Table 2 Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly Committee team progress in completing tasks
From: Pilot testing of the Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly toolbox in Ghana
Teams | Gears assigned | Committee Meetings | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First | Second | Third | Fourth | Between Fourth and Fifth | ||
Team 1 | Legislation and policy (10 benchmarks) | All teams attended training, developed team work plan and submitted to BBF1 Coordination | 90% (n = 9) benchmarks scored; insufficient data to score 1 benchmark | 90% (n = 9) of benchmarks scored. Additional data sources recommended for scoring | Consensus reached by BBFa committee on 90% (n = 9) of benchmarks | Consensus reached by committee on 100% (n = 10) of benchmarks |
Funding and resources (4 benchmarks) | 100% (n = 4) benchmarks scored | 100% (n = 4) of benchmarks scored. Additional data sources recommended to explain scores | Consensus reached by BBF committee on 100% (n = 4) of benchmarks | – | ||
Team 2 | Advocacy (4 benchmarks) | 100% (n = 4) of benchmarks scored | 100% (n = 4) of benchmarks scored; Data gaps related to scores reported | Consensus reached by BBF committee on 100% (n = 4) of benchmarks | – | |
Political will (3 benchmarks) | 100% of benchmarks scored | 100% (n = 3) of benchmarks scored; Data gaps related to scores reported | Consensus reached by BBF committee on 100% (n = 3) of benchmarks. | – | ||
Promotion (3 benchmarks) | 100% of benchmarks scored | 100% (n = 3) of benchmarks scored. Data gaps related to scores reported | Consensus reached by BBF committee on 100% (n = 3) of benchmarks | – | ||
Team 3 | Training and program delivery (17 benchmarks) | 18% (3) of benchmarks scored; insufficient data to score 14 benchmarks | 76% (n = 13) of bench marks scored | Consensus reached by BBF committee on 47% (n = 8) of benchmarks | Consensus reached by BBF committee on 100% (n = 17) of benchmarks | |
Team 4 | Research and evaluation (10 benchmarks) | 80% (n = 8) of benchmarks scored; insufficient data to score 2 benchmarks | 90% (n = 9) of benchmarks scored; questions raised about robustness of data used for scoring | Consensus reached by BBF committee on 50% (n = 5) of benchmarks | Consensus reached by BBF committee on 100% (n = 10) of benchmarks | |
Coordination, goals and monitoring (3 benchmarks) | None of the benchmarks scored | 100% (n = 3) of benchmarks scored | Consensus reached by BBF committee on 66% (n = 2) of benchmarks | Consensus reached by BBF committee on 100% (n = 3) of benchmarks | ||