Skip to main content

Table 6 Characteristics associated with improved confidence caring for breastfeeding dyads and with giving correct advice about recommended duration of breastfeeding. The results of univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis of relationships between work site and personal factors and confidence and correct advice when caring for breastfeeding dyads are presented

From: Determinants of health care worker breastfeeding experience and practices and their association with provision of care for breastfeeding mothers: a mixed-methods study from Northern Thailand

  

Confidence caring for breastfeeding dyads* n = 281

Breastfeeding advice consistent with WHO** n = 281

Characteristic

proportion (%)

p

aOR (95%CI)

p

proportion (%)

p

aOR (95%CI)

p

Met both WHO goals

no

108/235 (46)

   

113/236 (48)

ref

  

yes

21/30 (70)

0.016

2.6 (1.1–6.4)

0.033

17/30 (57)

0.243

1.5 (0.7–3.4)

0.299

Low BF prevalence, low support (TH2)

31/61 (51)

ref

ref

 

45/68 (66)

ref

  

Low BF prevalence, high support (TH1)

38/82 (46)

0.742

1.2 (0.6–2.8)

0.605

27/59 (46)

0.022

0.4 (0.2–0.8)

0.009

High BF prevalence, low support (CBO2)

32/68 (47)

0.930

1.4 (0.6–3.1)

0.382

29/82 (35)

< 0.001

0.5 (0.2–1.5)

0.207

High BF prevalence, high support (CBO1)

29/58 (50)

0.670

2.1 (0.9–4.9)

0.088

32/61 (52)

0.114

1.5 (0.5–4.6)

0.517

Age (years)#

< 30

29/72 (39)

 

ref

 

34/73 (47)

0.625

  

≥ 30

102/197 (52)

0.062

1.9 (1.1–3.6)

0.032

99/197 (50)

ref

  

Occupation

Nurse or MW

76/124 (61)

< 0.001

2.6 (1.5–4.7)

0.001

67/125 (54)

0.241

  

Other

54/145 (37)

 

ref

 

66/145 (46)

ref

  

Training

informal

72/155 (46)

   

65/155 (42)

ref

  

formal

58/114 (51)

0.473

  

68/115 (59)

0.037

2.1 (0.8–5.5)

0.139

Number of BF patients in the past 3 months

≤ 10

25/72 (35)

 

ref

 

26/72 (36)

ref

ref

 

> 10

105/197 (53)

0.008

1.6 (0.9–2.9)

0.145

107/198 (54)

0.006

2.1 (1.2–3.7)

0.014

Number of patients with breastfeeding problems in the past 3 months

0

11/55 (20)

 

ref

 

25/55 (45)

ref

  

≥ 1

119/214 (56)

< 0.001

3.3 (1.6–6.5)

0.001

108/205 (50)

0.621

  

Breastfeeding attitude quartile

(1 is the least positive, 4 is the most positive)

1

27/66 (41)

ref

ref

 

20/66 (30)

ref

  

2

29/72 (40)

0.940

0.8 (0.4–1.6)

0.506

35/72 (49)

0.029

2.3 (1.2–4.7)

0.025

3

32/66 (48)

0.382

1.3 (0.6–2.7)

0.520

36/66 (55)

0.006

3.4 (1.6–7.1)

0.001

4

42/64 (66)

0.005

1.8 (0.7–4.2)

0.193

42/65 (65)

0.001

2.6 (1.2-6.0)

0.021

  1. All results in bold are those that are statistically significant (p-value < 0.05)
  2. Note: Duration of breastfeeding by self or partner, positive or negative breastfeeding experience, breastfeeding knowledge score, and high school education were not associated with confidence or advice consistent with WHO.
  3. Abbreviations: BF breastfeeding, CBO community based organization, ref reference, TH Thai hospital, WHO World Health Organization
  4. # < 30 was the lowest quartile for overall staff age
  5. * Adjusted for meeting WHO goals, work site, age, occupation, number of breastfeeding patients, number of patients with breastfeeding problems, breastfeeding attitude quartile, and also for sex and advice consistent with WHO recommendations (not significant)
  6. ** Adjusted for meeting WHO goals, work site, training, number of breastfeeding patients, breastfeeding attitude quartile, and also for confidence (not significant)