Evaluating antenatal breastmilk expression outcomes: a scoping review

Table 2 Summary of Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) [32] results evaluating quality of included studies (n = 20)

Author (year of publication)	Screening questions (number of ‘yes’)	MMAT study design	Methodological quality questions (number of ‘yes’)
Blaikley et al. (1953) [44]	1/2	Quantitative non-randomized	2/5
Brisbane et al. (2015) [34]	2/2	Qualitative study	3/5
Brown et al. (1975) [47]	1/2	Quantitative randomized control trial	2/5
Casey et al. (2019) [36]	2/2	Quantitative non-randomized	2/5
Casey et al. (2019) [35]	2/2	Qualitative study	5/5
Clay (2005) [43]	0/2	Qualitative study	0/5
Demirci et al. (2018) [38]	1/2	Quantitative descriptive	4/5
Demirci et al. (2019) [37]	2/2	Qualitative study	5/5
Fair et al. (2018) [39]	2/2	Qualitative study	3/5
Forster et al. (2011) [13]	1/2	Quantitative non-randomized	2/5
Forster et al. (2017) [21]	2/2	Quantitative randomized control trial	3/5
Ingelman-Sundberg (1958) [46]	0/2	Quantitative non-randomized	0/5
Lamba et al. (2016) [40]	2/2	Quantitative randomized controlled trial	1/5
O’Sullivan et al. (2019) [24]	2/2	Qualitative study	2/5
Rietveld (2011) [42]	2/2	Mixed methods	2/5
Singh et al. (2009) [16]	2/2	Quantitative randomized control trial	1/5
Soltani et al. (2012) [20]	2/2	Quantitative non-randomized	3/5
Uikey et al. (2017) [41]	2/2	Quantitative randomized controlled trial	1/5
Waller (1946) [45]	1/2	Quantitative non-randomized	1/5
Weinel et al. (2019) [33]	0/2	Quantitative descriptive	1/5

ISSN: 1746-4358