Global trends in exclusive breastfeeding
© Cai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 31 May 2012
Accepted: 26 September 2012
Published: 28 September 2012
Infant and young child feeding is critical for child health and survival. Proportion of infants 0–5 months who are fed exclusively with breast milk is a common indicator used for monitoring and evaluating infant and young child feeding in a given country and region. Despite progress made since 1990, a previous review in 2006 of global and regional trends found improvement to be modest. The current study provides an update in global and regional trends in exclusive breastfeeding from 1995 to 2010, taking advantage of the wealth of data from recent household surveys.
Using the global database of infant and young child feeding maintained by the United Nations Children’s Fund, the authors examined estimates from 440 household surveys in 140 countries over the period between 1995 and 2010 and calculated global and regional averages of the rate of exclusive breastfeeding among infants 0–5 months for the two time points to assess the trends.
Trend data suggest the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding among infants younger than six months in developing countries increased from 33% in 1995 to 39% in 2010. The prevalence increased in almost all regions in the developing world, with the biggest improvement seen in West and Central Africa.
In spite of the well-recognized importance of exclusive breastfeeding, the practice is not widespread in the developing world and increase on the global level is still very modest with much room for improvement. Child nutrition programmes worldwide continue to require investments and commitments to improve infant feeding practices in order to have maximum impact on children’s lives.
Infant and young child feeding is critical for child health and survival. Based on well-established evidence, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) recommend that mothers put newborns to the breast within one hour of birth, breastfeed infants exclusively for the first six months and continue to breastfeed for two years and beyond, together with nutritionally adequate, safe, age-appropriate, responsive feeding of solid, semi-solid and soft foods starting in the sixth month [1, 2]. There has been growing evidence of the significant impact of early initiation of breastfeeding, preferably within the first hour after birth, on reducing overall neonatal mortality [3–5]. For the first six months of life, breast milk alone is the ideal nourishment, providing all of the nutrients, including vitamins and minerals, an infant needs, meaning that no other liquid or food is needed . In addition, breast milk carries antibodies from the mother that help combat disease, protecting babies from diarrhoea and acute respiratory infections . Breastfeeding also stimulates an infant’s immune system and response to vaccination and, according to some studies, confers cognitive benefits as well [7–10]. Continued breastfeeding beyond six months, accompanied by sufficient quantities of nutritionally adequate, safe and appropriate solid, semi-solid and soft foods, also helps ensure good nutritional status and protects against illnesses. It has been estimated that optimal breastfeeding of children under two years of age has the potential to prevent 1.4 million deaths in children under five in the developing world annually .
Unfortunately, early cessation of breastfeeding in favor of commercial breast milk substitutes, introduction of liquids such as water and juices, needless supplementation and poorly timed introduction of solid, semi-solid and soft foods, often of poor quality, is far too common. Although progress has been made since the 1990s, prior reviews  of global trends highlight modest improvements in the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding among children aged less than six months.
In the current study, we aimed at updating the global and regional trends in the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding among children aged less than six months during the 15-year period from 1995 to 2010.
UNICEF maintains a global database of internationally comparable indicators for monitoring infant and young child feeding practices. This database contains data from 440 national household surveys for 140 countries and is updated annually using objective criteria to assess data quality. These data are used to annually report current levels of breastfeeding at global, regional and country levels . Many of the feeding practice indicator data come from UNICEF-supported Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) and United States Agency for International Development (USAID) supported Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), which use a standard set of questions on feeding practices during the 24 hours preceding the survey interview, described in detail elsewhere . Country-specific estimates of exclusive breastfeeding rates are calculated according to the standard definition, specified by UNICEF and WHO . Data from nationally representative household surveys other than the MICS and DHS are also included in the UNICEF global database if the data are collected, and indicators computed, using a similar methodology. Detailed information about the MICS and the DHS is available online [15, 16]. The current study, a secondary data analysis, was exempt from ethical review as it involved studying existing data that were completely anonymised and delinked from the originating survey participants.
In this review, trends in the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding among infants younger than six months are reported using data from a subset of countries where at least two comparable data points were available for each country. In total, data were included from 66 countries covering 74% of the developing world population, excluding China for which trend data are currently not available.
Trends at country level were computed by extrapolating existing survey estimates to the baseline year at 1995 and to the follow-up year at 2010 based on the average annual rate of change for each country between available survey data points . Resulting country estimates for 1995 and 2010 were then aggregated to compute regional and global totals using population-weighted averages, where the population weight is the number of births in each country at a given year, obtained from the United Nations Population Division , as a proxy for the number of infants 0 to 5 months old. Regional classifications are published by UNICEF in its annual flagship publications . No statistical tests were performed to determine significance of the regional and global trends. It is recognized that uncertainty around the country-specific estimates may be substantial given that the number of infants younger than six months included in the sampling frame of a standard MICS and DHS can be relatively small.
Due to lack of trend data from China, there was insufficient data to describe regional patterns for East Asia and Pacific. Excluding China, the prevalence in East Asia and Pacific remained roughly unchanged at around 30% during the past 20 years. Similarly, there was insufficient data for the Middle East and North Africa, Latin America and Caribbean and the Central and Eastern Europe regions (owing largely to a lack of surveys during 1995 and 2010 in a number of populous countries).
Although considerable improvements have been made in some regions, the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding remains far too low in many areas of the developing world. Our review of data from 66 countries covering 74% of the developing world population – an increase in data coverage from the 38 countries reported previously by Labbok and colleagues , observed suboptimal coverage of exclusive breastfeeding, with less than 40% of infants younger than six months of age estimated to be exclusively breastfed in 2010. This is far below the widely accepted “universal coverage” target of 90% coverage  and suggests the need for an urgent acceleration of efforts to scale up effective programs in promoting exclusive breastfeeding .
While the observed trends lend support to the role of policies and programs focused on breastfeeding – such as the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes [23, 24] supported by UNICEF, WHO and other partners, it is, of course, impossible to make causal statements based on these data. Causal inference about the linkage between policy and programme and improvements in exclusive breastfeeding would require additional country-specific qualitative and quantitative analyses, including a review of infant and young child feeding area graphs [19, 20] and analysis of disparity and population characteristic data [25, 26] that fall beyond the purpose of this brief report.
In spite of the well-recognized importance of exclusive breastfeeding, the practice is not widespread in the developing world. Others have estimated that suboptimal breastfeeding practices are responsible for more than 1 million child deaths annually and even more striking levels of childhood morbidity . In line with the Global Strategy put forward 20 years ago , UNICEF’s strategy and actions in support of infant and young child feeding underline the importance of multi-sectoral approaches to improve health and nutrition and support of proven activities at national, health system and community levels, such as behaviour and social change related to optimal infant feeding practices . If we are clear-sighted in our vision for improving the nutritional status of children worldwide and the importance of the first 1,000 days of life from conception to two years of age , then we will acknowledge there is much room for improvement. Child nutrition programmes worldwide continue to require investments and commitments to improve infant feeding practices in order to have maximum impact on children’s lives.
The authors would like to thank colleagues in the Nutrition Section of the Programme Division at United Nations Children’s Fund, Dr. Nune Mangasaryan and Christiane Rudert, for valuable input into interpretation of results and discussions of this manuscript.
- Butte NF, Lopez-Alarcon MG, Garza C: Nutrient adequacy of exclusive breastfeeding for the term infant during the first six months of life. 2002, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization: United Nations Children’s Fund: Global Strategy for Infantand Young Child Feeding. 2003, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- Edmond KM, Zandoh C, Quigley MA, Amenga-Etego S, Owusu-Agyei S, Kirkwood BR: Delayed breastfeeding initiation increases risk of neonatal mortality. Pediatrics. 2006, 117: e380-e386. 10.1542/peds.2005-1496.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mullany LC, Katz J, Li YM, Khatry SK, Leclerq SC, Darmstadt GL, Tielsch JM: Breast-feeding patterns, time to initiation, and mortality risk among newborns in southern Nepal. J Nutr. 2008, 138: 599-603.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singh K: The effect of colostrum on infant mortality: urban rural differentials. Health and Population. 1992, 15: 94-100.Google Scholar
- Hanson LA: Immunobiology of Human Milk. 2004, Pharmasoft Publishing, Amarillo, Texas, USA, 1Google Scholar
- Dorea JG: Breastfeeding is an essential complement to vaccination. Acta Paediatr. 2009, 98: 1244-1250. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01345.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drane DL, Logemann JA: A critical evaluation of the evidence on the association between type of infant feeding and cognitive development. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000, 14: 349-356. 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2000.00301.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mortensen EL, Michaelsen KF, Sanders SA, Reinisch JM: The association between duration of breastfeeding and adult intelligence. JAMA. 2002, 287: 2365-2371. 10.1001/jama.287.18.2365.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anderson JW, Johnstone BM, Remley DT: Breast-feeding and cognitive development: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999, 70: 525-535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, de Onis M, Ezzati M, Mathers C, Rivera J: Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet. 2008, 371: 243-260. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61690-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Labbok MH, Wardlaw T, Blanc A, Clark D, Terreri N: Trends in exclusive breastfeeding: findings from the 1990s. J Hum Lact. 2006, 22: 272-276. 10.1177/0890334405279256.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- United Nations Children’s Fund: Current status and progress in infant and young child feeding. 2012,http://www.childinfo.org/breastfeeding_status.html,Google Scholar
- World Health Organization: United Nations Children’s Fund: Indicators for assessing infantand young child feedingindicators. 2008, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- United Nations Children’s Fund: Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys. 2011,http://www.childinfo.org/mics.html,Google Scholar
- Measure DHS: DHS Overview. 2011,http://www.measuredhs.com/What-We-Do/Survey-Types/DHS.cfm,Google Scholar
- United Nations Population Division: World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision. 2011, New York, United States: United Nations Population DivisionGoogle Scholar
- United Nations Children’s Fund: The State of the World’s Children. 2011, New York, United States: United Nations Children’s FundGoogle Scholar
- United Nations Children’s Fund: Introduction to interpreting area graphs for infant and young child feeding. 2010, New York, United States: United Nations Children’s FundGoogle Scholar
- United Nations Children’s Fund: Infant feeding patterns by country. 2012,http://www.childinfo.org/breastfeeding_infantfeeding.html,Google Scholar
- Jones G, Steketee RW, Black RE, Bhutta ZA, Morris SS: How many child deaths can we prevent this year?. Lancet. 2003, 362: 65-71. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13811-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- United Nations Children’s Fund, AED: Consolidated report of six-country review of breastfeeding programmes. 2010, New York, United States: United Nations Children’s FundGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization: United Nations Children’s Fund: Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. 2009, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization: International code of marketing of breast-milk substitutes. 1981, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- Grummer-Strawn LM: The effect of changes in population characteristics on breastfeeding trends in fifteen developing countries. Int J Epidemiol. 1996, 25: 94-102. 10.1093/ije/25.1.94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lutter CK, Chaparro CM, Grummer-Strawn LM: Increases in breastfeeding in Latin America and the Caribbean: an analysis of equity. Health Policy Plan. 2011, 26: 257-265. 10.1093/heapol/czq046.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- United Nations Children’s Fund: Infant and young child feeding -- UNICEF response. 2012,http://www.unicef.org/nutrition/index_24819.html,Google Scholar
- The 1,000 days partnership: Why 1,000 days?. 2012,http://www.thousanddays.org/about/,Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.