Skip to main content

Table 2 Participant characteristics of breastfeeding after returning to work

From: Effectiveness of a breastfeeding program for mothers returning to work in Japan: a quasi-experimental study

Variables

Program group

(n = 48)

Pamphlet group

(n = 46)

Comparison group

(n = 47)

P value

Timing of return to work postpartum (months)a, mean (SD)

9.3 (2.6)

9.9 (2.3)

8.8 (2.5)

0.09

Working hours per daya, mean (SD)

7.0 (1.1)

7.3 (1.2)

6.9 (1.0)

0.23

Partner’s support in child careb

 Yes

45 (93.8)

43 (93.5)

40 (85.1)

0.30

 No

3 (6.3)

3 (6.5)

7 (14.9)

Presence of a peer to assist with breastfeedingc, n (%)

 Yes

40 (83.3)

41 (89.1)

37 (78.7)

0.40

 No

8 (16.7)

5 (10.9)

10 (21.3)

Consultation with midwives before and after returning to workc, n (%)

 Yes

17 (35.4)

22 (47.8)

10 (21.3)

0.03

 No

31 (64.6)

24 (52.2)

37 (78.7)

Feeding a baby expressed milk at daycarec, n (%)

 Yes

22 (45.8)

18 (39.1)

20 (42.6)

0.81

 No or unknown

26 (54.2)

28 (60.9)

27 (57.4)

Lactation room at workplace, n (%)

 Yes

2 (4.2)

3 (6.5)

1 (2.1)

 

 Secured a lactation room by herself

23 (47.9)

21 (45.7)

10 (21.3)

 

 No

23 (47.9)

22 (47.8)

35 (74.5)

 

 Work at home

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.1)

 

Milk expression breaks at workplace, n (%)

 Secured

3 (6.3)

4 (8.7)

3 (6.4)

 

 Secured break by herself

36 (75.0)

25 (54.3)

13 (27.7)

 

 Breaks not secured or unknown

9 (18.8)

17 (26.1)

29 (61.7)

 

 No answer

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

2 (4.3)

 

Refrigerator to store breast milk, n (%)

 Yes

29 (60.4)

27 (58.7)

12 (25.5)

 

 No

19 (39.6)

19 (41.3)

31 (66.0)

 

 No answer

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

4 (8.5)

 
  1. a One-way analysis of variance, bFisher’s exact test, c Chi-square test