95 % level of confidence, 5 % margin of error, and 5 % non-response rate. Thus, a minimum sample size of 804 was obtained. However, 822 children aged 6–24 months and fulfilling the eligibility criteria were found in the original survey. Therefore, to improve the power of the study all (822) children fulfilling the eligibility criteria were included in the study.

Data collection tools and procedure

Data were collected using structured, pretested, and interviewer administered questionnaire. To maintain consistency, the questionnaire was first translated from English to Amharic, the native language of the study area, and was retranslated back to English by professional translators and Public Health experts. Fourteen data collectors and three field supervisors (working in Dabat DHSS) were recruited for the study. Two days intensive training regarding the objective of the study, confidentiality of information, and techniques to conduct interview was given to data collectors and supervisors. The tool was pre-tested on 5 % of the total sample out of the study area. During pre-test, the acceptability and applicability of the procedures and tools were evaluated.

Operational definitions and study variables

Prelacteal feeding, the outcome variable, was understood as giving anything to drink other than breast milk in the first three days following delivery of the index child [40]. Accordingly, a mother was asked a key question to ascertain prelacteal feeding practice; ‘within the first three days of delivery, did you give any drink other than breast milk to the child’. If she responded “yes” it was coded ‘1’, otherwise coded ‘0’ as she didn’t give any prelacteal feed.

Mothers’ health care access was determined by asking the mother how many hours it took to reach the health care facilities. If she took less than two hours, it was considered as good health care access and was coded as “1”, otherwise “0” if she took two hours or more. Mothers’ knowledge of IYCF was assessed using nine questions. Mothers were asked about the benefit of breastfeeding, time to initiation of breastfeeding, colostrum feeding and it’s health benefit, how long an infant should exclusively breastfed, time to initiation of complementary feeding, type of food to start complementary feeding, how to feed a child, and for how long to continue on demand breastfeeding. The composite IYCF index was analyzed using Principal Component Analysis, and converted to terciles as lowest, medium, and highest. Likewise, the household wealth index was computed using a composite indicator for urban and rural residents by considering properties, like selected household assets and size of agricultural land. Principal Component Analysis was performed to categorize the household wealth index into lowest, middle, and highest.

Data analysis

Data were entered into the EPI INFO version 3.5.3 and exported to Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 for analysis. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies and proportions were used to summarize the variables. A binary logistic regression was used to investigate factors associated with prelacteal feeding. Variables with p-values of < 0.2 in the bivariable analysis were entered in to the multivariable analysis. The Adjusted Odds Ratio with a 95 % confidence interval was estimated to show the strength of association, and a p-value of < 0.05 was used to declare the statistical significance in the multivariable analysis.

Results

Socio-demographic and economic characteristics

Eight hundred twenty-two mother-child pairs were included for analysis. The mean (± SD) age of children was 17.25 (±7.27) months. In the study area, substantial proportion (94 % and 89.9 %, respectively) of mothers were Orthodox Christians and married. Nearly three-quarter (69.5 %) of mothers were uneducated and 58.8 % housewives. Nearly two-thirds (63 %) of children were living with family size of more than four (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-demographic and economic characteristics of study participants in the rural population of northwest Ethiopia, 2015

Variables

Frequency

Percent

Age of the child

  

 6–11 moths

239

29.1

 12–24 months

583

70.9

Sex of the child

  

 Male

410

49.9

 Female

412

50.1

Religion

  

 Orthodox

773

94.0

 Othera

49

6.0

Mothers age

  

 <35

507

61.7

 ≥35

315

38.3

Mothers education

  

 Uneducated

571

69.5

 Primary

109

13.3

 Secondary and above

142

17.3

Mothers employment

  

 Housewife

482

58.6

 Farmer

211

25.7

 Otherb

129

15.7

Mothers marital status

  

 Married

739

89.9

 Currently unmarriedc

83

10.1

Fathers education

  

 Uneducated

554

67.4

 Primary

143

17.4

 Secondary and above

125

15.2

Fathers employment

  

 Unemployed

46

5.6

 Farmer

431

52.4

 Other employmentd

345

42.0

Household size

  

 ≤4

304

37.0

 >4

518

63.0

Wealth status

  

 Poor

307

37.3

 Middle

246

29.9

 High

269

32.7

aMuslim, protestant and catholic, bstudents, unemployed, servant, own business, csingle, divorced and widowed, dmerchant, contract and permanent work

Maternal health care related characteristics

Nearly two-third (63 %) of mothers had antenatal visits for the index child, in which about 34.4 % had greater than or equal to four visits. More than three-fourth (75.9 %) of mothers gave birth at home, and more than half (56.7 %) of their delivery was attended by relatives and volunteers. Only one-fourth (25.8 %) of mothers received postnatal care (Table 2).
Table 2

Health care related characteristics of mothers in the rural population of northwest Ethiopia, 2015

Variables

Frequency

Percent

Antenatal care

  

 No

304

37.0

 Yes

518

63.0

Number of antenatal visits (n = 518)

  

 1

54

10.4

 2–3

286

55.2

 ≥4

178

34.4

Place of delivery

  

 Home

624

75.9

 Health facilities

198

24.1

Delivery attendant

  

 Health professionals

203

24.7

 Traditional birth attendant

153

18.6

 Relatives and volunteers

466

56.7

Postnatal care

  

 Yes

212

25.8

 No

610

74.2

Personnel providing postnatal care (n = 212)

  

 Health Extension Worker

177

84

 Other (CHWb and TBAa)

34

16.0

Time for postnatal care started (n = 212)

  

 Within an hour

14

6.6

 2–24 h

34

16

 25–48 h

29

13.7

 After 48 h

135

63.7

Mothers IYCFc knowledge

  

 Poor

272

33.1

 Medium

285

34.7

 High

268

32.2

Health care access

  

 Good access

607

73.8

 Poor access

215

26.2

aTraditional birth attendant, bCommunity Health Worker, cInfant and Young Child Feeding

Early neonatal feeding practices

In this community, 26.8 % (95 % CI 20.9, 32.7 %) of mothers gave prelacteal feeds to their newborn. The most common prelacteal foods given were raw butter (38.6 %) and plain water (24.5 %). Nearly three-fourths (74.1 %) of mothers practiced prelacteal feeding to maintain the tradition. More than half (52.9 %) of mothers discarded colostrum; most mothers (58.4 %) perceived that it isn’t good to give to the newborn (Table 3).
Table 3

Early neonatal feeding practice of children (6–24 months) in the rural population of northwest Ethiopia, 2015

Variables

Frequency

Percent

Prelacteal feed given

  

 Yes

220

26.8

 No

602

73.2

Type of prelacteal food given (n = 220)

  

 Raw butter

85

38.6

 Plain water

54

24.5

 Ershoa

21

9.6

 Sugar

26

11.8

 Cow milk

11

5.0

 Otherb

23

10.5

Reason for giving prelacteal food (n = 220)

  

 Tradition

163

74.1

 To prevent dehydration

20

9.1

 Otherc

37

16.8

Colostrum given to the child

  

 Yes

435

52.9

 No

387

47.1

Reason for discarding colostrum (n = 387)

  

 Not good for the child

226

58.4

 Otherd

161

41.6

aErsho is a traditional baking soda prepared by heating the flour and mixing it with distilled water, bfruit juice and formula milk, cenriched and easier to digest than first breast milk, dtradition, relatives influence, newborn feels thirsty, colostrum’s yellow and thick appearance

Factors associated with prelacteal feeding

In the bivariable analysis, the lowest wealth status, being a housewife and a farming mother, poor maternal educational status, poor father’s educational status, poor mother’s knowledge of IYCF, and giving birth at home were significantly associated with prelacteal feeding. However the result of multivariable analysis showed that three of these, being in the lowest wealth status, having poor knowledge of IYCF and giving birth at home were significantly and independently associated with prelacteal feeding. The odds of prelacteal feeding was 3.7 times (AOR = 3.74, 95 % CI 2.12, 6.60) higher among mothers who gave birth at home. Being in the lowest wealth status increases the odds of prelacteal feeding by 2 times (AOR = 2.11, 95 % CI 1.35, 3.31). Furthermore, the higher odds of prelacteal feeding was observed among mothers with poor (AOR = 3.82, 95 % CI 2.42, 6.04) and medium (AOR = 2.22, 95 % CI 1.40, 3.54) knowledge of IYCF compared to mothers with highest knowledge of IYCF (Table 4).
Table 4

Factors associated with prelacteal feeding practice among mothers with children (6–24 months) in the rural population of northwest Ethiopia, 2015

Variables

Prelacteal feeding

  
 

Yes n (%)

No n (%)

Crude Odds Ratio (95 % CI)

Adjusted Odds Ratio (95 % CI)

Mother’s marital status

    

 Currently married

203 (27.5)

536 (72.5)

1

 

 Currently unmarried

17 (20.5)

66 (79.5)

0.68 (0.39, 1.19)

1.09 (0.51, 2.33)

Mother’s education

    

 Uneducated

162 (28.4)

409 (71.6)

2.91 (1.70, 4.99)*

1.19 (0.59, 2.39)

 Primary

41 (37.6)

68 (62.4)

4.43 (2.34, 8.39)*

1.97 (0.92,4.25)

 Secondary and above

17 (12)

125 (88)

1

1

Mother’s employment

    

 Housewife

134 (27.8)

348 (72.2)

2.72 (1.56, 4.76)*

1.85 (0.94, 3.64)

 Farmer

70 (33.2)

141 (66.8)

3.51 (1.93, 6.37)*

1.39 (0.68, 2.84)

 Other

16 (12.4)

113 (87.6)

1

1

Father’s education

    

 Uneducated

144 (26)

410 (74)

3.03 (1.65, 5.54)*

1.15 (0.53, 2.51)

 Primary

63 (44.1)

80 (55.9)

6.785 (3.49, 13.16)*

3.26 (0.98, 7.32)

 Secondary and above

13 (10.4)

112 (89.6)

1

1

Mother’s knowledge of IYCFa

    

 Poor

102 (37.5)

170 (62.5)

3.28 (2.17, 4.96)*

3.82 (2.42, 6.04)*

 Medium

77 (27)

208 (73)

2.02 (1.32, 3.09)*

2.22 (1.39, 3.54)*

 High

41 (15.5)

224 (84.5)

1

1

Wealth status

    

 Poor

118 (38.4)

189 (61.6)

2.80 (1.91, 412)*

2.11 (1.35, 3.31)*

 Medium

53 (21.5)

193 (79.5)

1.23 (0.79, 190)

0.83 (0.50, 1.38)

 High

49 (18.2)

220 (81.8)

1

1

Mother’s age

    

 <35

124 (24.5)

383 (75.5)

1

1

 ≥35

96 (30.5)

219 (69.5)

1.35 (0.99, 1.85)

1.41 (0.98, 2.04)

Place of delivery

    

 Home

202 (32.4)

422 (67.6)

4.79 (2.87, 7.99)*

3.74 (2.12, 6.60)*

 Health facility

18 (9.1)

180 (90.9)

1

1

* p < 0.05, aInfant and Young Child Feeding

Discussion

This study revealed that, the prevalence of prelacteal feeding was 26.8 %. The finding was in agreement with the 2011 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey report of 27 % [27]. Slightly higher prelacteal feeding was reported in Raya Kobo district, Ethiopia at 38.8 % [22]. This is probably related to similarities in the lower maternal health care utilization, lower rate of an institutional delivery, and low maternal educational status in the study areas. The magnitude of prelacteal feeding was also high in some countries where most of the mothers were more educated, such as Egypt (57.8 %), Nigeria (70.6 %) [41] and Vietnam (73.3 %) [23]. This might be due to mothers perceived delay in breast milk production, insufficient milk production, and the perceived risk of dehydration and hypoglycemia to the newborns. Other studies also claimed that prelacteal feeding practice was associated with mothers’ unfavorable attitude towards it [42, 43]. However, behavioral change interventions have had a profound effect in reducing prelacteal feeding and other inappropriate breastfeeding practices and IYCF recommendations [20]. Thus, such evidence could further necessitate incorporating behavioral change and communication components in IYCF counseling and formal education curricula (health and medical education curricula).

The odds of prelacteal feeding were higher among mothers with poor and medium knowledge of IYCF as compared to their counterparts with a higher IYCF knowledge. The finding was supported by other study reports [22, 23]. Boosting a mothers knowledge of IYCF is cornerstone for implementing sustainable strategies to improve appropriate feeding practices [44].

In line with other study findings in Ethiopia [22, 27], this study also showed that, home birthing also increases prelacteal feeding. This is could be due to the fact that mothers who gave birth at home, were more likely to be exposed to the traditional beliefs that favor prelacteal feeding. In contrast, attending an institutional delivery would have an added benefit to receive immediate obstetric care, such as early initiation of breastfeeding which reduces the likelihood of giving prelacteal feeding [22]. However, other studies claimed that, giving birth through cesarean-section was associated with prelacteal feeding, where mainly formula milk was given until initiation of breastfeeding [23, 24, 45].

In this study, poor wealth status was strongly associated with prelacteal feeding. The parallel finding was reported by the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey report [27], in which the odds of prelacteal feeding declines with increasing the household wealth status. This could be related to the positive effect of wealth in improving mother’s health seeking behavior and the utilization of maternal health care services, which is the main service delivery point to promote clients awareness on IYCF. In Ethiopia, mothers in the lowest socio-economic status were less likely to have antenatal care and attend institutional delivery [27]. However, the finding is not in agreement with the study results elsewhere [21, 45]. The discrepancy may be attributed to the expensiveness of prelacteal food in the later study areas as compared to the current study area. Accordingly, being in the highest wealth status will enable people to purchase expensive formulae to feed their newborn prior to the initiation of breastfeeding compared with people in the lowest wealth status.

The study tried to show pertinent determinants of prelacteal feeding practice in the rural population of northwest Ethiopia by using an optimal sample size. However, the study is not free from some of the limitations. Though we have tried our best to maintain the quality of the data, there might be a chance of recall bias and information bias in ascertaining some of the variables, such as health care access and time to initiation of postnatal care.

Conclusions

In summary, prelacteal feeding was common in the study area, and significantly associated with poor household wealth status, poor maternal knowledge of IYCF, and giving birth at home. Thus, emphasis should be given to improve mothers’ IYCF knowledge and utilization of institutional delivery. Moreover, special attention should be given to mothers with poor socio-economic status to reduce prelacteal feeding practice.

Abbreviations

AOR: 

adjusted odds ratio

CI: 

confidence interval

COR: 

crude odds ratio

HDSS: 

Dabat Health and Demographic Surveillance System

IYCF: 

infant and young child feeding

SD: 

standard deviation

SPSS: 

statistical package for social sciences

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank mothers for their willingness to participate in the study. The authors’ appreciation will also go to the university of Gondar for provision of financial support as well as to Dabat DHSS site for their positive cooperation and providing materials.

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AT GAB AG MM ATG. Performed the experiments: GAB AT. Analyzed the data: AT GAB. Wrote the paper: AT GAB AG MM. Approved the proposal with some revisions: GAB AT AG MM ATG. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

No funding was obtained for this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Gondar. An official permission letter was secured from the Dabat DHSS site. All mothers were informed about the purpose of the study, and interview was held only with those who agreed to give verbal consent to participate. The right of a participant to withdraw from the study at any time, without any precondition was disclosed unequivocally. Moreover, the confidentiality of information was guaranteed by all data collectors and investigators by using code numbers rather than personal identifiers and by keeping the questionnaire locked.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Human Nutrition, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar
(2)
Department of Health Service Management and Heath Economics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar
(3)
Department of Reproductive and Child Health, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar

References

  1. WHO. Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding: A joint WHO/UNICEF statement. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.Google Scholar
  2. Black RE, Morris SS, Bryce J. Bellagio Child Survival Study Group. Where and why are 10 million children dying every year? Lancet. 2003;361:2226–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brownlee A. Breastfeeding, weaning & nutrition: the behavioral issues. Washington D.C.: International Health & Development Associates; 1990.Google Scholar
  4. Goldman AS. Modulation of the gastrointestinal tract of infants by human milk. interfaces and interactions. an evolutionary perspective. J Nutr. 2000;130(2S Suppl):426S–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Duijts L, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, Moll HA. Prolonged and exclusive breastfeeding reduces the risk of infectious diseases in infancy. Pediatrics. 2010;126(1):e18–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Stuebe A. The risks of not breastfeeding for mothers and infants. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2(4):222-231.Google Scholar
  7. Horta BL, Victora CG. Short-term effects of breastfeeding: A systematic review on the benefits of breastfeeding on diarrhoea and pneumonia mortality. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.Google Scholar
  8. Savitha M, Nandeeshwara S, Kumar MP, Raju C. Modifiable risk factors for acute lower respiratory tract infections. Indian J Pediatr. 2007;74(5):477–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kramer MS. Breastfeeding and allergy: the evidence. Ann Nutr Metab. 2011;59 suppl 1:20–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Oddy W, Holt P, Sly P, Read A, Landau L, Stanley F, Kendall G, Burton P. Association between breastfeeding and asthma in 6 year old children: findings of a prospective birth cohort study. Br Med J. 1999;319(7213):815–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Verret-Chalifour J, Giguere Y, Forest JC, Croteau J, Zhang P, Marc I. Breastfeeding initiation: impact of obesity in a large Canadian perinatal cohort study. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117512.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Von Kries R, Koletzko B, Sauerwald T, Von Mutius E, Barnert D, Grunert V, Von Voss H. Breastfeeding and obesity: a cross-sectional study. Br Med J. 1999;319(7203):147–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones ME, Swerdlow AJ, Gill LE, Goldacre MJ. Prenatal and early life risk factors for childhood onset diabetes mellitus: a record linkage study. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27(3):444–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pettitt DJ, Forman MR, Hanson RL, Knowler WC, Bennett PH. Breastfeeding and incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in Pima Indians. Lancet. 1997;350(9072):166–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jedrychowski W, Perera F, Jankowski J, Butscher M, Mroz E, Flak E, Kaim I, Lisowska-Miszczyk I, Skarupa A, Sowa A. Effect of exclusive breastfeeding on the development of children’s cognitive function in the Krakow prospective birth cohort study. Eur J Pediatr. 2012;171(1):151–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Quinn P, O’callaghan M, Williams G, Najman J, Andersen M, Bor W. The effect of breastfeeding on child development at 5 years: a cohort study. J Paediatr Child Health. 2001;37(5):465–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Himani, Kaur B, Kumar P. Effect of initiation of breastfeeding within one hour of the delivery on “maternal-infant bonding”. Nurs Midwifery Res J. 2011;7(3):99-109.Google Scholar
  18. Begum K, Dewey KG. Impact of early initiation of exclusive breastfeeding on newborn deaths. Alive and Thrive Technical Brief. 2010;1:99-109Google Scholar
  19. Ahmed FU, Rahmani M, Alam M. Prelacteal feeding: influencing factors and relation to establishment of lactation. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 1996;22(2):60–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Engebretsen IMS, Nankabirwa V, Doherty T, Diallo AH, Nankunda J, Fadnes LT, Ekström E-C, Ramokolo V, Meda N, Sommerfelt H. Early infant feeding practices in three African countries: the PROMISE-EBF trial promoting exclusive breastfeeding by peer counsellors. Int Breastfeed J. 2014;9:1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Khanal V, Adhikari M, Sauer K, Zhao Y, Egata G, Berhane Y, Worku A, Holbrook K, White M, Heyman M. Factors associated with the introduction of prelacteal feeds in Nepal: findings from the Nepal demographic and health survey 2011. Int Breastfeed J. 2013;8:9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Legesse M, Demena M, Mesfin F, Haile D. Prelacteal feeding practices and associated factors among mothers of children aged less than 24 months in Raya Kobo district, Northeastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Int Breastfeed J. 2014;9:1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Nguyen PH, Keithly SC, Nguyen NT, Nguyen TT, Tran LM, Hajeebhoy N. Prelacteal feeding practices in Vietnam: challenges and associated factors. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:932.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Raheem RA, Binns CW, Chih HJ, Sauer K. Determinants of the introduction of prelacteal feeds in the Maldives. Breastfeed Med. 2014;9(9):473–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rogers NL, Abdi J, Moore D, Nd’iangui S, Smith LJ, Carlson AJ, Carlson D. Colostrum avoidance, prelacteal feeding and late breastfeeding initiation in rural Northern Ethiopia. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14(11):2029–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gedefaw M, Berhe R. Determinates of childhood pneumonia and diarrhea with special emphasis to exclusive breastfeeding in north Achefer district, northwest Ethiopia: a case control study. Open J Epidemiol. 2015;5(02):107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Central Statistical Authority [Ethiopia] and ORC Macro. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2011. Addis Ababa. Maryland: Ethiopia and Calverton; 2011.Google Scholar
  28. Mengistu K, Alemu K, Destaw B. Prevalence of malnutrition and associated factors among children aged 6–59 months at Hidabu Abote District, North Shewa, Oromia Regional State. J Nutr Disorders Ther. 2013;1:1–15.Google Scholar
  29. Perez-Escamilla R, Segura-Millan S, Canahuati J, Allen H. Prelacteal feeds are negatively associated with breastfeeding outcomes in Honduras. J Nutr. 1996;126(11):2765–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ludvigsson JF. Breastfeeding intentions, patterns, and determinants in infants visiting hospitals in La Paz, Bolivia. BMC Pediatr. 2003;3:5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Edmond KM, Kirkwood BR, Amenga-Etego S, Owusu-Agyei S, Hurt LS. Effect of early infant feeding practices on infection-specific neonatal mortality: an investigation of the causal links with observational data from rural Ghana. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(4):1126–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mullany LC, Katz J, Li YM, Khatry SK, Leclerq SC, Darmstadt GL, Tielsch JM. Breastfeeding patterns, time to initiation, and mortality risk among newborns in Southern Nepal. J Nutr. 2008;138(3):599–603.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Edmond KM, Zandoh C, Quigley MA, Amenga-Etego S, Owusu-Agyei S, Kirkwood BR. Delayed breastfeeding initiation increases risk of neonatal mortality. Pediatrics. 2006;117(3):e380–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Mukuria AG, Kothari MT, Abderrahim N. Infant and Young Child Feeding Update. Maryland, USA: ORC Macro Calverton; 2006.Google Scholar
  35. Ibadin O, Ofili N, Monday P, Nwajei C. Prelacteal feeding practices among lactating mothers in Benin City, Nigeria. Nigerian J Paediatr. 2013;40(2):139–44.Google Scholar
  36. Tessema M, Belachew T, Ersino G. Feeding patterns and stunting during early childhood in rural communities of Sidama, South Ethiopia. Pan African Med J. 2013;14:75.Google Scholar
  37. Federal Ministry of Health. Family Health Department Ethiopia: National strategy for infant and young child feeding. 2004.Google Scholar
  38. Central Statistical Authority [Ethiopia] and ORC Macro. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2005. Addis Ababa. Maryland: Ethiopia and Calverton; 2005.Google Scholar
  39. Bekele Y, Mengistie B, Mesfine F. Prelacteal feeding practice and associated factors among mothers attending immunization clinic in Harari region public health facilities, Eastern Ethiopia. Open J Prev Med. 2014;4:529–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. WHO. Infant and young child feeding : model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009. ISBN 978 92 4 159749 4.Google Scholar
  41. Akuse RM, Obinya EA. Why healthcare workers give prelacteal feeds. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56(8):729–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Aborigo RA, Moyer CA, Rominski S, Adongo P, Williams J, Logonia G, Affah G, Hodgson A, Engmann C. Infant nutrition in the first seven days of life in rural northern Ghana. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:76.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Semega-Janneh IJ, Bohler E, Holm H, Matheson I, Holmboe-Ottesen G. Promoting breastfeeding in rural Gambia: combining traditional and modern knowledge. Health Policy Plan. 2001;16(2):199–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Katepa-Bwalya M, Mukonka V, Kankasa C, Masaninga F, Babaniyi O, Siziya S. Infants and young children feeding practices and nutritional status in two districts of Zambia. Int Breastfeed J. 2015;10:5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. El-Gilany AH, Abdel-Hady DM. Newborn first feed and prelacteal feeds in Mansoura, Egypt. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:258470.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Tariku et al. 2016

Advertisement