Skip to main content

Table 2 Subgroup analysis which indicates the pooled prevalence prelacteal feeding practices in Ethiopia

From: Prelacteal feeding and associated factors in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis

Subgroups

Number of studies included

Prevalence (95% CI)

Heterogeneity statistics

p - value

I2

Tau-squared

Region

Amhara

15

27.37 (15.50, 39.25)

3764.65

< 0.001

99.6%

547.17

Oromia

5

29.76 (4.04, 55.49)

1904.20

< 0.001

99.8%

859.03

SNNP

3

17.04 (5.97, 28.11)

52.18

< 0.001

96.2%

91.43

aOthers

5

19.43 (10.17, 28.69)

319.43

< 0.001

98.7%

109.31

Time of study years

Before 2015

15

30.94 (17.51, 44.37)

5314.10

< 0.001

99.7%

701.28

2015 and above

13

18.70 (14.10, 23.30)

543.91

< 0.001

97.8%

68.67

Study setting

Community based

25

25.07 (16.67, 33.48)

8171.93

< 0.001

99.7%

456.90

Institution based

3

27.15 (8.37, 45.92)

109.26

< 0.001

98.2%

269.91

Systematic random sampling

4

29.57 (15.19, 43.94)

200.50

< 0.001

98.5%

211.74

Sampling techniques

Multistage random sampling

11

19.38 (13.10, 25.66)

999.06

< 0.001

99.0%

110.54

Simple random sampling

9

29.57 (11.93, 47.22)

2037.82

< 0.001

99.6%

726.33

Census

4

27.34 (1.61, 53.08)

798.42

< 0.001

99.6%

686.01

  1. aTigray, B/gumuz, Afar and national study