Skip to main content

Table 2 Breastfeeding challenges reported by participants (n = 240)

From: Challenges and predictors of exclusive breastfeeding among mothers attending the child welfare clinic at a regional hospital in Ghana: a descriptive cross-sectional study

 

Total

(n = 240)

M (SD)

EBF

(n = 160)

M (SD)

Non-EBF

(n = 80)

M (SD)

EBF

Median (IQR)

Non-EBF

Median (IQR)

P - value

Worry about breastmilk alone not meeting the nutritional needs of baby

3.43 (1.35)

3.40 (1.32)

3.50 (1.41)

4 (2–4)

4 (2–5)

0.443

Short Maternity Leave Period

3.41 (1.29)

3.44 (1.29)

3.35 (1.30)

3 (3–5)

3 (3–5)

0.744

Sociocultural pressure to introduce water and artificial feeds

3.39 (1.28)

3.34 (1.31)

3.50 (1.23)

4 (2–4)

4 (2–5)

0.367

Difficulty combining work and breastfeeding

3.18 (1.30)

3.42 (1.34)

2.68 (1.07)

4 (2–5)

3 (2–3)

0.000

Emotional stress

3.10 (1.19)

3.28 (1.13)

2.75 (1.23)

3 (2–4)

3 (2–4)

0.001

Lack of support from family, friends and society

2.74 (1.35)

2.86 (1.40)

2.50 (1.23)

2 (2–4)

2 (2–4)

0.060

Lack of support from healthcare professionals

2.66 (1.21)

2.76 (1.22)

2.45 (1.17)

3 (2–4)

2 (2–3)

0.040

Low breastmilk production

2.63 (1.21)

2.56 (1.16)

2.78 (1.28)

2 (2–3)

2 (2–4)

0.263

Cracked or sore nipples

2.55 (1.24)

2.49 (1.17)

2.68 (1.36)

2 (2–4)

2 (1.25–4)

0.390

Breast engorgement

2.55 (1.24)

2.49 (1.17)

2.68 (1.36)

2 (2–4)

2 (1.25–4)

0.390

Shyness when breastfeeding in public

2.05 (1.23)

2.08 (1.27)

2.00 (1.15)

2 (1–2)

2 (1–2)

0.781

  1. Mann Whitney’s U test was used to examine differences in the challenges experiences by the mothers who practised EBF and those who used mixed/formula feeding, as well as their statistical significance
  2. M Mean, SD Standard Deviation, IQR Interquartile Range