Skip to main content

Table 1 Dimensions captured for quantitative analysis

From: The infant feeding methods promoted by South African Instagram influencers in relation to crying and sleeping, 2018–2020: a retrospective digital ethnography

Infant feeding

# of posts discussing infant feeding methods for infants by the influencers fitting the inclusion criteria: EBF for infants < 6 months, breastfeeding up to 36 months, complementary feeding, BMS use

Crying

# of posts discussing BMS in relation to crying on the influencers’ handles

Sleeping

# of posts discussing BMS in relation to sleeping on the influencers’ handles

Ads

# of adverts by companies producing BMS on the selected influencers’ pages. Adverts are posts made by influencers on behalf of companies, and they usually get paid for the posts

Sources

who was quoted in the posts as giving advice on infant feeding, e.g. categories of health care professionals, mother to mother, BMS producing companies’ representatives

Slant

Attitudes towards breastfeeding or BMS of both original posts and follower responses: Pro-BMS, Pro-breastfeeding, neutral

Violations Sponsorship

# of posts potentially violating R991 and the Code

# of posts that an influencer was paid to share on their profile. These posts are identified through phrases such as “paid partnership with”, “#AD, #sponsored by” etc

Type of BMS

BMS broken down by type, ie bottles/teats, gadgets for facilitating the use of BMS, pacifiers, complementary food marketed for infants younger than 6 months and baby formula