Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of logistic regression analysis for predicting a pass on the IBLCE exam (N = 78)

From: The IBLCE exam: candidate experience, motivation, study strategies used and predictors of success

Criteria

Variables

Odds Ratio

95% CI for Odds ratio

R2*

Model 1†

 Passed the test (0-No, 1-Yes)

How many hours of clinical practice you had(1-less than five to 3-more than ten)

260.59

0.83,81,691.2

0.68

Number of hours of bedside learning (1-less than 5 to 3-more than 10)

0.45

0.06,3.09

Forms of informal breastfeeding education have you attended: Breastfeeding conferences/symposiums(0-No, 1-Yes)

2.51

0.24 26.36

Forms of informal breastfeeding education have you attended: 20-h course for primary health care teams (0-No, 1-Yes)

2.55

0.97,6.71

Forms of informal breastfeeding education have you attended: Breastfeeding webinars(0-No, 1-Yes)

1.66

0.51,5.38

Motivation for sitting exam: To improve my knowledge in breastfeeding (0-No, 1-Yes)

1.42

0.58,3.44

Motivation for sitting exam: So I can work as an IBCLC (0-No, 1-Yes)

1.11

0.56,2.21

Study strategies used: Reread handouts (0-No, 1-Yes)

0.10

0.01,2.21

Study strategies used: Tested myself with practice questions (0-No, 1-Yes)

0.22

0.01,3.61

Study strategies used:Studied with others (0-No, 1-Yes)

1.12

0.54,2.34

Study strategies used Underlined or highlighted while reading(0-No, 1-Yes)

0.81

0.33,1.99

Materials used: Course handouts(0-No, 1-Yes)

0.56

0.09,3.57

Materials used: Translated questions from Comprehensive Lactation Consultant Exam Review (0-No, 1-Yes)

1.44

0.54,3.86

How clear were instructions provided by IBCLC regarding exam procedure (1-unclear to 3-completely clear)

1.18

0.07,19.55

How clear were the photographs used in the test?(1-unclear to 3-completely clear)

2.68

0.22,32.51

Constant

0.06

 

Model 2‡

 Passed the test (0-No, 1-Yes)

How many hours of clinical practice you had(1-less than five to 3-more than ten)

0.48

0.28,0.82

0.42

Non-formal breastfeeding education: Congresses/Simposiums(0-No, 1-Yes)

7.49

2.26,24.84

How clear were the photographs used in the test?(1-unclear to 3-completely clear)

3.49

1.17,10.41

Constant

 

0.08

  1. *Nagerlkerke R squared.
  2. † Enter method, some variables which were significant between groups were not fitted in the model, due to the large amount of error
  3. ‡ Stepwise method, only data for significant variables were included.